Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Institute of Health and Wellbeing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Ann Fam Med. 2019 Nov;17(6):518-525. doi: 10.1370/afm.2429.
To assess the effect of a primary care-based community-links practitioner (CLP) intervention on patients' quality of life and well-being.
Quasi-experimental cluster-randomized controlled trial in socioeconomically deprived areas of Glasgow, Scotland. Adult patients (aged 18 years or older) referred to CLPs in 7 intervention practices were compared with a random sample of adult patients from 8 comparison practices at baseline and 9 months.
health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L, a standardized measure of self-reported health-related quality of life that assesses 5 dimensions at 5 levels of severity).
well-being (Investigating Choice Experiments for the Preferences of Older People Capability Measure for Adults [ICECAP-A]), depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Depression [HADS-D]), anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Anxiety [HADS-A]), and self-reported exercise. Multilevel, multiregression analyses adjusted for baseline differences. Patients were not blinded to the intervention, but outcome analysis was masked.
Data were collected on 288 and 214 (74.3%) patients in the intervention practices at baseline and follow-up, respectively, and on 612 and 561 (92%) patients in the comparison practices. Intention-to-treat analysis found no differences between the 2 groups for any outcome. In subgroup analyses, patients who saw the CLP on 3 or more occasions (45% of those referred) had significant improvements in EQ-5D-5L, HADS-D, HADS-A, and exercise levels. There was a high positive correlation between CLP consultation rates and patient uptake of suggested community resources.
We were unable to prove the effectiveness of referral to CLPs based in primary care in deprived areas for improving patient outcomes. Future efforts to boost uptake and engagement could improve overall outcomes, although the apparent improvements in those who regularly saw the CLPs may be due to reverse causality. Further research is needed before wide-scale deployment of this approach.
评估初级保健为基础的社区联系从业者(CLP)干预对患者生活质量和幸福感的影响。
在苏格兰格拉斯哥社会经济贫困地区进行的准实验性群组随机对照试验。在 7 个干预实践中向 CLP 转诊的成年患者(年龄在 18 岁或以上)与 8 个对照实践中的成年患者随机样本在基线和 9 个月时进行比较。
健康相关生活质量(EQ-5D-5L,一种标准化的自我报告健康相关生活质量衡量标准,评估 5 个维度的 5 个严重程度水平)。
幸福感(调查老年人偏好的选择实验成人能力量表[ICECAP-A])、抑郁(医院焦虑和抑郁量表,抑郁[HADS-D])、焦虑(医院焦虑和抑郁量表,焦虑[HADS-A])和自我报告的运动。多水平、多回归分析调整了基线差异。患者对干预措施没有不知情,但结果分析是盲法的。
在干预实践中,分别有 288 名和 214 名(74.3%)患者在基线和随访时收集了数据,在对照实践中分别有 612 名和 561 名(92%)患者收集了数据。意向治疗分析发现两组在任何结果上均无差异。在亚组分析中,那些与 CLP 有 3 次或更多次接触的患者(被转诊患者的 45%)在 EQ-5D-5L、HADS-D、HADS-A 和运动水平方面有显著改善。CLP 咨询率与患者对建议社区资源的利用率之间存在高度正相关。
我们无法证明在贫困地区初级保健为基础的 CLP 转诊对改善患者结果的有效性。未来增加接受度和参与度的努力可能会改善整体结果,尽管那些经常见到 CLP 的患者的明显改善可能归因于反向因果关系。在广泛部署这种方法之前,需要进行进一步的研究。