• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为何患者拒绝参与通过提高患者自我管理能力来减少再次住院的干预措施:我们遗漏了哪些人群?

Why patients decline participation in an intervention to reduce re-hospitalization through patient activation: whom are we missing?

作者信息

Flink Maria, Brandberg Carina, Ekstedt Mirjam

机构信息

Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Social work, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Trials. 2019 Jan 25;20(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3187-9.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-019-3187-9
PMID:30683140
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6347805/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite worldwide interest in reducing re-hospitalization, there is limited knowledge regarding characteristics of patients who chose to decline participation in such efforts and why. The aim is to explore reasons to decline participation in an intervention using motivational interviewing to reduce re-hospitalization through patient activation for persons with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or heart failure.

METHODS

This study uses data from 385 patients who were asked about participating in a randomized controlled trial; of these, 232 declined participation. Data on age, gender, and diagnosis were collected for those who agreed to participate and those who declined. Reasons to decline participation were collected for those who were asked to participate but refused. The stated reasons to decline were analyzed using content analysis, and the categories identified were used for the statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The main reasons for declining participation were having sufficient support (17.5%), no need for support (16%), being too ill (14.6%), and lack of time for illness-related activities (14.2%). A statistically significant negative association between age and willingness to participate was found (odds ratio = - 0.03, 95% confidence interval 0.95-0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

Those who agreed to participate were younger than non-participants, and non-participants either lacked time for illness-related activities or did not have the energy needed to become involved in the intervention.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02823795 . Registered on 1 July 2016.

摘要

背景

尽管全球都对减少再次住院感兴趣,但对于那些选择拒绝参与此类工作的患者的特征以及原因,了解有限。目的是探讨慢性阻塞性肺疾病或心力衰竭患者拒绝参与一项使用动机性访谈通过患者激活来减少再次住院的干预措施的原因。

方法

本研究使用了来自385名被询问是否参与一项随机对照试验患者的数据;其中,232人拒绝参与。收集了同意参与和拒绝参与患者的年龄、性别及诊断数据。收集了被邀请参与但拒绝患者拒绝参与的原因。使用内容分析法分析所陈述的拒绝原因,并将确定的类别用于统计分析。

结果

拒绝参与的主要原因是有足够的支持(17.5%)、不需要支持(16%)、病情太重(14.6%)以及没有时间进行与疾病相关的活动(14.2%)。发现年龄与参与意愿之间存在统计学上显著的负相关(优势比=-0.03,95%置信区间0.95-0.99)。

结论

同意参与的患者比未参与者更年轻,未参与者要么没有时间进行与疾病相关的活动,要么没有精力参与干预。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT02823795。于2016年7月1日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24e1/6347805/84e22ed28ab5/13063_2019_3187_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24e1/6347805/84e22ed28ab5/13063_2019_3187_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24e1/6347805/84e22ed28ab5/13063_2019_3187_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Why patients decline participation in an intervention to reduce re-hospitalization through patient activation: whom are we missing?为何患者拒绝参与通过提高患者自我管理能力来减少再次住院的干预措施:我们遗漏了哪些人群?
Trials. 2019 Jan 25;20(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3187-9.
2
The Supporting Patient Activation in Transition to Home (sPATH) intervention: a study protocol of a randomised controlled trial using motivational interviewing to decrease re-hospitalisation for patients with COPD or heart failure.支持患者过渡到家庭的激活(sPATH)干预:一项随机对照试验的研究方案,该试验采用动机性访谈来降低慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)或心力衰竭患者的再次住院率。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 10;7(7):e014178. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014178.
3
The challenges of recruiting cancer patient/caregiver dyads: informing randomized controlled trials.招募癌症患者/照护者二人组的挑战:为随机对照试验提供信息。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 21;18(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0614-7.
4
Effects of a person-centred telephone-support in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and/or chronic heart failure - A randomized controlled trial.以患者为中心的电话支持对慢性阻塞性肺疾病和/或慢性心力衰竭患者的影响 - 一项随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 31;13(8):e0203031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203031. eCollection 2018.
5
A comprehensive hospital-based intervention to reduce readmissions for chronically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial.一项基于综合医院的干预措施以减少慢性病患者再入院率:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Manag Care. 2014 Oct;20(10):783-92.
6
Patient participation during and after a self-management programme in primary healthcare - The experience of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or chronic heart failure.患者在初级医疗保健中的自我管理计划期间和之后的参与情况 - 患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病或慢性心力衰竭患者的经验。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Jun;101(6):1137-1142. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.12.020. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
7
Health Coaching and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Rehospitalization. A Randomized Study.健康指导与慢性阻塞性肺疾病再住院:一项随机研究
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Sep 15;194(6):672-80. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201512-2503OC.
8
A Remote Medication Monitoring System for Chronic Heart Failure Patients to Reduce Readmissions: A Two-Arm Randomized Pilot Study.一种用于慢性心力衰竭患者以减少再入院率的远程药物监测系统:双臂随机试点研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Apr 17;18(5):e91. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5256.
9
Investigating modifications to participant information materials to improve recruitment into a large randomized trial.研究对参与者信息材料进行修改,以提高大型随机试验的招募率。
Trials. 2019 Dec 5;20(1):681. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3779-4.
10
The effectiveness of the teach-back method on adherence and self-management in health education for people with chronic disease: a systematic review.反馈教学法对慢性病患者健康教育中依从性和自我管理的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Jan;14(1):210-47. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2296.

