• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在丙泊酚镇静下进行结肠镜检查时,采用聚乙二醇进行分剂量肠道准备。是否存在最佳时机?

Split-dose bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy performed under propofol sedation. Is there an optimal timing?

作者信息

Alghamry Alaa, Ponnuswamy Sureshkumar K, Agarwal Aditya, Moattar Hadi, Yerkovich Stephanie T, Vandeleur Ann E, Thomas James, Croese John, Rahman Tony, Hodgson Ruth

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Centre for Service and Quality Improvement, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, Queensland, Australia.

School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

J Dig Dis. 2017 Mar;18(3):160-168. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12458.

DOI:10.1111/1751-2980.12458
PMID:28188978
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Aspiration risk, especially with propofol sedation, remains a concern after split-dose bowel preparation of up to 1 L polyethylene glycol for the procedure. We aimed to identify the ideal timing of bowel preparation to achieve optimal colon cleansing with no increased risk of aspiration.

METHODS

A total of 892 consecutive patients undergoing simultaneous esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy were prospectively recruited. Residual gastric volume (RGV) and pH of gastric contents were measured at EGD, and patients' characteristics, runway time (duration between completion of the final liter of bowel preparation and colonoscopy commencement), and cleansing quality were recorded.

RESULTS

A shorter runway time resulted in better colon cleansing (r = -0.124, P < 0.001). No correlation between runway time and RGV or pH was found (r = -0.017, P = 0.62 and r = -0.030, P = 0.47, respectively). RGV and pH did not differ significantly with runway time of 4 or 5 h. RGV with runway time ≤3 h was 35.9 ± 11.8 mL and 17.4 ± 0.6 mL after runway time >3 h (P < 0.001). No aspiration pneumonia occurred. The only factors independently related to higher RGV were younger age and male sex.

CONCLUSIONS

The consumption of bowel preparation agent within 3-4 h before propofol sedation resulted in a similar RGV and pH as those achieved by more prolonged fasting, with no increased risk of aspiration even in patients perceived to be at high risk.

摘要

目的

在为该手术进行高达1升聚乙二醇的分剂量肠道准备后,误吸风险,尤其是丙泊酚镇静后的误吸风险,仍然令人担忧。我们旨在确定肠道准备的理想时机,以实现最佳的结肠清洁效果,同时不增加误吸风险。

方法

前瞻性招募了892例连续接受食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD)和结肠镜检查的患者。在EGD时测量残余胃容积(RGV)和胃内容物的pH值,并记录患者的特征、准备时间(最后一升肠道准备完成至结肠镜检查开始之间的持续时间)和清洁质量。

结果

较短的准备时间可带来更好的结肠清洁效果(r = -0.124,P < 0.001)。未发现准备时间与RGV或pH值之间存在相关性(分别为r = -0.017,P = 0.62和r = -0.030,P = 0.47)。RGV和pH值在4或5小时的准备时间下无显著差异。准备时间≤3小时时的RGV为35.9 ± 11.8毫升,准备时间>3小时后为17.4 ± 0.6毫升(P < 0.001)。未发生吸入性肺炎。与较高RGV独立相关的唯一因素是年龄较小和男性。

结论

在丙泊酚镇静前3 - 4小时内服用肠道准备剂,其RGV和pH值与更长时间禁食时相似,即使在被认为高风险的患者中也不会增加误吸风险。

相似文献

1
Split-dose bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy performed under propofol sedation. Is there an optimal timing?在丙泊酚镇静下进行结肠镜检查时,采用聚乙二醇进行分剂量肠道准备。是否存在最佳时机?
J Dig Dis. 2017 Mar;18(3):160-168. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12458.
2
Residual Gastric Volume After Bowel Preparation With Polyethylene Glycol for Elective Colonoscopy: A Prospective Observational Study.聚乙二醇肠道准备后择期结肠镜检查的残余胃容量:一项前瞻性观察研究。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2017 Apr;51(4):331-338. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000547.
3
Gastric residual volume after split-dose compared with evening-before polyethylene glycol bowel preparation.分剂量服用后胃残余量与前一晚服用聚乙二醇肠道准备剂后的比较。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Mar;83(3):574-80. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.081. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
4
Split-dose sodium picosulfate-magnesium citrate colonoscopy preparation achieves lower residual gastric volume with higher cleansing effectiveness than a previous-day regimen.分次服用的聚乙二醇4000-枸橼酸镁结肠镜检查准备方案比前一天的方案能实现更低的胃残余量,且清洁效果更好。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Mar;83(3):566-73. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.06.054. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
5
Safety of Large-Volume, Same-Day Oral Bowel Preparations During Deep Sedation: A Prospective Observational Study.深度镇静下大剂量当日口服肠道准备的安全性:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Anesth Analg. 2017 Aug;125(2):469-476. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001805.
6
Inadequate Bowel Cleansing Efficacy of Split-dose Polyethylene Glycol for Colonoscopy in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A Prospective and Blinded Study.分剂量聚乙二醇用于2型糖尿病患者结肠镜检查时肠道清洁效果不佳:一项前瞻性盲法研究
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2017 Mar;51(3):240-246. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000536.
7
A prospective audit of the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of low-volume polyethylene glycol (2 L) versus standard volume polyethylene glycol (4 L) versus magnesium citrate plus stimulant laxative as bowel preparation for colonoscopy.前瞻性研究低容量聚乙二醇(2L)与标准容量聚乙二醇(4L)、枸橼酸镁联合刺激性泻药在结肠镜检查前肠道准备中的疗效、安全性和可接受性。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012 Aug;46(7):595-601. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182432162.
8
Polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation before colonoscopy for selected inpatients: A pilot study.结肠镜检查前使用聚乙二醇的肠道准备在选定住院患者中的应用:一项初步研究。
J Dig Dis. 2018 Jan;19(1):40-47. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12571.
9
Morning-only polyethylene glycol is noninferior but less preferred by hospitalized patients as compared with split-dose bowel preparation.仅在早晨服用的聚乙二醇与分剂量肠道准备相比,效果不劣,但住院患者对此的偏好较低。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014 May-Jun;48(5):414-8. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31829f30e9.
10
Same-day bidirectional endoscopy with nonanesthesiologist administration of propofol: safety and cost-effectiveness compared with separated exams.非麻醉医师管理下的同日双向内镜检查与分开检查的安全性和成本效益比较:使用异丙酚。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Mar;26(3):301-8. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000026.

引用本文的文献

1
Shortening Oral Simethicone-to-Colonoscopy Interval Increases Bowel Preparation Quality.缩短口服西甲硅油与结肠镜检查的间隔时间可提高肠道准备质量。
Med Sci Monit. 2024 Jun 22;30:e943972. doi: 10.12659/MSM.943972.
2
An international multidisciplinary consensus statement on fasting before procedural sedation in adults and children.成人和儿童在程序镇静前禁食的国际多学科共识声明。
Anaesthesia. 2020 Mar;75(3):374-385. doi: 10.1111/anae.14892. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
3
IMPlementing split Regimen OVEr Single dose using a Plan-Do-Study-Act approach (IMPROVES study).
采用计划-实施-研究-改进方法实施分阶段方案而非单剂量方案(IMPROVES研究)。
Endosc Int Open. 2019 Nov;7(11):E1457-E1467. doi: 10.1055/a-0996-8118. Epub 2019 Oct 22.