Suppr超能文献

采用两种培养基和比较直接涂片和蛋白提取程序评估 VITEK® MS IVD 数据库 V3.0 对诺卡氏菌属的鉴定。

Assessment of VITEK® MS IVD database V3.0 for identification of Nocardia spp. using two culture media and comparing direct smear and protein extraction procedures.

机构信息

Institut des Agents infectieux, Centre de Biologie et Pathologies Nord, Hôpital de la Croix Rousse, Lyon, France.

UMR CNRS 5557, Ecologie Microbienne - Groupe de Recherche "Pathogènes Opportunistes et Environnement" - ISPB-Faculté de Pharmacie, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020 Mar;39(3):559-567. doi: 10.1007/s10096-019-03758-x. Epub 2019 Nov 22.

Abstract

We assessed the performance of the VITEK® MS IVD V3.0 matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization - time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-ToF MS) V3.0 database for the identification of Nocardia spp. as compared with targeted DNA sequencing. A collection of 222 DNA sequence-defined Nocardia spp. strains encompassing 18 different species present or not in the database was tested. Bromocresol purple agar (BCP) and Columbia agar +5% sheep's blood (COS) culture media were used together with two different preparation steps: direct smear and a "3 attempts" procedure that covered (1) spotting of an extract, (2) new spotting of the same extract, and (3) spotting of a new extract. The direct smear protocol yielded low correct identification rates (≤ 15% for both media) whereas protein extraction yielded correct identification results (> 67% regardless of the media used.). The use of 2 additional attempts using repeat or new extracts increased correct identification rates to 87% and 91% for BCP and COS, respectively. When using the 3 attempts procedure, the best identification results, independent of media types, were obtained for N. farcinica and N. cyriacigeorgica (100%). Identification attempts 2 and 3 allowed to increase the number of correct identifications (BCP, +20%; COS, +13%). The enhancement in performance during attempts 2 and 3 was remarkable for N. abscessus (81% for both media) and low prevalence species (BCP, 70%; COS, 85%). Up to 3.4% and 2.4% of the strains belonging to species present in the database were misidentified with BCP and COS media, respectively. In 1.9% of the cases for BCP and 1.4% for COS, these misidentifications concerned a species belonging to the same phylogenetic complex. Concerning strains that are not claimed in the V3.0 database, N. puris and N. goodfellowi generated "No identification" results and 100% of the strains belonging to N. arthritidis, N.cerradoensis, and N. altamirensis yielded a misidentification within the same phylogenetic complex. Vitek® MS IVD V3.0 is an accurate and useful tool for identification of Nocardia spp.

摘要

我们评估了 VITEK® MS IVD V3.0 基质辅助激光解吸电离-飞行时间质谱(MALDI-ToF MS)V3.0 数据库用于鉴定诺卡氏菌属的性能,与靶向 DNA 测序进行比较。我们测试了一个由 222 株 DNA 序列定义的诺卡氏菌属菌株组成的集合,这些菌株涵盖了数据库中存在或不存在的 18 个不同种。使用溴甲酚紫琼脂(BCP)和哥伦比亚琼脂+5%绵羊血(COS)培养基,并采用两种不同的准备步骤:直接涂片和“3 次尝试”程序,该程序包括(1)提取物的斑点,(2)同一提取物的新斑点,以及(3)新提取物的斑点。直接涂片方案的正确鉴定率较低(两种培养基均≤15%),而蛋白质提取则获得了正确的鉴定结果(>67%,无论使用哪种培养基)。使用 2 次额外的尝试,使用重复或新的提取液,可将 BCP 和 COS 的正确鉴定率分别提高至 87%和 91%。使用 3 次尝试程序时,对于 N. farcinica 和 N. cyriacigeorgica,无论培养基类型如何,都可以获得最佳的鉴定结果(100%)。尝试 2 和 3 可以增加正确鉴定的数量(BCP,+20%;COS,+13%)。对于 N. abscessus(两种培养基均为 81%)和低流行种,尝试 2 和 3 可显著提高鉴定性能(BCP,70%;COS,85%)。在 BCP 和 COS 培养基中,分别有 3.4%和 2.4%属于数据库中存在的种的菌株被错误鉴定。在 BCP 中有 1.9%的情况下和 COS 中有 1.4%的情况下,这些错误鉴定涉及同一进化枝的种。对于不属于 V3.0 数据库的菌株,N. puris 和 N. goodfellowi 产生“未鉴定”结果,而 N. arthritidis、N.cerradoensis 和 N. altamirensis 属的所有菌株都在同一进化枝内产生错误鉴定。Vitek® MS IVD V3.0 是一种准确且有用的鉴定诺卡氏菌属的工具。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验