McMahon Meghan, Bornstein Stephen, Brown Adalsteinn, Tamblyn Robyn
Associate Director, CIHR Institute of Health Services and Policy Research, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
Professor, Division of Community Health and Humanities, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Arts, Memorial University; Director, Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Applied Health Research; Co-Director, SafetyNet Centre for Occupational Health and Safety Research, St. John's, NL.
Healthc Policy. 2019 Oct;15(SP):10-15. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2019.25983.
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) has articulated a vision of a learning health system (LHS) as one that provides the best care at lower costs and that constantly, systematically and seamlessly improves based on data and evidence (IOM 2013). The IOM identifies the four foundational characteristics of an LHS as the real-time use of data and informatics to capture the care experience, patient-clinician partnerships, incentives aligned for value and a leadership-instilled culture of learning (IOM 2013). Although much policy research and commentary has focused on informatics and incentives, relatively less has focused on the critical question of creating a culture of learning in these systems. And although its source is debated, most management gurus agree with the adage that "culture eats strategy for breakfast" (Cave 2017), which is why a focus on the cultural dimension is critically important. Some scholars have recognized the important role of human capital - and of front-line clinicians in particular - in the LHS (Verma and Bhatia 2016). In addition to clinicians, doctorally prepared individuals, such as those with a PhD in health services and policy research (HSPR) and fields such as health economics, epidemiology and health informatics, have the potential to make significant contributions to LHSs and health system reform (Bornstein 2016; Brown and Nuti 2016; CIHR-IHSPR 2016). But having a PhD in these fields is not the same as being prepared to support progress toward an LHS. As argued in other papers, substantial change in doctoral training is needed so that graduates can contribute to their full potential and help drive real innovation within the health system (Bornstein 2016; CIHR-IHSPR 2016; Reid 2016).
美国医学研究所(IOM)提出了学习型健康系统(LHS)的愿景,即一个能够以较低成本提供最佳医疗服务,并基于数据和证据持续、系统且无缝地改进的系统(IOM,2013年)。IOM将学习型健康系统的四个基本特征确定为实时使用数据和信息学以获取医疗经验、患者与临床医生的伙伴关系、与价值相一致的激励措施以及由领导力灌输的学习文化(IOM,2013年)。尽管许多政策研究和评论都集中在信息学和激励措施上,但相对较少关注在这些系统中创建学习文化这一关键问题。而且,尽管其来源存在争议,但大多数管理大师都认同“文化早餐吃掉战略”这一格言(凯夫,2017年),这就是为什么关注文化维度至关重要的原因。一些学者已经认识到人力资本——尤其是一线临床医生——在学习型健康系统中的重要作用(韦尔马和巴蒂亚,2016年)。除了临床医生之外,拥有博士学位的人员,如那些拥有卫生服务与政策研究(HSPR)博士学位以及卫生经济学、流行病学和卫生信息学等领域的人员,有潜力为学习型健康系统和卫生系统改革做出重大贡献(博恩斯坦,2016年;布朗和努蒂,2016年;加拿大卫生研究院 - 卫生服务与政策研究学会,2016年)。但是,在这些领域拥有博士学位并不等同于做好了支持向学习型健康系统迈进的准备。正如其他论文所指出的,博士培训需要进行重大变革,以便毕业生能够充分发挥其潜力,并帮助推动卫生系统内的真正创新(博恩斯坦,2016年;加拿大卫生研究院 - 卫生服务与政策研究学会,2016年;里德,2016年)。