引用本文的文献

1
Supporting people with chronic kidney disease to self-manage their condition: understanding the lived experiences, needs and requirements, and barriers and facilitators.支持慢性肾病患者自我管理其病情:了解他们的生活经历、需求和要求,以及障碍和促进因素。
J Nephrol. 2025 Jul 12. doi: 10.1007/s40620-025-02349-8.
2
Motivational interviewing for reducing rehospitalisation and improving patient activation among patients with heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised controlled trial.动机性访谈对降低心力衰竭或慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者再入院率及提高患者自我管理能力的影响:一项随机对照试验
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 14;15(4):e081931. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081931.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program-learning from failure of a healthcare policy.医院再入院率降低计划——从医疗政策失败中吸取教训。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2018 Aug;20(8):1169-1174. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1212. Epub 2018 May 23.
2
The Supporting Patient Activation in Transition to Home (sPATH) intervention: a study protocol of a randomised controlled trial using motivational interviewing to decrease re-hospitalisation for patients with COPD or heart failure.支持患者过渡到家庭的激活(sPATH)干预:一项随机对照试验的研究方案,该试验采用动机性访谈来降低慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)或心力衰竭患者的再次住院率。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 10;7(7):e014178. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014178.
3
Reasons for declining participation in inpatient research among historically minoritized racial and ethnic communities: A scoping review.
历史上被边缘化的种族和族裔社区住院研究参与率下降的原因:一项范围综述。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 Nov 7;42:101386. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101386. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
The effect of education of self-care behaviors on the quality of life and resilience of multiple sclerosis patients.自我护理行为教育对多发性硬化症患者生活质量和适应能力的影响。
BMC Neurol. 2024 Jul 30;24(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s12883-024-03777-y.
5
Challenges in reaching patients with severe mental illness for trials in general practice-a convergent mixed methods study based on the SOFIA pilot trial.在全科医疗中为患有严重精神疾病的患者开展试验所面临的挑战——一项基于索菲亚试点试验的聚合性混合方法研究
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023 Oct 31;9(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01395-y.
6
Patient Activation: The Cornerstone of Effective Self-Management in Chronic Kidney Disease?患者激活:慢性肾脏病有效自我管理的基石?
Kidney Dial. 2022 Mar;2(1):91-105. doi: 10.3390/kidneydial2010012. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
7
Understanding reasons and factors for participation and non-participation to a medication adherence program for patients with diabetic kidney disease in Switzerland: a mixed methods study.了解瑞士糖尿病肾病患者参与和不参与药物依从性计划的原因及因素:一项混合方法研究。
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2022 Sep 27;14(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s13098-022-00898-7.
8
Acceptance and Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Discharge From Hospital in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Open-label, Prospective, Controlled Study.持续葡萄糖监测对2型糖尿病患者出院的接受度及影响:开放标签、前瞻性、对照研究
JMIR Diabetes. 2022 May 9;7(2):e35163. doi: 10.2196/35163.
9
Self-management challenges following hospital discharge for patients with multimorbidity: a longitudinal qualitative study of a motivational interviewing intervention.多病症患者出院后的自我管理挑战:一项动机性访谈干预的纵向定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 30;11(7):e046896. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046896.
10
Informing Healthcare Decisions with Observational Research Assessing Causal Effect. An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement.运用观察性研究评估因果效应来为医疗保健决策提供信息。美国胸科学会官方研究声明。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Jan 1;203(1):14-23. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202010-3943ST.
Readmissions, Observation, and the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program.
再入院、观察和医院再入院率降低计划。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 21;374(16):1543-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1513024. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
4
Patients' perspectives on the medical primary-secondary care interface: systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research.患者对医疗初级保健与二级保健衔接的看法:定性研究的系统评价与综合分析
BMJ Open. 2015 Oct 15;5(10):e008708. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008708.
5
Preventing 30-day hospital readmissions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.预防30天内再次入院:随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jul;174(7):1095-107. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.1608.
6
Patient activation and 30-day post-discharge hospital utilization.患者激活度与出院后30天的医院利用率。
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Feb;29(2):349-55. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2647-2. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
7
What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs.关于患者激活的证据表明:更好的健康结果和护理体验;关于成本的数据较少。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):207-14. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1061.
8
[The risk of acute readmission can be predicted. Former care consumption patterns and certain diagnoses are strongly predictive].急性再入院风险是可以预测的。既往的护理消费模式和某些诊断具有很强的预测性。
Lakartidningen. 2012;109(48):2211-5.
9
Sweden health system review.瑞典医疗体系综述。
Health Syst Transit. 2012;14(5):1-159.
10
Targeted intervention improves knowledge but not self-care or readmissions in heart failure patients with mild cognitive impairment.有针对性的干预可以提高轻度认知障碍心力衰竭患者的知识水平,但不能改善其自我护理或再入院率。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2012 Sep;14(9):1041-9. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfs096. Epub 2012 Jun 26.