Hematopathology Section, Laboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH 10 Center Drive, Room 3S 235, MSC 1500, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Mod Pathol. 2020 Jan;33(Suppl 1):96-106. doi: 10.1038/s41379-019-0385-7. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
In recent years great progress has been made in understanding the classification of lymphomas. The integration of morphologic, clinical, immunophenotypic, and molecular features provides a rational basis for defining disease entities and has led to worldwide consensus. Hematopathologists and dermatopathologists have worked together to define those lymphomas that are present most commonly in the skin. Some cutaneous lymphomas have distinctive features and differ from their nodal counterparts. This is most evident in the delineation of primary cutaneous follicle center lymphoma and primary cutaneous marginal zone lymphoma. Both are very indolent, with low risk to spread beyond the skin. Primary cutaneous marginal zone lymphoma shows evidence of immunoglobulin class switching, as distinct from involvement by other extranodal marginal zone lymphomas of MALT type, which may involve the skin secondarily. Some have suggested that primary cutaneous marginal zone lymphoma may be considered a benign clonal expansion, probably driven by antigen. Many cutaneous lymphomas share biological and clinical features with their systemic counterparts. For example, primary cutaneous large B-cell lymphoma, leg type, exhibits a similar gene expression and molecular profile as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the activated B-cell type, especially for those cases arising in other extranodal sites. In addition, Epstein-Barr virus plays a role in many cutaneous lesions including mucocutaneous ulcer, plasmablastic lymphoma, and even some cases of marginal zone lymphoma. These EBV-driven conditions may present primarily in the skin, but also involve other mainly extranodal sites. Thus, it is evident that some cutaneous and systemic lymphomas are driven by common pathogenetic mechanisms, necessitating an integrated approach for the classification of lymphoma in all sites.
近年来,在理解淋巴瘤的分类方面取得了重大进展。形态学、临床、免疫表型和分子特征的综合为定义疾病实体提供了合理的基础,并导致了全球共识。血液病理学家和皮肤病理学家共同努力,定义了那些最常见于皮肤的淋巴瘤。一些皮肤淋巴瘤具有独特的特征,与它们的淋巴结对应物不同。这在原发性皮肤滤泡中心淋巴瘤和原发性皮肤边缘区淋巴瘤的界定中最为明显。两者均非常惰性,扩散到皮肤以外的风险低。原发性皮肤边缘区淋巴瘤显示免疫球蛋白类别转换的证据,与其他结外边缘区淋巴瘤的 MALT 型不同,后者可能继发累及皮肤。有人认为原发性皮肤边缘区淋巴瘤可能被认为是一种良性克隆性扩张,可能由抗原驱动。许多皮肤淋巴瘤与它们的系统性对应物具有生物学和临床特征。例如,原发性皮肤大 B 细胞淋巴瘤,腿型,表现出与激活 B 细胞型弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤相似的基因表达和分子谱,特别是对于那些发生在其他结外部位的病例。此外,EB 病毒在许多皮肤病变中发挥作用,包括黏膜皮肤溃疡、浆母细胞淋巴瘤,甚至一些边缘区淋巴瘤。这些 EBV 驱动的疾病可能主要表现为皮肤,但也涉及其他主要结外部位。因此,显然一些皮肤和系统性淋巴瘤是由共同的发病机制驱动的,这需要对所有部位的淋巴瘤进行分类采用综合方法。