Department of Psychology, Medical School Hamburg, Am Kaiserkai 1, 20457, Hamburg, Germany.
Department of Psychology, Humboldt University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Psychol Res. 2021 Feb;85(1):345-363. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01259-2. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
Dual-task performance typically leads to performance impairments in comparison to single tasks (i.e., dual-task costs). The literature discusses the contribution to these dual-task costs due to (1) bottleneck limitations in the dual-component tasks and (2) executive control processes regulating access to this bottleneck. Previous studies investigated the characteristics of executive control processes primarily triggered by external stimulus information. In the present study, however, we investigated the existence as well as the characteristics of internally triggered and driven endogenous control processes to regulate bottleneck access. In detail, we presented dual-task blocks with varying task orders and informed participants in advance about repetitions of the same task order as well as switches between different task orders (i.e., task-order repetitions and switches were predictable). Experiment 1 demonstrated that task-order information and an increased preparation time generally increase the efficiency for endogenous task-order control and improves preparation for task-order switches. This finding is basically consistent with the assumption of the existence of endogenous control processes. Experiment 2, however, did not provide evidence that this endogenous control is related with working-memory maintenance mechanisms. Experiment 3 showed that endogenous control does not only fully complete task-order preparation but also requires exogenous, stimulus-driven components.
双任务表现通常会导致与单任务相比的表现下降(即双任务成本)。文献讨论了由于(1)双组件任务中的瓶颈限制,以及(2)调节对该瓶颈的访问的执行控制过程,对这些双任务成本的贡献。先前的研究主要调查了由外部刺激信息引发的执行控制过程的特征。然而,在本研究中,我们调查了存在以及内部触发和驱动的内源性控制过程的特征,以调节瓶颈的访问。具体来说,我们呈现了具有不同任务顺序的双任务块,并提前告知参与者相同任务顺序的重复以及不同任务顺序之间的切换(即,任务顺序重复和切换是可预测的)。实验 1 表明,任务顺序信息和增加的准备时间通常会提高内源性任务顺序控制的效率,并改善任务顺序切换的准备。这一发现与内源性控制过程存在的假设基本一致。然而,实验 2 并没有提供证据表明这种内源性控制与工作记忆保持机制有关。实验 3 表明,内源性控制不仅完全完成任务顺序准备,而且还需要外源性、刺激驱动的组件。