Institut des Agents infectieux, Centre de Biologie et Pathologies Nord, Hôpital de la Croix Rousse, Lyon, France.
UMR CNRS 5557, Ecologie Microbienne - Groupe de Recherche "Pathogènes Opportunistes et Environnement" - ISPB-Faculté de Pharmacie, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020 Mar;39(3):559-567. doi: 10.1007/s10096-019-03758-x. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
We assessed the performance of the VITEK® MS IVD V3.0 matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization - time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-ToF MS) V3.0 database for the identification of Nocardia spp. as compared with targeted DNA sequencing. A collection of 222 DNA sequence-defined Nocardia spp. strains encompassing 18 different species present or not in the database was tested. Bromocresol purple agar (BCP) and Columbia agar +5% sheep's blood (COS) culture media were used together with two different preparation steps: direct smear and a "3 attempts" procedure that covered (1) spotting of an extract, (2) new spotting of the same extract, and (3) spotting of a new extract. The direct smear protocol yielded low correct identification rates (≤ 15% for both media) whereas protein extraction yielded correct identification results (> 67% regardless of the media used.). The use of 2 additional attempts using repeat or new extracts increased correct identification rates to 87% and 91% for BCP and COS, respectively. When using the 3 attempts procedure, the best identification results, independent of media types, were obtained for N. farcinica and N. cyriacigeorgica (100%). Identification attempts 2 and 3 allowed to increase the number of correct identifications (BCP, +20%; COS, +13%). The enhancement in performance during attempts 2 and 3 was remarkable for N. abscessus (81% for both media) and low prevalence species (BCP, 70%; COS, 85%). Up to 3.4% and 2.4% of the strains belonging to species present in the database were misidentified with BCP and COS media, respectively. In 1.9% of the cases for BCP and 1.4% for COS, these misidentifications concerned a species belonging to the same phylogenetic complex. Concerning strains that are not claimed in the V3.0 database, N. puris and N. goodfellowi generated "No identification" results and 100% of the strains belonging to N. arthritidis, N.cerradoensis, and N. altamirensis yielded a misidentification within the same phylogenetic complex. Vitek® MS IVD V3.0 is an accurate and useful tool for identification of Nocardia spp.
我们评估了 VITEK® MS IVD V3.0 基质辅助激光解吸电离-飞行时间质谱(MALDI-ToF MS)V3.0 数据库用于鉴定诺卡氏菌属的性能,与靶向 DNA 测序进行比较。我们测试了一个由 222 株 DNA 序列定义的诺卡氏菌属菌株组成的集合,这些菌株涵盖了数据库中存在或不存在的 18 个不同种。使用溴甲酚紫琼脂(BCP)和哥伦比亚琼脂+5%绵羊血(COS)培养基,并采用两种不同的准备步骤:直接涂片和“3 次尝试”程序,该程序包括(1)提取物的斑点,(2)同一提取物的新斑点,以及(3)新提取物的斑点。直接涂片方案的正确鉴定率较低(两种培养基均≤15%),而蛋白质提取则获得了正确的鉴定结果(>67%,无论使用哪种培养基)。使用 2 次额外的尝试,使用重复或新的提取液,可将 BCP 和 COS 的正确鉴定率分别提高至 87%和 91%。使用 3 次尝试程序时,对于 N. farcinica 和 N. cyriacigeorgica,无论培养基类型如何,都可以获得最佳的鉴定结果(100%)。尝试 2 和 3 可以增加正确鉴定的数量(BCP,+20%;COS,+13%)。对于 N. abscessus(两种培养基均为 81%)和低流行种,尝试 2 和 3 可显著提高鉴定性能(BCP,70%;COS,85%)。在 BCP 和 COS 培养基中,分别有 3.4%和 2.4%属于数据库中存在的种的菌株被错误鉴定。在 BCP 中有 1.9%的情况下和 COS 中有 1.4%的情况下,这些错误鉴定涉及同一进化枝的种。对于不属于 V3.0 数据库的菌株,N. puris 和 N. goodfellowi 产生“未鉴定”结果,而 N. arthritidis、N.cerradoensis 和 N. altamirensis 属的所有菌株都在同一进化枝内产生错误鉴定。Vitek® MS IVD V3.0 是一种准确且有用的鉴定诺卡氏菌属的工具。