Suppr超能文献

迈向新型非侵入性结直肠癌筛查方法:全面综述

Towards Novel Non-Invasive Colorectal Cancer Screening Methods: A Comprehensive Review.

作者信息

Ferrari Allegra, Neefs Isabelle, Hoeck Sarah, Peeters Marc, Van Hal Guido

机构信息

Social Epidemiology and Health Policy, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerpen, Belgium.

Center for Oncological Research (CORE), University of Antwerp and Antwerp University Hospital, 2610 Antwerpen, Belgium.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2021 Apr 10;13(8):1820. doi: 10.3390/cancers13081820.

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading cancer-related causes of death in the world. Since the 70s, many countries have adopted different CRC screening programs, which has resulted in a decrease in mortality. However, current screening test options still present downsides. The commercialized stool-based tests present high false-positive rates and low sensitivity, which negatively affects the detection of early stage carcinogenesis. The gold standard colonoscopy has low uptake due to its invasiveness and the perception of discomfort and embarrassment that the procedure may bring. In this review, we collected and described the latest data about alternative CRC screening techniques that can overcome these disadvantages. Web of Science and PubMed were employed as search engines for studies reporting on CRC screening tests and future perspectives. The searches generated 555 articles, of which 93 titles were selected. Finally, a total of 50 studies, describing 14 different CRC alternative tests, were included. Among the investigated techniques, the main feature that could have an impact on CRC screening perception and uptake was the ease of sample collection. Urine, exhaled breath, and blood-based tests promise to achieve good diagnostic performance (sensitivity of 63-100%, 90-95%, and 47-97%, respectively) while minimizing stress and discomfort for the patient.

摘要

结直肠癌(CRC)是全球癌症相关的主要死亡原因之一。自70年代以来,许多国家都采用了不同的CRC筛查计划,这使得死亡率有所下降。然而,目前的筛查测试选项仍然存在缺点。商业化的基于粪便的测试呈现出高假阳性率和低灵敏度,这对早期癌变的检测产生了负面影响。金标准结肠镜检查由于其侵入性以及该操作可能带来的不适和尴尬感,其接受度较低。在这篇综述中,我们收集并描述了有关可克服这些缺点的替代CRC筛查技术的最新数据。使用Web of Science和PubMed作为搜索引擎,搜索关于CRC筛查测试和未来前景的研究报告。搜索共产生555篇文章,其中93篇标题被选中。最后,总共纳入了50项研究,描述了14种不同的CRC替代测试。在所研究的技术中,可能会对CRC筛查认知和接受度产生影响的主要特征是样本采集的简便性。尿液、呼出气体和基于血液的测试有望在将患者的压力和不适降至最低的同时,实现良好的诊断性能(灵敏度分别为63 - 100%、90 - 95%和47 - 97%)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3294/8070308/41b752e2032e/cancers-13-01820-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验