• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

尿液代谢组学检测与其他结直肠癌筛查策略的比较效果和成本效益分析。

Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis of a urine metabolomics test vs. alternative colorectal cancer screening strategies.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Metabolomic Technologies Inc., Suite 132, 9650 20 Avenue, Edmonton, AB, T6R 3T2, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019 Nov;34(11):1953-1962. doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03419-7. Epub 2019 Nov 1.

DOI:10.1007/s00384-019-03419-7
PMID:31673772
Abstract

PURPOSE

Despite the success of provincial screening programs, colorectal cancer (CRC) is still the third most common cancer in Canada and the second most common cause of cancer-related death. Fecal-based tests, such as fecal occult blood test (FOBT) and fecal immunochemical test (FIT), form the foundation of the provincial CRC screening programs in Canada. However, those tests have low sensitivity for CRC precursors, adenomatous polyps and have low adherence. This study evaluated the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a new urine metabolomic-based test (UMT) that detects adenomatous polyps and CRC.

METHODS

A Markov model was designed using data from the literature and provincial healthcare databases for Canadian at average risk for CRC; calibration was performed against statistics data. Screening strategies included the following: FOBT every year, FIT every year, colonoscopy every 10 years, and UMT every year. The costs, quality adjusted life years (QALY) gained, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for each strategy were estimated and compared.

RESULTS

Compared with no screening, a UMT strategy reduced CRC mortality by 49.9% and gained 0.15 life years per person at $42,325/life year gained in the base case analysis. FOBT reduced CRC mortality by 14.9% and gained 0.04 life years per person at $25,011/life year gained. FIT reduced CRC mortality by 35.8% and gained 0.11 life years per person at $25,500/life year while colonoscopy reduced CRC mortality by 24.7% and gained 0.08 life years per person at $50,875/life year.

CONCLUSIONS

A UMT strategy might be a cost-effective strategy when used in programmatic CRC screening programs.

摘要

目的

尽管省级筛查计划取得了成功,但结直肠癌(CRC)仍是加拿大第三大常见癌症,也是癌症相关死亡的第二大主要原因。粪便检测,如粪便潜血试验(FOBT)和粪便免疫化学试验(FIT),构成了加拿大省级 CRC 筛查计划的基础。然而,这些检测方法对 CRC 前体(腺瘤性息肉)的敏感性较低,且依从性较低。本研究评估了一种新的基于尿液代谢组学的检测方法(UMT)检测腺瘤性息肉和 CRC 的有效性和成本效益。

方法

使用文献和省级医疗保健数据库中的数据为加拿大平均 CRC 风险人群设计了一个马尔可夫模型;通过统计数据对模型进行了校准。筛查策略包括:每年进行一次 FOBT、每年进行一次 FIT、每 10 年进行一次结肠镜检查和每年进行一次 UMT。对每种策略的成本、质量调整生命年(QALY)获益和增量成本效益比(ICER)进行了估计和比较。

结果

与不筛查相比,UMT 策略可使 CRC 死亡率降低 49.9%,每人获得 0.15 个生命年,在基本情况下分析,每获得 1 个生命年的成本为 42325 美元。FOBT 可使 CRC 死亡率降低 14.9%,每人获得 0.04 个生命年,每获得 1 个生命年的成本为 25011 美元。FIT 可使 CRC 死亡率降低 35.8%,每人获得 0.11 个生命年,每获得 1 个生命年的成本为 25500 美元,而结肠镜检查可使 CRC 死亡率降低 24.7%,每人获得 0.08 个生命年,每获得 1 个生命年的成本为 50875 美元。

