Suppr超能文献

急诊科狼疮患者合并侵袭性感染的死亡风险预测:LUPHAS评分

Mortality risk prediction in lupus patients complicated with invasive infection in the emergency department: LUPHAS score.

作者信息

Wu Wanlong, Ma Jun, Zhou Yuhong, Tang Chao, Zhao Feng, Sun Fangfang, Xu Wenwen, Chen Jie, Ye Shuang, Chen Yi

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, South Campus, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

Department of Emergency Medicine, South Campus, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2019 Nov 5;11:1759720X19885559. doi: 10.1177/1759720X19885559. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Infection remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). This study aimed to establish a clinical prediction model for the 3-month all-cause mortality of invasive infection events in patients with SLE in the emergency department.

METHODS

SLE patients complicated with invasive infection admitted into the emergency department were included in this study. Patient's demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics on admission were retrospectively collected as baseline data and compared between the deceased and the survivors. Independent predictors were identified by multivariable logistic regression analysis. A prediction model for all-cause mortality was established and evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 130 eligible patients were collected with a cumulative 38.5% 3-month mortality. Lymphocyte count <800/ul, urea >7.6mmol/l, maximum prednisone dose in the past ⩾60 mg/d, quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qOFA) score, and age at baseline were independent predictors for all-cause mortality (LUPHAS). In contrast, a history of hydroxychloroquine use was protective. In a combined, odds ratio-weighted LUPHAS scoring system (score 3-22), patients were categorized to three groups: low-risk (score 3-9), medium-risk (score 10-15), and high-risk (score 16-22), with mortalities of 4.9% (2/41), 45.9% (28/61), and 78.3% (18/23) respectively. ROC curve analysis indicated that a LUPHAS score could effectively predict all-cause mortality [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.86, CI 95% 0.79-0.92]. In addition, LUPHAS score performed better than the qSOFA score alone (AUC = 0.69, CI 95% 0.59-0.78), or CURB-65 score (AUC = 0.69, CI 95% 0.59-0.80) in the subgroup of lung infections ( = 108).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a large emergency cohort of lupus patients complicated with invasive infection, the LUPHAS score was established to predict the short-term all-cause mortality, which could be a promising applicable tool for risk stratification in clinical practice.

摘要

背景

感染仍然是系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者发病和死亡的主要原因。本研究旨在建立一种临床预测模型,用于预测急诊科SLE患者侵袭性感染事件3个月全因死亡率。

方法

本研究纳入了急诊科收治的合并侵袭性感染的SLE患者。回顾性收集患者入院时的人口统计学、临床和实验室特征作为基线数据,并在死亡患者和存活患者之间进行比较。通过多变量逻辑回归分析确定独立预测因素。建立全因死亡率预测模型,并通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析进行评估。

结果

共收集了130例符合条件的患者,3个月累计死亡率为38.5%。淋巴细胞计数<800/ul、尿素>7.6mmol/l、过去最大泼尼松剂量⩾60mg/d、快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qOFA)评分和基线年龄是全因死亡率的独立预测因素(LUPHAS)。相比之下,使用羟氯喹的病史具有保护作用。在一个综合的、比值比加权的LUPHAS评分系统(评分3-22)中,患者被分为三组:低风险(评分3-9)、中风险(评分10-15)和高风险(评分16-22),死亡率分别为4.9%(2/41)、45.9%(28/61)和78.3%(18/23)。ROC曲线分析表明,LUPHAS评分可以有效预测全因死亡率[曲线下面积(AUC)=0.86,95%CI 0.79-0.92]。此外,在肺部感染亚组(n=108)中,LUPHAS评分的表现优于单独的qSOFA评分(AUC=0.69,95%CI 0.59-0.78)或CURB-65评分(AUC=0.69,95%CI 0.59-0.80)。

结论

基于大量合并侵袭性感染的狼疮患者的急诊队列,建立了LUPHAS评分以预测短期全因死亡率,这可能是临床实践中一种有前景的风险分层适用工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验