Steel Mike
Biomathematics Research Centre, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 Feb 13;380(1919):20230308. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0308. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
A wide variety of stochastic models of cladogenesis (based on speciation and extinction) lead to an identical distribution on phylogenetic tree shapes once the edge lengths are ignored. By contrast, the distribution of the tree's edge lengths is generally quite sensitive to the underlying model. In this paper, we review the impact of different model choices on tree shape and edge length distribution, and its impact for studying the properties of phylogenetic diversity (PD) as a measure of biodiversity, and the loss of PD as species become extinct at the present. We also compare PD with a stochastic model of feature diversity, and investigate some mathematical links and inequalities between these two measures plus their predictions concerning the loss of biodiversity under extinction at the present.This article is part of the theme issue "'A mathematical theory of evolution": phylogenetic models dating back 100 years'.
一旦忽略枝长,各种各样基于物种形成和灭绝的分支发生随机模型会导致系统发育树形状的相同分布。相比之下,树的枝长分布通常对基础模型相当敏感。在本文中,我们回顾了不同模型选择对树形状和枝长分布的影响,以及其对研究作为生物多样性度量的系统发育多样性(PD)的属性,以及当前物种灭绝时PD丧失的影响。我们还将PD与特征多样性的随机模型进行比较,并研究这两种度量之间的一些数学联系和不等式,以及它们关于当前灭绝情况下生物多样性丧失的预测。本文是主题为“进化的数学理论”的特刊的一部分:可追溯到100年前的系统发育模型。