Suppr超能文献

普通人群中自我报告的精神病性体验、临床相关精神病性体验和精神病性症状衰减之间的差异。

Differences Between Self-Reported Psychotic Experiences, Clinically Relevant Psychotic Experiences, and Attenuated Psychotic Symptoms in the General Population.

作者信息

Moriyama Tais Silveira, van Os Jim, Gadelha Ary, Pan Pedro Mario, Salum Giovanni Abrahão, Manfro Gisele Gus, Mari Jair de Jesus, Miguel Eurípedes Constantino, Rohde Luis Augusto, Polanczyk Guilherme Vanoni, McGuire Philip, Bressan Rodrigo Affonseca, Drukker Marjan

机构信息

Centro de Atendimento Especializado, Instituto Bairral de Psiquiatria, Itapira, Brazil.

Department of Psychiatry, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2019 Oct 29;10:782. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00782. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Psychotic experiences in childhood (such as hearing voices or being suspicious) represent an important phenotype for early intervention. However, these experiences can be defined in several ways: self-reported psychotic experiences (SRPE) rely exclusively on the child's report, clinically validated psychotic experiences (CRPE) are based on clinical assessment, and attenuated psychotic symptoms (APS) represents a categorization to do with clinical relevance in relation to severity. Very few studies have investigated how these distinctions impact clinical and other domains. The present study aims to compare SRPE, CRPE, and APS among children and adolescents. This study is part of the Brazilian High-Risk Cohort Study for Psychiatric Disorders, in which 2,241 individuals aged 6-14 years provided self-ratings of 20 psychotic experiences using the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE). A trained psychologist conducted an interview to validate or reject reported experiences and to rate the presence of APS and affective flattening. In parallel, parents provided information about child mental health to an independent interviewer. We tested the association of mutually exclusive categories of non-validated SRPE (nSRPE), clinically validated PE below the threshold for APS (nCRPE), and APS (nSRPE = 33%, nCRPE = 11%, APS = 6%), with parents' information about the child's positive attributes and levels of psychopathology and psychologist assessment of blunted affect. Most associations were qualitatively similar, and there was a dose-response in the strength of associations across categories, such that APS > nCRPE > nSRPE. Experiences in all three categories were associated with female sex. nSRPE were associated with overall levels of psychopathology, but to a lesser degree than nCRPE and APS. APS and nCRPE were associated with less positive attributes, with APS more so than nCRPE. Only APS was associated with affective flattening. In children and adolescents, SRPE, CRPE, and APS all index liability for psychopathology, but as clinician rated relevance increases, associations get stronger and become evident across more domains.

摘要

儿童期的精神病性体验(如幻听或多疑)是早期干预的重要表型。然而,这些体验可以通过多种方式来定义:自我报告的精神病性体验(SRPE)完全依赖于儿童的报告,临床验证的精神病性体验(CRPE)基于临床评估,而精神病性症状减弱(APS)则是一种与严重程度相关的临床相关性分类。很少有研究调查这些差异如何影响临床及其他领域。本研究旨在比较儿童和青少年中的SRPE、CRPE和APS。 本研究是巴西精神疾病高危队列研究的一部分,在该研究中,2241名6至14岁的个体使用精神体验社区评估(CAPE)对20种精神病性体验进行了自我评定。一名经过培训的心理学家进行访谈,以验证或否定所报告的体验,并对APS和情感平淡的存在进行评定。同时,父母向一名独立访谈者提供有关儿童心理健康的信息。我们测试了未经验证的SRPE(nSRPE)、低于APS阈值的临床验证的PE(nCRPE)和APS(nSRPE = 33%,nCRPE = 11%,APS = 6%)的相互排斥类别与父母关于儿童积极属性和精神病理学水平的信息以及心理学家对情感迟钝的评估之间的关联。大多数关联在性质上相似,并且跨类别关联强度存在剂量反应,即APS > nCRPE > nSRPE。所有三个类别的体验都与女性性别相关。nSRPE与精神病理学的总体水平相关,但程度低于nCRPE和APS。APS和nCRPE与较少的积极属性相关,APS比nCRPE更甚。只有APS与情感平淡相关。在儿童和青少年中,SRPE、CRPE和APS均指示精神病理学易感性,但随着临床评定的相关性增加,关联变得更强且在更多领域变得明显。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a32e/6829673/f137fe94b617/fpsyt-10-00782-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验