结论

UMT 策略在结直肠癌筛查计划中可能是一种具有成本效益的策略。

相似文献

1
Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis of a urine metabolomics test vs. alternative colorectal cancer screening strategies.尿液代谢组学检测与其他结直肠癌筛查策略的比较效果和成本效益分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019 Nov;34(11):1953-1962. doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03419-7. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
2
Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer.结直肠癌混合筛查策略的健康获益和成本效益。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Sep;11(9):1158-66. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.03.013. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
3
Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.筛查结肠镜检查与乙状结肠镜检查和其他策略的比较效果和成本效益。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan;108(1):120-32. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.380. Epub 2012 Dec 18.
4
Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of colorectal cancer screenings in a low- and middle-income country: example from Thailand.在中低收入国家进行结直肠癌筛查的成本效益和预算影响分析:来自泰国的例子。
J Med Econ. 2019 Dec;22(12):1351-1361. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1674065. Epub 2019 Oct 12.
5
Comparative Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of a Multitarget Stool DNA Test to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia.多靶点粪便 DNA 检测筛查结直肠肿瘤的有效性和成本效益比较。
Gastroenterology. 2016 Sep;151(3):427-439.e6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
6
Cost-effectiveness simulation and analysis of colorectal cancer screening in Hong Kong Chinese population: comparison amongst colonoscopy, guaiac and immunologic fecal occult blood testing.香港华人人群中结直肠癌筛查的成本效益模拟与分析:结肠镜检查、愈创木脂法和免疫粪便潜血检测的比较
BMC Cancer. 2015 Oct 15;15:705. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1730-y.
7
Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population.普通人群中结直肠癌筛查的成本效益
JAMA. 2000 Oct 18;284(15):1954-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.15.1954.
8
Contrasting Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Under Commercial Insurance vs. Medicare.商业保险与医疗保险下结直肠癌筛查的效果和成本效益对比。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Dec;113(12):1836-1847. doi: 10.1038/s41395-018-0106-8. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
9
Screening for Colorectal Cancer With Fecal Immunochemical Testing With and Without Postpolypectomy Surveillance Colonoscopy: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.粪便免疫化学检测联合或不联合息肉切除术后监测结肠镜检查用于结直肠癌筛查的成本效果分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Oct 17;167(8):544-554. doi: 10.7326/M16-2891. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
10
Comparative Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening With Blood-Based Biomarkers (Liquid Biopsy) vs Fecal Tests or Colonoscopy.基于血液生物标志物(液体活检)的结直肠癌筛查与粪便检测或结肠镜检查的比较有效性和成本效益。
Gastroenterology. 2024 Jul;167(2):378-391. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.03.011. Epub 2024 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Cracking the Code of Colorectal Cancer Screening: An Overview With a Focus on Current and Emerging Screening Methods.破解结直肠癌筛查密码:聚焦当前及新兴筛查方法的概述
Cureus. 2025 May 24;17(5):e84724. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84724. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Potential of pre-diagnostic metabolomics for colorectal cancer risk assessment or early detection.诊断前代谢组学在结直肠癌风险评估或早期检测中的潜力。
NPJ Precis Oncol. 2024 Oct 27;8(1):244. doi: 10.1038/s41698-024-00732-5.
3
Optimal Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening.结直肠癌筛查的最佳策略。

本文引用的文献

1
Patterns and predictors of repeat fecal immunochemical and occult blood test screening in four large health care systems in the United States.美国四个大型医疗保健系统中重复粪便免疫化学和潜血检测筛查的模式和预测因素。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 May;113(5):746-754. doi: 10.1038/s41395-018-0023-x. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
2
Patterns and predictors of adherence to colorectal cancer screening recommendations in Alberta's Tomorrow Project participants stratified by risk.按风险分层的艾伯塔省明日计划参与者对结直肠癌筛查建议的依从模式和预测因素。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jan 25;18(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5095-4.
3
Cancer statistics, 2018.
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2022 Apr;23(4):474-493. doi: 10.1007/s11864-022-00962-4. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
4
Use of Omics Technologies for the Detection of Colorectal Cancer Biomarkers.组学技术在检测结直肠癌生物标志物中的应用。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Feb 6;14(3):817. doi: 10.3390/cancers14030817.
5
Towards Novel Non-Invasive Colorectal Cancer Screening Methods: A Comprehensive Review.迈向新型非侵入性结直肠癌筛查方法:全面综述
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Apr 10;13(8):1820. doi: 10.3390/cancers13081820.
癌症统计数据,2018 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jan;68(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21442. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
4
Development and Validation of a High-Throughput Mass Spectrometry Based Urine Metabolomic Test for the Detection of Colonic Adenomatous Polyps.基于高通量质谱的尿液代谢组学检测方法用于检测结肠腺瘤性息肉的开发与验证
Metabolites. 2017 Jun 22;7(3):32. doi: 10.3390/metabo7030032.
5
CMOST: an open-source framework for the microsimulation of colorectal cancer screening strategies.CMOST:一种用于结直肠癌筛查策略微观模拟的开源框架。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Jun 5;17(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0458-9.
6
Colorectal Cancer Screening: Recommendations for Physicians and Patients from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.结直肠癌筛查:美国多学会专家组对医生和患者的建议。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jul;112(7):1016-1030. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.174. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
7
Public health impact of colonoscopy use on colorectal cancer mortality in Germany and the United States.结肠镜检查在德国和美国对结直肠癌死亡率的公共卫生影响。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jan;87(1):213-221.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
8
Sessile Serrated Polyps and Colon Cancer Prevention.无蒂锯齿状息肉与结肠癌预防
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2017 May;10(5):270-278. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-16-0264. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
9
Colorectal cancer statistics, 2017.结直肠癌统计数据,2017 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 May 6;67(3):177-193. doi: 10.3322/caac.21395. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
10
Comparative effectiveness of screening strategies for colorectal cancer.结直肠癌筛查策略的比较效果
Cancer. 2017 May 1;123(9):1516-1527. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30518. Epub 2017 Jan 24.