van der Wal Martijn B A, Tuinebreijer Wim E, Lundgren-Nilsson Åsa, Middelkoop Esther, van Zuijlen Paul P M
Association of Dutch Burn Centers, Beverwijk, The Netherlands,
Qual Life Res. 2014 Sep;23(7):2037-45. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0637-4. Epub 2014 Feb 9.
To investigate whether the Observer Scale of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) can serve as a generic measure for scar quality across different scar types.
A collection of POSAS scores derived from several clinical trials on burn (n = 404), linear (n = 384), and keloidal scars (n = 282) was analyzed using the partial credit model of the Rasch analysis package RUMM2030.
Differential item functioning (DIF) was observed for the Observer Scale of the POSAS between the three scar types for the items pliability, thickness, and surface area, which could be solved by item splitting. The items pigmentation and thickness showed disordered thresholds, considerable misfit, and unpredictability.
Users of the Observer Scale of the POSAS must be aware that the raw scores obtained from burn, linear, and keloidal scars cannot be compared without the scar-specific DIF adjustment of the items pliability, thickness, and surface area.
探讨患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表(POSAS)中的观察者量表是否可作为不同类型瘢痕质量的通用测量方法。
使用Rasch分析软件包RUMM2030的部分计分模型,分析了来自多项关于烧伤瘢痕(n = 404)、线性瘢痕(n = 384)和瘢痕疙瘩(n = 282)的临床试验中得出的POSAS评分。
在柔韧性、厚度和表面积这几个项目上,观察到POSAS观察者量表在三种瘢痕类型之间存在项目功能差异(DIF),可通过项目拆分解决。色素沉着和厚度这两个项目显示出阈值紊乱、严重不匹配和不可预测性。
POSAS观察者量表的使用者必须意识到,在未对柔韧性、厚度和表面积这几个项目进行特定瘢痕的DIF调整的情况下,从烧伤瘢痕、线性瘢痕和瘢痕疙瘩获得的原始分数无法进行比较。