Institute of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Biomathematics Research Centre, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
J Math Biol. 2020 Feb;80(3):687-715. doi: 10.1007/s00285-019-01438-0. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
Phylogenetic diversity indices provide a formal way to apportion 'evolutionary heritage' across species. Two natural diversity indices are Fair Proportion (FP) and Equal Splits (ES). FP is also called 'evolutionary distinctiveness' and, for rooted trees, is identical to the Shapley Value (SV), which arises from cooperative game theory. In this paper, we investigate the extent to which FP and ES can differ, characterise tree shapes on which the indices are identical, and study the equivalence of FP and SV and its implications in more detail. We also define and investigate analogues of these indices on unrooted trees (where SV was originally defined), including an index that is closely related to the Pauplin representation of phylogenetic diversity.
系统发育多样性指数为在物种间分配“进化遗产”提供了一种正式的方法。两个自然多样性指数是公平比例(FP)和均等分割(ES)。FP 也称为“进化独特性”,对于有根树,与合作博弈论产生的 Shapley 值(SV)相同。在本文中,我们研究了 FP 和 ES 可能存在差异的程度,对指数相同的树的形状进行了特征描述,并更详细地研究了 FP 和 SV 的等价性及其含义。我们还定义并研究了无根树(SV 最初定义于此)上这些指数的类似物,包括与系统发育多样性的 Pauplin 表示密切相关的指数。