Suppr超能文献

以照顾者为中心的沟通问卷(CCCQ)的设计和初步测试。

Design and Preliminary Testing of the Caregiver-Centered Communication Questionnaire (CCCQ).

机构信息

Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Henrietta Szold Hadassah-Hebrew, University School of Nursing, Hashmonaim, Israel.

出版信息

J Palliat Care. 2020 Jul;35(3):154-160. doi: 10.1177/0825859719887239. Epub 2019 Nov 7.

Abstract

The study objective was to develop and test a new survey instrument that measures caregiver-centered communication. We developed a questionnaire inspired by the National Cancer Institute framework on patient-centered communication, focusing on family caregiver communication for this tool. The questionnaire includes 5 subscales: exchange of information, relationship with team, emotions, managing care, and decision-making. The initial questionnaire was reviewed by domain experts for face validity and edited further to include 30 items. We administered the modified questionnaire to 115 family caregivers of patients with serious illness in various settings. Cronbach α for the entire scale was 0.97 and ranged from 0.82 to 0.93 for the 5 subscales. Participants found that the survey addressed important concepts and that items were in most cases easy to understand. This instrument provides a structured way to assess caregiver-centered communication, addressing a pressing need for tools that measure the extent to which communication is responsive to the needs and preferences of family caregivers. Further testing and refinement are needed to improve the ease of use and examine the reliability and validity of this measure.

摘要

研究目的是开发和测试一种新的调查工具,用于测量以照顾者为中心的沟通。我们受美国国立癌症研究所患者为中心的沟通框架启发,为该工具开发了一个以家庭照顾者沟通为重点的问卷。问卷包括 5 个分量表:信息交流、与团队的关系、情绪、护理管理和决策制定。初始问卷由领域专家进行了内容有效性审查,并进一步编辑,纳入了 30 个项目。我们向不同环境中 115 名重病患者的家庭照顾者发放了修改后的问卷。整个量表的 Cronbach α 为 0.97,5 个分量表的范围为 0.82 至 0.93。参与者认为该调查涵盖了重要的概念,并且大多数情况下,项目都易于理解。该工具提供了一种评估以照顾者为中心的沟通的结构化方法,满足了对能够衡量沟通对家庭照顾者的需求和偏好的响应程度的工具的迫切需求。需要进一步测试和完善,以提高易用性,并检验该测量方法的可靠性和有效性。

相似文献

1
Design and Preliminary Testing of the Caregiver-Centered Communication Questionnaire (CCCQ).
J Palliat Care. 2020 Jul;35(3):154-160. doi: 10.1177/0825859719887239. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
2
Reliability and Validity Testing of the Caregiver-Centered Communication Questionnaire.
J Nurs Meas. 2023 Sep 1;31(3):439-447. doi: 10.1891/JNM-2022-0044. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
3
Development and Initial Validation of the Caregiver Perceptions About Communication With Clinical Team Members (CAPACITY) Measure.
Med Care Res Rev. 2019 Dec;76(6):784-806. doi: 10.1177/1077558717747985. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
4
The Caregiver Burden Questionnaire for Heart Failure (CBQ-HF): face and content validity.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 May 25;11:84. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-84.
5
Refinement of the Shared Care Instrument-Revised: a measure of a family care interaction.
J Nurs Meas. 2008;16(1):43-60. doi: 10.1891/1061-3749.16.1.43.
6
Assessing Family Caregiver Communication in Chronic Illness: Validation of the FCCT-CI.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2023 May;40(5):500-507. doi: 10.1177/10499091221106694. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
7
Building a Rehabilitative Care Measurement Instrument to Improve the Patient Experience.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Jan;100(1):39-44. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.05.022. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
10
Psychometric Validation of the Heart Failure Caregiver Questionnaire (HF-CQ).
Patient. 2017 Oct;10(5):579-592. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0228-x.

引用本文的文献

4
Experiences and support needs of informal long-distance caregivers at the end of life: a scoping review.
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 21;13(4):e068175. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068175.
5
Close but Not Close Enough: How Distance Caregiving is Associated with Hospice Family Caregiver Hospice Communication Experiences.
Health Commun. 2024 Mar;39(3):482-492. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2023.2170199. Epub 2023 Jan 22.
6
Family caregiving experiences with hospice lung cancer patients compared to other cancer types.
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2023;41(2):210-225. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2022.2101907. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
8
Reliability and Validity Testing of the Caregiver-Centered Communication Questionnaire.
J Nurs Meas. 2023 Sep 1;31(3):439-447. doi: 10.1891/JNM-2022-0044. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
9
Patient-caregiver communication concordance in cancer-refinement of the Cancer Communication Assessment Tool in an Australian sample.
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Sep;30(9):7387-7396. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07163-7. Epub 2022 May 25.
10
Understanding and Supporting Informal Cancer Caregivers.
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2022 Apr;23(4):494-513. doi: 10.1007/s11864-022-00955-3. Epub 2022 Mar 14.

本文引用的文献

3
Challenges and Strategies for Hospice Caregivers: A Qualitative Analysis.
Gerontologist. 2017 Aug 1;57(4):648-656. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnw054.
4
Validation of a model of family caregiver communication types and related caregiver outcomes.
Palliat Support Care. 2017 Feb;15(1):3-11. doi: 10.1017/S1478951516000109. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
5
Determinants of Effective Caregiver Communication After Adolescent Traumatic Brain Injury.
PM R. 2015 Aug;7(8):836-844. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.02.004. Epub 2015 Feb 14.
6
A systematic review of telehealth tools and interventions to support family caregivers.
J Telemed Telecare. 2015 Jan;21(1):37-44. doi: 10.1177/1357633X14562734. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
7
The validity and reliability of the 'Cancer Caregiving Tasks, Consequences and Needs Questionnaire' (CaTCoN).
Acta Oncol. 2014 Jul;53(7):966-74. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2014.888496. Epub 2014 Mar 16.
8
Improved Strain and Psychosocial Outcomes for Caregivers of Individuals with Dementia: Findings from Project ANSWERS.
Gerontologist. 2013 Apr;53(2):280-92. doi: 10.1093/geront/gns076. Epub 2012 Aug 16.
9
ResearchMatch: a national registry to recruit volunteers for clinical research.
Acad Med. 2012 Jan;87(1):66-73. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31823ab7d2.
10
The family conference in oncology: benefits for the patient, family, and physician.
Semin Oncol. 2011 Jun;38(3):407-12. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2011.03.011.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验