Boisen Anne B, Løkkegaard Ellen C, Fuglsang Jens
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, North Zealand Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2019 May 1;4:100033. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100033. eCollection 2019 Oct.
Balloon catheter is the preferred method for induction of labor in women with prior cesarean section. We sought to evaluate the rate of vaginal delivery, induction-delivery time and outcome predictors after induction with double-balloon catheter.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study including women with prior cesarean section undergoing induction of labor with a double-balloon catheter during the period January 2007-June 2014 at a large, tertiary Danish university hospital. For comparison, we included women with no prior cesarean section undergoing induction with double-balloon catheter after failed medical induction. Inclusion criteria were singleton pregnancy, an unfavorable cervix, intact membranes, cephalic presentation and either previous cesarean section or failed medical induction of labor. Exclusion criteria included contraindications for vaginal delivery, severe fetal malformation and stillbirth. Study subjects were identified in a local computerized system and data extracted from the medical records.
Women with prior cesarean section ( = 304 induced with double-balloon catheter had a vaginal delivery rate of 50.3% (95% CI 44.7-55.9) compared to 51.7% (95% CI 39.2-64.1) in women with no prior cesarean section but preceding failed medical induction of labor ( = 58) ( = 0.85). BMI≥30 was associated with increased frequency of cesarean section. Median time from induction to vaginal delivery was 27.1(20.4-31.1) hours and 28.4(25.5-36.1) hours, respectively ( = 0.05). The rate of complete uterine rupture was 1.0%.
Similar success rates of approximately 50% for vaginal delivery were observed after induction of labor with a double-balloon catheter in women with and without prior caesarean section. A BMI ≥ 30 was associated with an increased frequency of caesarean section.
球囊导管是有剖宫产史女性引产的首选方法。我们试图评估双球囊导管引产术后的阴道分娩率、引产至分娩时间及结局预测因素。
我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了2007年1月至2014年6月期间在丹麦一家大型三级大学医院接受双球囊导管引产的有剖宫产史的女性。为作比较,我们纳入了药物引产失败后接受双球囊导管引产的无剖宫产史的女性。纳入标准为单胎妊娠、宫颈条件不佳、胎膜完整、头先露以及既往有剖宫产史或药物引产失败。排除标准包括阴道分娩禁忌症、严重胎儿畸形和死产。在当地计算机系统中识别研究对象,并从病历中提取数据。
有剖宫产史的女性(n = 304,接受双球囊导管引产)阴道分娩率为50.3%(95%CI 44.7 - 55.9),而无剖宫产史但药物引产失败后接受双球囊导管引产的女性(n = 58)阴道分娩率为51.7%(95%CI 39.2 - 64.1)(P = 0.85)。BMI≥30与剖宫产频率增加相关。引产至阴道分娩的中位时间分别为27.1(20.4 - 31.1)小时和28.4(25.5 - 36.1)小时(P = 0.05)。完全子宫破裂率为1.0%。
有和无既往剖宫产史的女性使用双球囊导管引产术后,阴道分娩成功率相似,约为50%。BMI≥30与剖宫产频率增加相关。