Department of Interna6onal Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.
Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019 Dec;82 Suppl 3(3):S230-S243. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002216.
Evidence-based HIV interventions often fail to reach anticipated impact due to insufficient utilization in real-world health systems. Human-centered design (HCD) represents a novel approach in tailoring innovations to fit end-users, narrowing the gap between efficacious interventions and impact at scale.
We combined a narrative literature review of HCD in HIV programs with our experience using HCD to redesign an intervention promoting patient-centered care (PCC) practices among health care workers (HCW) in Zambia. We summarize the use and results of HCD in the global HIV response and share case study insights to advance conceptualization of HCD applications.
The literature review identified 13 articles (representing 7 studies) on the use of HCD in HIV. All studies featured HCD hallmarks including empathy development, user-driven inquiry, ideation, and iterative refinement. HCD was applied to mHealth design, a management intervention and pre-exposure prophylaxis delivery. Our HCD application addressed a behavioral service delivery target: changing HCW patient-centered beliefs, attitudes, and practices. Through in-depth developer-user interaction, our HCD approach revealed specific HCW support for and resistance to PCC, suggesting intervention revisions to improve feasibility and acceptability and PCC considerations that could inform implementation in transferable settings.
As both a research and implementation tool, HCD has potential to improve effective implementation of the HIV response, particularly for product development; new intervention introduction; and complex system interventions. Further research on HCD application strengths and limitations is needed. Those promoting PCC may improve implementation success by seeking out resonance and anticipating the challenges our HCD process identified.
由于在实际卫生系统中利用不足,基于证据的艾滋病毒干预措施往往无法达到预期效果。以人为中心的设计(HCD)代表了一种针对最终用户量身定制创新的新方法,缩小了有效干预措施与大规模影响之间的差距。
我们结合了对艾滋病毒项目中 HCD 的叙述性文献综述,以及我们使用 HCD 重新设计一项促进赞比亚卫生保健工作者(HCW)以患者为中心的护理(PCC)实践的干预措施的经验。我们总结了 HCD 在全球艾滋病毒应对中的使用情况和结果,并分享案例研究见解,以推进 HCD 应用的概念化。
文献综述确定了 13 篇关于 HCD 在艾滋病毒中的应用的文章(代表 7 项研究)。所有研究都具有 HCD 的标志,包括同理心的发展、用户驱动的探究、创意和迭代改进。HCD 应用于移动健康设计、管理干预和暴露前预防的提供。我们的 HCD 应用针对的是行为服务提供目标:改变 HCW 以患者为中心的信念、态度和实践。通过深入的开发者-用户互动,我们的 HCD 方法揭示了 HCW 对 PCC 的具体支持和抵制,这表明需要对干预措施进行修订,以提高可行性和可接受性,并考虑在可转移环境中实施 PCC。
作为一种研究和实施工具,HCD 有可能改善艾滋病毒应对措施的有效实施,特别是在产品开发、新干预措施的引入和复杂系统干预方面。需要进一步研究 HCD 应用的优势和局限性。那些提倡以患者为中心的人可以通过寻找共鸣和预测我们的 HCD 过程确定的挑战来提高实施的成功。