Institute of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, 17489, Germany.
Department of Biological Sciences and the Crawford Lab for Evolutionary Studies, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, V5A1S6, Canada.
Syst Biol. 2021 Apr 15;70(3):480-490. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syaa062.
The extent to which phylogenetic diversity (PD) captures feature diversity (FD) is a topical and controversial question in biodiversity conservation. In this short paper, we formalize this question and establish a precise mathematical condition for FD (based on discrete characters) to coincide with PD. In this way, we make explicit the two main reasons why the two diversity measures might disagree for given data; namely, the presence of certain patterns of feature evolution and loss, and using temporal branch lengths for PD in settings that may not be appropriate (e.g., due to rapid evolution of certain features over short periods of time). Our article also explores the relationship between the "Fair Proportion" index of PD and a simple index of FD (both of which correspond to Shapley values in cooperative game theory). In a second mathematical result, we show that the two indices can take identical values for any phylogenetic tree, provided the branch lengths in the tree are chosen appropriately. [Evolutionary distinctiveness; feature diversity; phylogenetic diversity; shapley value.].
系统发育多样性(PD)在多大程度上能捕获特征多样性(FD)是生物多样性保护中的一个热门且有争议的问题。在这篇短文里,我们将形式化这个问题,并为 FD(基于离散特征)与 PD 一致建立一个精确的数学条件。这样,我们就明确了在给定数据下这两个多样性测度可能不一致的两个主要原因;即,某些特征进化和丢失模式的存在,以及在可能不合适的情况下(例如,由于某些特征在短时间内快速进化)使用时间分支长度来计算 PD。我们的文章还探讨了 PD 的“公平份额”指数与 FD 的一个简单指数(两者在合作博弈论中对应于 Shapley 值)之间的关系。在第二个数学结果中,我们表明,只要树中的分支长度选择得当,这两个指数可以在任何系统发育树上取相同的值。