National Institute on Drug Abuse, Division of Epidemiology, Services and Prevention Research, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD, 20892-9589, USA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Prev Sci. 2019 Nov;20(8):1173-1177. doi: 10.1007/s11121-019-01057-7.
As evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to prevent mental, emotional, and behavioral health problems continue to become available, approaches for implementation in systems and settings, at scale, are needed. The article, Scaling-up Evidence-based Interventions in U.S. Public Systems to Prevent Behavioral Health Problems: Challenges and Opportunities (Fagan et al. 2019) examines five large, complex public systems (behavioral health, child welfare, education, juvenile justice, and public health) that have adopted and implemented EBIs in various ways and presents common factors that support scale-up in these systems. This commentary builds on the authors' strategic approach to offer a few additional considerations-issues of sustainability, ways of thinking about knowledge creation, and use of systems science/modeling approaches-to address scale-up in public systems. Moreover, the focus on public systems provides an opportunity to consider how the implementation and sustainment of EBIs might more directly address social determinants of health that are relevant across policy areas and public systems.
随着预防心理、情感和行为健康问题的循证干预措施(EBIs)不断涌现,需要在系统和环境中大规模实施这些措施的方法。本文《在美国公共系统中扩大循证干预措施以预防行为健康问题:挑战与机遇》(Fagan 等人,2019 年)探讨了五个大型、复杂的公共系统(行为健康、儿童福利、教育、少年司法和公共卫生),这些系统以各种方式采用并实施了 EBIs,并提出了支持这些系统扩大规模的共同因素。本评论以作者的战略方法为基础,提出了一些额外的考虑因素——可持续性问题、创造知识的思维方式,以及系统科学/建模方法的使用——以解决公共系统中的扩大规模问题。此外,关注公共系统为如何通过实施和维持 EBIs 更直接地解决与整个政策领域和公共系统相关的健康决定因素提供了机会。