• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症免疫治疗资源的在线搜索行为与可读性分析:助力医疗决策的契机

Online Search Behavior for Cancer Immunotherapy Resources and Readability Analysis: An Opportunity to Aid in Medical Decision-making.

作者信息

Deng Jie, Savjani Ricky R, Lee Percy

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2019 Oct 7;11(10):e5857. doi: 10.7759/cureus.5857.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.5857
PMID:31763080
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6834090/
Abstract

Cancer patients are faced with increasing options for cancer care, especially with the introduction of cancer immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Though many patients turn to online resources to supplement their decision-making, it is unknown whether online resources in cancer immunotherapy with ICIs are written at an appropriate level of readability according to national medical organizations. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of internet search behavior for cancer immunotherapy by ICIs and clinical trial availability per ClinicalTrials.gov in the United States (US) from 2004 - 2018 with subsequent quantitation of readability by four readability formulas of top 50 online resources. Internet search behavior for "cancer immunotherapy" has steadily increased since 2013 and coincides with the year of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for individual ICIs. Furthermore, internet search behavior was significantly correlated with clinical trial availability in the US (R = 0.97, p < 0.0001). None of the top 50 resources available to patients were found to be within the recommended level of sixth-grade readability or less with only one (2%) written at the middle school level, 21 (42%) at the high school level, 23 (46%) at the university level, and five (8%) at a graduate level. Population-level internet search patterns may reflect patient behavior in seeking relevant online health information and may be influenced by new options for cancer therapy, including via clinical trials. However, low readability of available online resources may impede patient comprehension and negatively affect medical decision-making.

摘要

癌症患者在癌症治疗方面面临着越来越多的选择,尤其是随着免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)癌症免疫疗法的引入。尽管许多患者会借助网络资源来辅助他们做决策,但根据国家医学组织的标准,尚不清楚关于ICIs癌症免疫疗法的网络资源是否具有适宜的可读性水平。我们对2004年至2018年美国通过ICIs进行癌症免疫疗法的互联网搜索行为以及ClinicalTrials.gov上的临床试验可用性进行了横断面分析,随后使用前50个网络资源的四种可读性公式对可读性进行了量化。自2013年以来,“癌症免疫疗法”的互联网搜索行为稳步增加,这与美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准个别ICIs的年份相吻合。此外,美国的互联网搜索行为与临床试验可用性显著相关(R = 0.97,p < 0.0001)。在提供给患者的前50个资源中,没有一个的可读性水平达到或低于推荐的六年级水平,只有一个(2%)为初中水平,21个(42%)为高中水平,23个(46%)为大学水平,5个(8%)为研究生水平。人群层面的互联网搜索模式可能反映了患者寻求相关在线健康信息的行为,并且可能受到癌症治疗新选择的影响,包括通过临床试验。然而,现有网络资源的低可读性可能会妨碍患者理解,并对医疗决策产生负面影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e93/6834090/16cca4669235/cureus-0011-00000005857-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e93/6834090/5eb0ff8c088e/cureus-0011-00000005857-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e93/6834090/16cca4669235/cureus-0011-00000005857-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e93/6834090/5eb0ff8c088e/cureus-0011-00000005857-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e93/6834090/16cca4669235/cureus-0011-00000005857-i02.jpg

相似文献

1
Online Search Behavior for Cancer Immunotherapy Resources and Readability Analysis: An Opportunity to Aid in Medical Decision-making.癌症免疫治疗资源的在线搜索行为与可读性分析:助力医疗决策的契机
Cureus. 2019 Oct 7;11(10):e5857. doi: 10.7759/cureus.5857.
2
Readability analysis of online resources related to lung cancer.肺癌相关在线资源的可读性分析
J Surg Res. 2016 Nov;206(1):90-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.07.018. Epub 2016 Jul 16.
3
The readability of psychosocial wellness patient resources: improving surgical outcomes.心理社会健康患者资源的可读性:改善手术效果。
J Surg Res. 2017 Oct;218:43-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.033. Epub 2017 Jun 10.
4
Readability of online patient resources for the operative treatment of breast cancer.在线乳腺癌手术治疗患者资源的易读性。
Surgery. 2014 Aug;156(2):311-8. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.03.004. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
5
Readability Assessment of Online Patient Abdominoplasty Resources.在线腹部整形手术患者资源的可读性评估。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015 Feb;39(1):147-53. doi: 10.1007/s00266-014-0425-0. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
6
Readability of online materials for Dupuytren's contracture.在线 Dupuytren 挛缩材料的可读性。
J Hand Ther. 2018 Oct-Dec;31(4):472-479. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
7
Online patient resources for hernia repair: analysis of readability.疝修补术在线患者资源:可读性分析。
J Surg Res. 2014 Jul;190(1):144-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.03.045. Epub 2014 Mar 22.
8
Readability assessment of online gynecologic oncology patient education materials from major governmental, non-profit and pharmaceutical organizations.主要政府、非营利组织和制药机构的在线妇科肿瘤患者教育材料的可读性评估。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Sep;154(3):616-621. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.06.026. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
9
The Readability of Online Resources for Mastopexy Surgery.乳房上提手术在线资源的可读性
Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Jan;77(1):110-4. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000340.
10
An online readability analysis of pathology-related patient education articles: an opportunity for pathologists to educate patients.病理学相关患者教育文章的在线可读性分析:病理学家教育患者的契机。
Hum Pathol. 2017 Jul;65:15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2017.04.020. Epub 2017 May 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Modernizing Clinical Trials for Patients With Cancer.癌症患者临床试验的现代化
JAMA. 2019 Feb 5;321(5):447-448. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.18938.
2
Association of Patient Comorbid Conditions With Cancer Clinical Trial Participation.患者合并症与癌症临床试验参与的关联。
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Mar 1;5(3):326-333. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.5953.
3
Patient-Focused Online Resources for Melanoma: Highly Variable Content and Quality.以患者为中心的黑色素瘤在线资源:内容和质量高度可变
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Aug;34(4):775-781. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1372-2.
4
Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines: How Readable Are Internet-Based Patient Education Resources?肺癌筛查指南:基于互联网的患者教育资源的可读性如何?
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Jul;211(1):W42-W46. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.19042. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
5
Quality of Online Resources for Pancreatic Cancer Patients.胰腺癌患者在线资源的质量。
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Apr;34(2):223-228. doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1290-8.
6
Exciting middle and high school students about immunology: an easy, inquiry-based lesson.激发中学生对免疫学的兴趣:一堂简单的、基于探究的课程。
Immunol Res. 2013 Mar;55(1-3):201-9. doi: 10.1007/s12026-012-8363-x.
7
Shared decision making--pinnacle of patient-centered care.共同决策——以患者为中心的医疗的巅峰。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 1;366(9):780-1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1109283.
8
The Internet as a health information source: findings from the 2007 Health Information National Trends Survey and implications for health communication.互联网作为健康信息来源:2007 年健康信息国家趋势调查的结果及其对健康传播的启示。
J Health Commun. 2010;15 Suppl 3:279-93. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.522700.
9
Assessing readability of patient education materials: current role in orthopaedics.评估患者教育材料的可读性:矫形外科中的当前作用。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Oct;468(10):2572-80. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1380-y.
10
Understanding the health literacy of America: results of the National Assessment of Adult Literacy.了解美国的健康素养:成人识字率全国评估结果
Orthop Nurs. 2009 Jan-Feb;28(1):27-32; quiz 33-4. doi: 10.1097/01.NOR.0000345852.22122.d6.