Jerant Anthony, Sciolla Andrés F, Henderson Mark C, Griffin Erin, Talamantes Efrain, Fancher Tonya, Franks Peter
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2019;30(4):1419-1432. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2019.0095.
We previously reported that medical school matriculants with higher scores on a continuous measure of socioeconomic disadvantage (SED) had worse academic performance than those with lower scores. Analyses examining performance concurrently by SED and self-designated disadvantage (SDA) are lacking, an important gap since SDA may reflect perceptions only partly shaped by SED. We examined the associations of the four possible combinations of SED and SDA categories-SED+/SDA+, SED+/SDA-, and SED-/SDA+ (versus SED-/SDA-as reference)-with U.S. Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 and 2 Clinical Knowledge performance and third-year clerkship Honors at one medical school. USMLE scores were lower than reference for SED+/SDA+ and SED-/SDA+ (but not SED+/SDA-) students. SED+/SDA+, SED+/SDA-, and SED-/SDA+ students all received fewer Honors than reference. The findings indicate SED and SDA each predict different features of medical school performance, suggesting avenues for enhancing disadvantaged students' success and the representativeness of the physician workforce.
我们之前曾报道,在社会经济劣势(SED)连续测量中得分较高的医学院录取新生,其学业表现比得分较低的新生更差。目前缺乏同时按SED和自我认定的劣势(SDA)来分析表现的研究,这是一个重要的空白,因为SDA可能仅部分反映受SED影响的认知。我们研究了SED和SDA类别(SED+/SDA+、SED+/SDA-和SED-/SDA+,以SED-/SDA-作为对照)的四种可能组合与一所医学院的美国医师执照考试(USMLE)第一步和第二步临床知识表现以及三年级见习荣誉之间的关联。对于SED+/SDA+和SED-/SDA+(但不包括SED+/SDA-)的学生,USMLE分数低于对照。SED+/SDA+、SED+/SDA-和SED-/SDA+的学生获得的荣誉都比对照少。研究结果表明,SED和SDA各自预测医学院表现的不同特征,为提高弱势学生的成功率和医师队伍的代表性提供了途径。