Kelman M, Barrs V R, Norris J M, Ward M P
The University of Sydney, Sydney School of Veterinary Science, NSW 2006, Australia.
The University of Sydney, Sydney School of Veterinary Science, NSW 2006, Australia.
Prev Vet Med. 2020 Jan;174:104817. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104817. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
Canine Parvovirus (CPV) causes severe morbidity and mortality in dogs, particularly puppies, worldwide. Although vaccination is highly efficacious in preventing disease, cases continue to occur and vaccination failures are well documented. Maternally derived antibody interference is the leading cause of vaccination failure and age at vaccine administration is a significant risk factor for failure. However, no studies have been performed on practicing veterinarians' usage of and compliance with published vaccination guidelines and label recommendations. Likewise, there are no published studies of veterinarian perceptions on CPV occurrence and mortality and its influence on case outcome. We report a study in which all Australian small companion animal (canine and feline) veterinary hospitals were surveyed, yielding a response rate of 23.5% (534 unique veterinary hospitals). Respondents overall perceived national CPV occurrence ten-times lower (median 2000 cases) than the estimated national caseload (20,000 cases). Respondents from hospitals that did not diagnose CPV perceived national occurrence twenty-times lower (median 1000 cases) than the estimated rate (p < 0.0001). Perceived disease mortality (50%) was 2.74 times higher than that reported (18.2%). In addition, 26.7% of veterinarians reported using serological titer testing to some degree, which some practitioners use in lieu of vaccination if a titer is perceived to reflect sufficient immunity. Based on this study veterinarians appear to be aware of the disease risk in their region but unaware of the burden of CPV disease nationally, and perceive mortality risk higher than it actually is. This might lead to an overestimation of cost to treat, and over-recommendation of euthanasia. Nearly half (48.7%) of respondents recommended final puppy vaccination earlier than guidelines recommend, while 2.8% of respondents recommended a puppy re-vaccination interval longer than supported by vaccine labels and guidelines. Both of these practices may put puppies at risk of CPV infection.
犬细小病毒(CPV)在全球范围内会导致犬类,尤其是幼犬出现严重发病和死亡情况。尽管疫苗接种在预防疾病方面非常有效,但病例仍不断出现,且疫苗接种失败的情况也有充分记录。母源抗体干扰是疫苗接种失败的主要原因,疫苗接种时的年龄是失败的一个重要风险因素。然而,尚未有针对执业兽医对已发布的疫苗接种指南和标签建议的使用情况及遵循程度的研究。同样,也没有关于兽医对CPV发生情况、死亡率及其对病例结果影响的认知的已发表研究。我们报告了一项研究,该研究对澳大利亚所有小型伴侣动物(犬类和猫类)兽医医院进行了调查,回复率为23.5%(534家独立兽医医院)。总体而言,受访者认为全国CPV的发生病例数比估计的全国病例负荷(20000例)低十倍(中位数为2000例)。未诊断出CPV的医院的受访者认为全国病例数比估计发生率低二十倍(中位数为1000例)(p < 0.0001)。感知到的疾病死亡率(50%)比报告的死亡率(18.2%)高2.74倍。此外,26.7%的兽医报告在一定程度上使用血清学滴度检测,一些从业者如果认为滴度反映了足够的免疫力,就会用其代替疫苗接种。基于这项研究,兽医似乎意识到了所在地区的疾病风险,但未意识到全国范围内CPV疾病的负担,并且感知到的死亡风险高于实际情况。这可能导致对治疗成本的高估以及对安乐死的过度推荐。近一半(48.7%)的受访者建议在幼犬最终疫苗接种时间上早于指南推荐时间,而2.8%的受访者建议的幼犬再次接种间隔时间比疫苗标签和指南所支持的时间长。这两种做法都可能使幼犬面临CPV感染的风险。