Scott Alex J, Drevin Gustaf, Pavlović Lordan, Nilsson Magnus, Krige Jake Ej, Jonas Eduard
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019 Oct 15;10:855-866. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S216027. eCollection 2019.
To evaluate and compare medical student and faculty perceptions of undergraduate surgical training and compare results between South Africa and Sweden.
An electronic, online questionnaire was anonymously distributed to medical students and surgical faculty at the University of Cape Town (UCT), South Africa, and the Karolinska Institutet (KI), Sweden. The questionnaire explored the perceptions of medical students and surgical faculty regarding the current undergraduate surgical curriculum, as well as existing clinical and theoretical instructional methods.
A total of 120 students (response rate of 24.4%) and 41 faculty (response rate of 74.5%) responded. Students believed they ought to receive significantly more teaching when compared to surgical faculty (=0.018). Students and faculty generally agreed that students should expect to study approximately six to 20 hrs per week outside of clinical duty. There was general agreement that "small-group tutorials" was the area students learn the most from, whereas students reported "lectures" least helpful. Registrars were reported as the first person students should consult regarding patient care. Fifty-one (42.5%) medical students believed that faculty viewed students as an inconvenience, and 42 (35.0%) students believed that faculty would rather not have students on the clinical team. The majority of faculty (68.3%) reported significantly more negative views on the current undergraduate surgical curriculum when compared to students (=0.002). UCT faculty reported giving significantly less feedback to students during their surgical rotation when compared to KI faculty (=0.043).
Significant differences exist between surgical faculty and medical student perceptions regarding undergraduate surgical training in developing and developed countries. In order to increase surgical interest among undergraduate medical students, it is imperative for surgical educators to be aware of these differences and find specific strategies to bridge this gap.
评估并比较医学生和教师对本科外科培训的看法,并比较南非和瑞典的结果。
通过电子在线问卷,对南非开普敦大学(UCT)和瑞典卡罗林斯卡学院(KI)的医学生和外科教师进行匿名调查。问卷探讨了医学生和外科教师对当前本科外科课程以及现有临床和理论教学方法的看法。
共有120名学生(回复率为24.4%)和41名教师(回复率为74.5%)做出回复。学生认为与外科教师相比,他们应该接受更多的教学(P = 0.018)。学生和教师普遍认为,学生在临床工作之余每周应学习约6至20小时。大家普遍认为“小组辅导课”是学生收获最多的领域,而学生报告称“讲座”最没有帮助。报告显示,住院医生是学生在患者护理方面应首先咨询的人员。51名(42.5%)医学生认为教师将学生视为麻烦,42名(35.0%)学生认为教师宁愿临床团队中没有学生。与学生相比,大多数教师(68.3%)对当前本科外科课程的负面看法明显更多(P = 0.002)。与KI教师相比,UCT教师在学生外科轮转期间给学生的反馈明显更少(P = 0.043)。
在发展中国家和发达国家,外科教师和医学生对本科外科培训的看法存在显著差异。为了提高本科医学生对外科的兴趣,外科教育工作者必须意识到这些差异,并找到具体策略来弥合这一差距。