Aksu Özge, Pekin Doğan Yasemin, Sayıner Çağlar Nil, Şener Belit Merve
Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Sinop Atatürk State Hospital, Sinop, Turkey.
Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, İstanbul Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Aug 20;65(3):228-235. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2019.1802. eCollection 2019 Sep.
We aimed to compare the efficacy of dry needling, trigger point injection, and protection methods through physical exercise on clinical symptoms and the pain threshold in patients with temporomandibular myofascial pain.
Between March 2013 and September 2013, in a random consecutive manner, a total of 63 consecutive patients (10 males, 53 females; median age 39.4±14.9 years; range, 18 to 65 years) were randomly divided into three groups: Group 1 (only exercise and protection training), Group 2 (dry needling + exercise + protection training), and Group 3 (trigger point injection + exercise + protection training). Dry needling or trigger point injection was performed for three times to the patients in Group 2 and Group 3 on a weekly basis. All patients were followed on Day 10 and at one month.
A statistically significant improvement in the assessment and response variables was found for all groups, particularly for pain and functional limitation status (p<0.001). All groups were similar in terms of the improvement degree (p<0.001). Although not statistically significant, the highest improvement in the facial pain was seen in Group 3 on Day 10 (p=0.235); however, on Day 30, no significant difference was observed.
Our study results showed that improvement in the subjective and objective symptoms in all treatment groups. Particularly, only exercise therapy was found to be beneficial as invasive methods. We suggest that all these methods should be applied together to achieve long-term efficacy.
我们旨在比较干针疗法、触发点注射疗法以及通过体育锻炼进行的保护方法对颞下颌肌筋膜疼痛患者临床症状和疼痛阈值的疗效。
在2013年3月至2013年9月期间,以随机连续的方式,共有63例连续患者(10例男性,53例女性;中位年龄39.4±14.9岁;范围为18至65岁)被随机分为三组:第1组(仅进行锻炼和保护训练)、第2组(干针疗法+锻炼+保护训练)和第3组(触发点注射疗法+锻炼+保护训练)。第2组和第3组的患者每周接受三次干针疗法或触发点注射疗法。所有患者在第10天和1个月时进行随访。
所有组在评估和反应变量方面均有统计学上的显著改善,尤其是在疼痛和功能受限状态方面(p<0.001)。所有组在改善程度方面相似(p<0.001)。尽管无统计学意义,但在第10天,第3组面部疼痛的改善最为明显(p=0.235);然而,在第30天,未观察到显著差异。
我们的研究结果表明,所有治疗组的主观和客观症状均有改善。特别是,发现仅运动疗法作为侵入性方法是有益的。我们建议应将所有这些方法联合应用以实现长期疗效。