• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evidence of potential overdiagnosis and overtreatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents: protocol for a scoping review.儿童和青少年注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)潜在过度诊断和过度治疗的证据:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 7;9(11):e032327. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032327.
2
Overdiagnosis of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Scoping Review.儿童和青少年注意缺陷多动障碍的过度诊断:系统范围综述。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e215335. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.5335.
3
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.从婴儿和新生儿获取器官或组织用于移植、研究或商业目的的伦理问题:生物伦理学范围审查方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Relationships between experimental task and questionnaire measures of reward/punishment sensitivity in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): protocol for a scoping review.注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)中实验任务与问卷测量奖励/惩罚敏感性的关系:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 13;14(2):e078026. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078026.
6
Barriers to and enablers of the transition from child and adolescent to adult mental health services for autistic young people and/or those with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: protocol for a scoping review.自闭症青年和/或注意力缺陷多动障碍患者从儿童和青少年精神卫生服务过渡到成人精神卫生服务的障碍和促进因素:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 17;14(8):e083373. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083373.
7
Mapping the landscape and evidence of cross-sectoral collaboration models targeting individuals referred for assessment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder or autism spectrum disorder: protocol for a scoping review.绘制针对被转介进行注意力缺陷多动障碍或自闭症谱系障碍评估的个体的跨部门协作模式的概况及证据:一项范围综述的方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 15;15(1):e088850. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088850.
8
Patient and public involvement in the development of clinical practice guidelines: a scoping review protocol.患者及公众参与临床实践指南制定:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 5;10(10):e037327. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037327.
9
Shared symptomatology between atopic dermatitis, ADHD and autism spectrum disorder: a protocol for a systematic scoping review.特应性皮炎、ADHD 和自闭症谱系障碍的共同症状:系统范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 25;14(6):e081280. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081280.
10
Psychosocial functioning of adolescents with ADHD in the family, school and peer group: A scoping review protocol.青少年 ADHD 在家庭、学校和同伴群体中的心理社会功能:范围综述方案。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 17;17(6):e0269495. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269495. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Overdiagnosis of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Scoping Review.儿童和青少年注意缺陷多动障碍的过度诊断:系统范围综述。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e215335. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.5335.

本文引用的文献

1
Recognizing the Potential for Overdiagnosis: Are High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin Assays an Example?认识过度诊断的可能性:高敏心肌肌钙蛋白检测是否就是一个例子?
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Feb 19;170(4):259-261. doi: 10.7326/M18-2645. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
2
Twenty-Year Trends in Diagnosed Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Among US Children and Adolescents, 1997-2016.20 年来美国儿童和青少年被诊断为注意缺陷多动障碍的趋势,1997-2016 年。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Aug 3;1(4):e181471. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1471.
3
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
4
Defining, Estimating, and Communicating Overdiagnosis in Cancer Screening.癌症筛查中的过度诊断定义、估计和沟通。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Jul 3;169(1):36-43. doi: 10.7326/M18-0694. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
5
Are ADHD medications under or over prescribed worldwide?: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.全球范围内注意力缺陷多动障碍药物的处方是不足还是过度?:一项系统评价与荟萃分析的方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jun;97(24):e10923. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010923.
6
Methylphenidate for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents - assessment of adverse events in non-randomised studies.用于治疗儿童和青少年注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的哌甲酯——非随机研究中不良事件的评估
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 9;5(5):CD012069. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012069.pub2.
7
Technology-assisted title and abstract screening for systematic reviews: a retrospective evaluation of the Abstrackr machine learning tool.技术辅助的系统评价标题和摘要筛选:Abstrackr 机器学习工具的回顾性评估。
Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 12;7(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0707-8.
8
Has the attention deficit hyperactivity disorder phenotype become more common in children between 2004 and 2014? Trends over 10 years from a Swedish general population sample.2004 年至 2014 年间,儿童注意缺陷多动障碍表型是否变得更为常见?来自瑞典一般人群样本的 10 年趋势。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2018 Aug;59(8):863-871. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12882. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
9
Overdiagnosis: what it is and what it isn't.过度诊断:是什么以及不是什么。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2018 Feb;23(1):1-3. doi: 10.1136/ebmed-2017-110886.
10
Prevalence of Parent-Reported ADHD Diagnosis and Associated Treatment Among U.S. Children and Adolescents, 2016.2016 年美国儿童和青少年父母报告的 ADHD 诊断患病率及相关治疗情况。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2018 Mar-Apr;47(2):199-212. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2017.1417860. Epub 2018 Jan 24.

儿童和青少年注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)潜在过度诊断和过度治疗的证据:一项范围综述方案

Evidence of potential overdiagnosis and overtreatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents: protocol for a scoping review.

作者信息

Kazda Luise, Bell Katy, Thomas Rae, McGeechan Kevin, Barratt Alexandra

机构信息

Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 7;9(11):e032327. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032327.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032327
PMID:31699747
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6858259/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Worldwide, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) diagnosis rates in children and adolescents have been increasing consistently over the past decades, fuelling a debate about the underlying reasons for this trend. While many hypothesise that a substantial number of these additional cases are overdiagnosed, to date there has been no comprehensive evaluation of evidence for or against this hypothesis. Thus, with this scoping review we aim to synthesise published evidence on the topic in order to investigate whether existing literature is consistent with the occurrence of overdiagnosis and/or overtreatment of ADHD in children and adolescents.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The proposed scoping review will be conducted in the context of a framework of five questions, developed specifically to identify areas in medicine with the potential for overdiagnosis and overtreatment. The review will adhere to the Joanna Briggs Methodology for Scoping Reviews. We will search Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library electronic databases for primary studies published in English from 1979 onwards. We will also conduct forward and backward citation searches of included articles. Data from studies that meet our predefined exclusion and inclusion criteria will be charted into a standardised extraction template with results mapped to our predetermined five-question framework in the form of a table and summarised in narrative form.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The proposed study is a scoping review of the existing literature and as such does not require ethics approval. We intend to disseminate the results from the scoping review through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and through conference presentations. Further, we will use the findings from our scoping review to inform future research to fill key evidence gaps identified by this review.

摘要

引言

在全球范围内,儿童和青少年注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的诊断率在过去几十年中持续上升,引发了关于这一趋势潜在原因的争论。虽然许多人推测这些新增病例中有相当一部分是过度诊断,但迄今为止,尚未对支持或反对这一假设的证据进行全面评估。因此,通过本范围综述,我们旨在综合该主题已发表的证据,以调查现有文献是否与儿童和青少年ADHD的过度诊断和/或过度治疗情况相符。

方法与分析

拟进行的范围综述将在一个由五个问题构成的框架内开展,该框架是专门为识别医学中存在过度诊断和过度治疗可能性的领域而制定的。综述将遵循乔安娜·布里格斯范围综述方法。我们将在Medline、Embase、PsycINFO和Cochrane图书馆电子数据库中检索1979年起以英文发表的原始研究。我们还将对纳入文章进行向前和向后的引文检索。符合我们预先定义的排除和纳入标准的研究数据将被录入标准化的提取模板,结果以表格形式映射到我们预先确定的五个问题框架中,并以叙述形式进行总结。

伦理与传播

拟开展的研究是对现有文献的范围综述,因此无需伦理批准。我们打算通过在同行评审期刊上发表以及在会议上进行报告来传播范围综述的结果。此外,我们将利用范围综述的结果为未来研究提供信息,以填补本综述所确定的关键证据空白。