Albers Franziska, Wachsmuth Lydia, Schache Daniel, Lambers Henriette, Faber Cornelius
Translational Research Imaging Center, Department of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Front Neurosci. 2019 Oct 24;13:1104. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.01104. eCollection 2019.
Functional blood-oxygenation-level-dependent (BOLD) MRI provides a brain-wide readout that depends on the hemodynamic response to neuronal activity. Diffusion fMRI has been proposed as an alternative to BOLD fMRI and has been postulated to directly rely on neuronal activity. These complementary functional readouts are versatile tools to be combined with optogenetic stimulation to investigate networks of the brain. The cell-specificity and temporal precision of optogenetic manipulations promise to enable further investigation of the origin of fMRI signals. The signal characteristics of the diffusion fMRI readout vice versa may better resolve network effects of optogenetic stimulation. However, the light application needed for optogenetic stimulation is accompanied by heat deposition within the tissue. As both diffusion and BOLD are sensitive to temperature changes, light application can lead to apparent activations confounding the interpretation of fMRI data. The degree of tissue heating, the appearance of apparent activation in different fMRI sequences and the origin of these phenomena are not well understood. Here, we disentangled apparent activations in BOLD and diffusion measurements in rats from physiological activation upon sensory or optogenetic stimulation. Both, BOLD and diffusion fMRI revealed similar signal shapes upon sensory stimulation that differed clearly from those upon heating. Apparent activations induced by high-intensity light application were dominated by T -effects and resulted in mainly negative signal changes. We estimated that even low-intensity light application used for optogenetic stimulation reduces the BOLD response close to the fiber by up to 0.4%. The diffusion fMRI signal contained T, T and diffusion components. The apparent diffusion coefficient, which reflects the isolated diffusion component, showed negative changes upon both optogenetic and electric forepaw stimulation. In contrast, positive changes were detected upon high-intensity light application and thus ruled out heating as a major contributor to the diffusion fMRI signal.
功能性血氧水平依赖(BOLD)磁共振成像(MRI)提供了一种全脑范围的测量结果,该结果依赖于对神经元活动的血流动力学反应。扩散功能磁共振成像已被提议作为BOLD功能磁共振成像的替代方法,并被假定直接依赖于神经元活动。这些互补的功能测量结果是与光遗传学刺激相结合以研究脑网络的通用工具。光遗传学操作的细胞特异性和时间精度有望进一步研究功能磁共振成像信号的起源。反之,扩散功能磁共振成像测量结果的信号特征可能更好地解析光遗传学刺激的网络效应。然而,光遗传学刺激所需的光照射会伴随着组织内的热量沉积。由于扩散和BOLD对温度变化都很敏感,光照射会导致明显的激活,从而混淆功能磁共振成像数据的解释。组织加热的程度、不同功能磁共振成像序列中明显激活的出现情况以及这些现象的起源尚不清楚。在这里,我们将大鼠BOLD和扩散测量中的明显激活与感觉或光遗传学刺激后的生理激活区分开来。在感觉刺激下,BOLD和扩散功能磁共振成像都显示出相似的信号形状,这与加热时的信号形状明显不同。高强度光照射引起的明显激活主要由T效应主导,并导致主要为负的信号变化。我们估计,即使是用于光遗传学刺激的低强度光照射也会使靠近纤维处的BOLD反应降低多达0.4%。扩散功能磁共振成像信号包含T、T和扩散成分。反映孤立扩散成分的表观扩散系数在光遗传学刺激和前爪电刺激时均显示出负变化。相比之下,在高强度光照射时检测到正变化,因此排除了加热是扩散功能磁共振成像信号的主要贡献因素。