UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, UK.
Oxford Martin School and Wellcome Unit for the History of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Feb;20(2):e54-e62. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30552-3. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
In this Personal View, we critically examine the wider context of international efforts to stimulate commercial antibiotic research and development via public-private initiatives. Despite these efforts, antibiotics remain a global resource without an international support structure that is commensurate to the risks from antibiotic-resistant infections and the long-term nature of required solutions. To protect this resource, we propose a two-pronged antibiotic research and development strategy based on a short-term strengthening of incentives (such as market entry rewards) to maximise the delivery of existing opportunities in the pipeline, and on a concurrent medium-term to long-term establishment of a global, publicly funded antibiotic research and development institute. Designed sustainably to deliver novel and first-in-class antibiotics targeting key human health gaps, the institute and its staff would become a global resource that, unlike the private pharmaceutical sector, would be managed as an open science platform. Our model of internationalised public research and development would maximise scientific synergy and cross-fertilisation, minimise replication of effort, acquire and preserve existing know-how, and ensure equitable and sustainable access to novel and effective antibiotics. Its genuinely global focus would also help counteract tendencies to equate donor with global health priorities. Our proposal is not radical. Historical precedent and developments in other research areas show that sustained international funding of publicly owned research can hasten the delivery of critically needed drugs and lower barriers to access.
在这篇观点文章中,我们批判性地审视了通过公私合作倡议来刺激商业抗生素研究和开发的国际努力的更广泛背景。尽管有这些努力,但抗生素仍然是一种全球资源,没有与之相称的国际支持结构来应对抗生素耐药性感染的风险和所需解决方案的长期性。为了保护这一资源,我们提出了一种双管齐下的抗生素研发策略,基于短期激励措施的加强(如市场准入奖励),以最大限度地发挥管道中现有机会的效益,同时在中期到长期建立一个全球、公共资助的抗生素研发机构。该机构及其工作人员将被设计为可持续地提供针对关键人类健康空白的新型和首创抗生素,成为一种全球资源,与私营制药部门不同,它将作为一个开放科学平台进行管理。我们的国际化公共研发模式将最大限度地发挥科学协同作用和交叉授粉作用,最大限度地减少工作重复,获取和保存现有专门技术,并确保获得新型和有效的抗生素的公平和可持续性。其真正的全球重点也将有助于抵制将捐助与全球卫生重点等同起来的倾向。我们的提议并不激进。历史先例和其他研究领域的发展表明,持续的国际公共研究资金可以加速急需药物的交付,并降低准入壁垒。