Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, 10099, Berlin, Germany.
Neuroimage. 2020 Feb 15;207:116117. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116117. Epub 2019 Nov 2.
Combining EEG with eye-tracking is a promising approach to study neural correlates of natural vision, but the resulting recordings are also heavily contaminated by activity of the eye balls, eye lids, and extraocular muscles. While Independent Component Analysis (ICA) is commonly used to suppress these ocular artifacts, its performance under free viewing conditions has not been systematically evaluated and many published reports contain residual artifacts. Here I evaluated and optimized ICA-based correction for two tasks with unconstrained eye movements: visual search in images and sentence reading. In a first step, four parameters of the ICA pipeline were varied orthogonally: the (1) high-pass and (2) low-pass filter applied to the training data, (3) the proportion of training data containing myogenic saccadic spike potentials (SP), and (4) the threshold for eye tracker-based component rejection. In a second step, the eye-tracker was used to objectively quantify the correction quality of each ICA solution, both in terms of undercorrection (residual artifacts) and overcorrection (removal of neurogenic activity). As a benchmark, results were compared to those obtained with an alternative spatial filter, Multiple Source Eye Correction (MSEC). With commonly used settings, Infomax ICA not only left artifacts in the data, but also distorted neurogenic activity during eye movement-free intervals. However, correction results could be strongly improved by training the ICA on optimally filtered data in which SPs were massively overweighted. With optimized procedures, ICA removed virtually all artifacts, including the SP and its associated spectral broadband artifact from both viewing paradigms, with little distortion of neural activity. It also outperformed MSEC in terms of SP correction. Matlab code is provided.
将脑电图与眼动追踪相结合是研究自然视觉神经相关性的一种很有前途的方法,但由此产生的记录也受到眼球、眼睑和眼外肌活动的严重干扰。尽管独立成分分析 (ICA) 常用于抑制这些眼动伪迹,但它在自由观察条件下的性能尚未得到系统评估,许多已发表的报告都包含残留的伪迹。在这里,我评估并优化了两种具有非约束性眼球运动任务的基于 ICA 的校正方法:图像视觉搜索和句子阅读。在第一步中,我正交地改变了 ICA 管道的四个参数:(1)应用于训练数据的高通和低通滤波器,(2)包含肌源性扫视尖峰电位 (SP) 的训练数据的比例,以及(3)基于眼动追踪器的组件拒绝的阈值。在第二步中,使用眼动追踪器客观地量化了每个 ICA 解决方案的校正质量,无论是在欠校正(残留伪迹)还是过校正(去除神经源性活动)方面。作为基准,将结果与替代空间滤波器(多源眼校正 (MSEC))获得的结果进行了比较。使用常用的设置,Infomax ICA 不仅在数据中留下了伪迹,而且在眼动自由间隔期间还扭曲了神经源性活动。然而,通过在最佳滤波数据上训练 ICA 可以极大地改进校正结果,其中 SP 被大量加权。使用优化的程序,ICA 去除了几乎所有的伪迹,包括来自两种观察范式的 SP 及其相关的宽带谱伪迹,而对神经活动的扭曲很小。它在 SP 校正方面也优于 MSEC。提供了 Matlab 代码。