Laboratory of Malaria and Vector Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 12735 Twinbrook Parkway, Rockville, MD 20852, USA; University of Georgia, Savannah River Ecology Lab, Savannah River Site, Building 737-A, Aiken, SC 29808, USA.
Laboratory of Malaria and Vector Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 12735 Twinbrook Parkway, Rockville, MD 20852, USA; Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Department of Vector and Parasite Biology, 503 Robert Grant Road, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA.
Curr Biol. 2019 Nov 18;29(22):3946-3952.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.09.047. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
Globally, diseases transmitted by arthropod vectors, such as mosquitoes, remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality [1]. The defense responses of mosquito and other arthropod vectors against parasites are important for understanding disease transmission dynamics and for the development of novel disease-control strategies. Consequently, the mechanisms by which mosquitoes resist parasitic infection (e.g., immune-mediated killing) have long been studied [2, 3]. However, the ability of mosquitoes to ameliorate the negative fitness consequences of infection through tolerance mechanisms (e.g., tissue repair) has been virtually ignored (but see [4, 5]). Ignoring parasite tolerance is especially taxing in vector biology because unlike resistance, which typically reduces vectorial capacity, tolerance is expected to increase vectorial capacity by reducing parasite-mediated mortality without killing parasites [6], contributing to the recurrent emergence of vector-borne diseases and its stabilization and exacerbation. Despite its importance, there is currently no evidence for the evolution of tolerance in natural mosquito populations. Here, we use a common-garden experimental framework to measure variation in resistance and tolerance to dog heartworm (Dirofilaria immitis) between eight natural Aedes albopictus mosquito populations representing areas of low and high transmission intensity. We find significant inter-population variation in tolerance and elevated tolerance where transmission intensity is high. Additionally, as expected, we find that increased tolerance is associated with higher vectorial capacity. Consequently, our results indicate that high transmission intensity can lead to the evolution of more competent disease vectors, which can feed back to impact disease risk.
在全球范围内,节肢动物传播的疾病(如蚊子)仍然是发病率和死亡率的主要原因[1]。蚊子和其他节肢动物传播媒介对寄生虫的防御反应对于理解疾病传播动态和开发新的疾病控制策略非常重要。因此,蚊子抵抗寄生虫感染的机制(例如免疫介导的杀伤)长期以来一直受到研究[2,3]。然而,蚊子通过耐受机制(例如组织修复)减轻感染的负面适应后果的能力几乎被忽视了(但见[4,5])。在媒介生物学中忽略寄生虫耐受尤其具有挑战性,因为与通常降低媒介能力的抗性不同,耐受预计会通过降低寄生虫介导的死亡率而不杀死寄生虫来增加媒介能力[6],导致媒介传播疾病的反复出现及其稳定和恶化。尽管其重要性,但目前没有证据表明自然蚊虫种群中存在耐受的进化。在这里,我们使用常见的花园实验框架来衡量代表低和高传播强度的八个自然白纹伊蚊种群对狗心丝虫(Dirofilaria immitis)的抗性和耐受的变化。我们发现耐受和高传播强度下的耐受能力存在显著的种群间变异。此外,正如预期的那样,我们发现,更高的耐受性与更高的媒介能力有关。因此,我们的结果表明,高传播强度会导致更具传染性的疾病媒介的进化,这会反馈并影响疾病风险。