Department of Psychiatry, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center (AE Spencer, TD Baul, J Sikov, and O Buonocore), Boston, Mass.
Department of Psychiatry, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center (AE Spencer, TD Baul, J Sikov, and O Buonocore), Boston, Mass.
Acad Pediatr. 2020 Mar;20(2):208-215. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2019.11.006. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
The study's goal was to measure the association between social risks and the mental health of school-age children in primary care.
We conducted a cross-sectional study in an urban safety-net hospital-based pediatric clinic using data collected from 2 standardized screening tools administered at well-child care visits for children age 6 to 11. Psychosocial dysfunction was measured with the Pediatric Symptom Checklist-17 (PSC-17), and 6 social risks (caregiver education, employment, child care, housing, food security, and household heat) were measured with the WE CARE screener. Multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses were conducted to measure the association between scores while controlling for sociodemographic characteristics.
Among N = 943 patients, cumulative social risks were significantly associated with a positive PSC-17 total score (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-1.5; P = .02), indicating psychosocial dysfunction. Children with ≥3 social risks were 2.4 times more likely to have a positive PSC-17 total score compared to children with <3 social risks (95% CI 1.5-3.9; P < .001). Of the individual social risks measured, only food insecurity significantly predicted a positive PSC-17 total score (aOR 1.9; 95% CI 1.1-3.2; P = .02) and attention score (aOR 1.9; 95% CI 1.1-3.4; P = .03).
Number of risks on a social risk screener was associated with psychosocial dysfunction in school-age children. Food insecurity was the only individual risk associated with psychosocial dysfunction, in particular attention problems. Screening tools for social risks could be used to identify at-risk children whose mental health may be adversely impacted by their social conditions.
本研究旨在测量社会风险与初级保健中小学生心理健康之间的关联。
我们在一家城市安全网医院儿科诊所进行了一项横断面研究,使用在儿童 6 至 11 岁进行常规儿童保健就诊时使用的 2 种标准化筛查工具收集的数据。使用儿童症状清单-17(PSC-17)测量心理社会功能障碍,使用 WE CARE 筛查器测量 6 种社会风险(照料者教育、就业、儿童保育、住房、食品安全和家庭供暖)。进行多变量线性和逻辑回归分析,以在控制社会人口统计学特征的情况下测量得分之间的关联。
在 N=943 名患者中,累积社会风险与阳性 PSC-17 总分显著相关(调整后的优势比 [aOR] 1.2;95%置信区间 [CI] 1.1-1.5;P=0.02),表明存在心理社会功能障碍。与<3 种社会风险的儿童相比,具有≥3 种社会风险的儿童出现阳性 PSC-17 总分的可能性高 2.4 倍(95%CI 1.5-3.9;P<0.001)。在所测量的个体社会风险中,只有食品安全问题显著预测了阳性 PSC-17 总分(aOR 1.9;95%CI 1.1-3.2;P=0.02)和注意力评分(aOR 1.9;95%CI 1.1-3.4;P=0.03)。
社会风险筛查器上的风险数量与学龄儿童的心理社会功能障碍有关。食品安全问题是唯一与心理社会功能障碍相关的个体风险,特别是注意力问题。社会风险筛查工具可用于识别心理健康可能受到社会条件不利影响的高危儿童。