Vanella Giuseppe, Hassan Cesare, De Bellis Mario, Giardini Maxemiliano, Grasso Enrico, Laterza Francesco, Tarantino Ottaviano, Di Giulio Emilio
Sant'Andrea Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Endosc Int Open. 2019 Nov;7(11):E1457-E1467. doi: 10.1055/a-0996-8118. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
A split-dose regimen for colonoscopy is recommended by international guidelines, but its adoption is still suboptimal. Our aim was to assess whether a Plan-Do-Study-Act approach (PDSA), a scientific method promoting quality improvement, would be able to improve adherence to a split-dose regimen, and to identify factors influencing its adoption. This study consisted of three phases: Cycle 1: a cross-sectional assessment of split-dose adherence in consecutive outpatients/inpatients undergoing colonoscopies in 74 Italian centers; Educational intervention: regional meetings with literature review, analysis of Cycle 1 data, and discussion on corrective measures; local diffusion of educational material and tools for improvement; Cycle 2: reassessment of split-dose adherence after spontaneous local interventions. Demographic, clinical, and procedural variables were systematically collected. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of split-dose adoption. In total, 8213 patients (mean age = 60.29 years (SD = 13.58), men = 54 %, outpatients = 88.4 %) were enrolled between 2013 and 2016 (Cycle 1 = 4189 patients and Cycle 2 = 4024 patients). Split-dose adoption rose from 29.1 % in Cycle 1 to 51.1 % in Cycle 2 ( < 0.0001), and being enrolled in Cycle 2 independently predicted split-dose adherence (OR = 2.9; 95 %CI 2.6 - 3.3). The adoption improved in all time slots, including colonoscopies scheduled before 0930. The main corrective measures were: rescheduling of colonoscopies after 0930 (between 0930 and 1130: OR = 2.6; 95 %CI 2.3 - 3.1; after 1130: OR = 7; 95 %CI 5.9 - 8.4); the cleansing regimen communicated by the Endoscopy unit (via form: OR = 1.6; 95 %CI 1.3 - 1.9; via visit: OR = 2.1; 95 %CI 1.7 - 2.5); a decrease in the use of deep sedation (OR = 2; 95 %CI 1.7 - 2.5). An educational intervention with observation-driven corrections through a PDSA approach was able to substantially increase the adoption of a split-dose regimen.
国际指南推荐采用分剂量方案进行结肠镜检查,但其采用率仍不尽人意。我们的目的是评估一种计划-执行-研究-行动方法(PDSA),一种促进质量改进的科学方法,是否能够提高对分剂量方案的依从性,并确定影响其采用的因素。 本研究包括三个阶段:第1周期:对意大利74个中心连续接受结肠镜检查的门诊/住院患者的分剂量依从性进行横断面评估;教育干预:召开区域会议,进行文献综述、分析第1周期数据,并讨论纠正措施;在当地传播教育材料和改进工具;第2周期:在当地自发干预后重新评估分剂量依从性。系统收集人口统计学、临床和操作变量。采用多因素逻辑回归分析确定分剂量采用的预测因素。 2013年至2016年共纳入8213例患者(平均年龄=60.29岁(标准差=13.58),男性=54%,门诊患者=88.4%)(第1周期=4189例患者,第2周期=4024例患者)。分剂量采用率从第1周期的29.1%升至第2周期的51.1%(<0.0001),纳入第2周期独立预测分剂量依从性(比值比=2.9;95%置信区间2.6-3.3)。所有时间段的采用率均有所提高,包括09:30之前安排的结肠镜检查。主要的纠正措施包括:将结肠镜检查重新安排在09:30之后(09:30至11:30之间:比值比=2.6;95%置信区间2.3-3.1;11:30之后:比值比=7;95%置信区间5.9-8.4);内镜科室传达的清洁方案(通过表格:比值比=1.6;95%置信区间1.3-1.9;通过查房:比值比=2.1;95%置信区间1.7-2.5);深度镇静使用的减少(比值比=2;95%置信区间1.7-2.5)。 通过PDSA方法进行的以观察为驱动的纠正的教育干预能够大幅提高分剂量方案的采用率。