Lackner J R, Graybiel A
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1979 Nov;50(11):1122-5.
Two experiments were performed to evaluate the influence of vision on susceptibility to motion sickness during exposure to constant patterns of vestibular stimulation. The motion profile involved accelerating subjects at 20 degrees/s2 to 300 degrees/s, maintaining them at that constant velocity for 30 s, and decelerating them to a rapid stop in about 1.5 s. The number of stops tolerated by a subject before reaching the motion sickness endpoint served as his score. In Experiment 1, subjects were tested twice with their eyes open and twice with their eyes blindfolded. They tolerated fewer sudden stops when permitted sight of the experimental chamber. In Experiment 2, the effect of having the eyes-open or closed at different stages of the motion profile was evaluated. Having the eyes open during any stage of the test was more stressful than having the eyes closed, but this was especially true during the sudden stops. The findings are discussed in terms of their general implications for understanding a) situations in which vision alone elicits symptoms of motion sickness, and b) situations involving vestibular stimulation where vision heightens susceptibility.
进行了两项实验,以评估视觉对在暴露于恒定模式的前庭刺激期间晕动病易感性的影响。运动模式包括以20度/秒²的加速度将受试者加速至300度/秒,使其以该恒定速度保持30秒,然后在约1.5秒内减速至快速停止。受试者在达到晕动病终点前能够耐受的停止次数作为其得分。在实验1中,受试者睁眼测试两次,蒙眼测试两次。当允许他们看到实验舱时,他们能耐受的突然停止次数更少。在实验2中,评估了在运动模式的不同阶段睁眼或闭眼的影响。在测试的任何阶段睁眼都比闭眼更具压力,但在突然停止期间尤其如此。从这些发现对理解以下两方面的一般意义进行了讨论:a)仅视觉引发晕动病症状的情况,以及b)涉及前庭刺激且视觉会增加易感性的情况。