• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优化在线遗传学资源,以满足不同读者的需求。

Optimizing genetics online resources for diverse readers.

机构信息

Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Institute for Human Genetics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Genet Med. 2020 Mar;22(3):640-645. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0695-7. Epub 2019 Nov 26.

DOI:10.1038/s41436-019-0695-7
PMID:31767985
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7056640/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Clear and accurate genetic information should be available to health-care consumers at an individualized level of comprehension. The objective of this study is to evaluate the complexity of common online resources and to simplify text content using automated text processing tools.

METHODS

We extracted all text from Genetics Home Reference and MedlinePlus in bulk and analyzed content using natural language processing. We applied custom tools to improve the readability and compared readability before and after text optimization.

RESULTS

Commonly used educational materials were more complex than the recommended reading level for the general public. Genetic health information entries from Genetics Home Reference (n = 1279) were written at a median 13.0 grade level. MedlinePlus entries, which are not exclusively genetic (n = 1030), had a median grade level of 7.7. When we optimized text for the 59 actionable conditions by prioritizing medical details using a standard structure, the average reading grade level improved.

CONCLUSION

Factors that increase complexity are long sentences and difficult words. Future strategies to reduce complexity include prioritizing relevant details and using more illustrations. Simplifying and providing standardized online health resources would benefit diverse consumers and promote inclusivity.

摘要

目的

医疗保健消费者应能在个人理解层面上获得清晰准确的遗传信息。本研究的目的是评估常见在线资源的复杂性,并使用自动化文本处理工具简化文本内容。

方法

我们从 Genetics Home Reference 和 MedlinePlus 中批量提取所有文本,并使用自然语言处理进行内容分析。我们应用自定义工具来提高可读性,并比较文本优化前后的可读性。

结果

常用的教育材料比普通公众的推荐阅读水平更为复杂。Genetics Home Reference(n=1279)中的遗传健康信息条目平均写作水平为 13.0 级。并非专门针对遗传信息的 MedlinePlus 条目(n=1030)的平均写作水平为 7.7 级。当我们通过使用标准结构优先考虑医疗细节来优化针对 59 种可操作条件的文本时,平均阅读水平得到了提高。

结论

增加复杂性的因素是长句子和难词。未来降低复杂性的策略包括优先考虑相关细节和使用更多插图。简化和提供标准化的在线健康资源将使不同的消费者受益,并促进包容性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45cd/7056640/57c942db9816/41436_2019_695_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45cd/7056640/31dedad83a86/41436_2019_695_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45cd/7056640/13eac4c55b38/41436_2019_695_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45cd/7056640/b68fc44774b0/41436_2019_695_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45cd/7056640/17551d9bce4d/41436_2019_695_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45cd/7056640/57c942db9816/41436_2019_695_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45cd/7056640/31dedad83a86/41436_2019_695_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45cd/7056640/13eac4c55b38/41436_2019_695_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45cd/7056640/b68fc44774b0/41436_2019_695_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45cd/7056640/17551d9bce4d/41436_2019_695_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45cd/7056640/57c942db9816/41436_2019_695_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Optimizing genetics online resources for diverse readers.优化在线遗传学资源,以满足不同读者的需求。
Genet Med. 2020 Mar;22(3):640-645. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0695-7. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
2
Quantitative readability analysis of websites providing information on traumatic brain injury and epilepsy: A need for clear communication.创伤性脑损伤和癫痫网站信息定量可读性分析:清晰沟通的必要性。
Epilepsia. 2020 Mar;61(3):528-538. doi: 10.1111/epi.16446. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
3
Readability of online Spanish patient education materials in dermatology.皮肤科在线西班牙语患者教育材料的可读性。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2021 Apr;313(3):201-204. doi: 10.1007/s00403-020-02036-7. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
4
An online readability analysis of pathology-related patient education articles: an opportunity for pathologists to educate patients.病理学相关患者教育文章的在线可读性分析:病理学家教育患者的契机。
Hum Pathol. 2017 Jul;65:15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2017.04.020. Epub 2017 May 10.
5
Readability of Spanish-Language Online Patient Educational Materials for Peripheral Artery Disease Do Not Meet Recommended Standards and Represent a Literacy Barrier to Care.西班牙语在线外周动脉疾病患者教育材料的可读性不符合推荐标准,代表了患者获取医疗服务的读写能力障碍。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2024 Apr;101:157-163. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.10.029. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
6
Readability of online materials for Dupuytren's contracture.在线 Dupuytren 挛缩材料的可读性。
J Hand Ther. 2018 Oct-Dec;31(4):472-479. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
7
Clearly written, easily comprehended? The readability of websites providing information on epilepsy.表述清晰,易于理解?提供癫痫信息的网站的可读性。
Epilepsy Behav. 2015 Mar;44:35-9. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.12.029. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
8
An Informatics Framework to Assess Consumer Health Language Complexity Differences: Proof-of-Concept Study.一种评估消费者健康语言复杂性差异的信息学框架:概念验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 21;22(5):e16795. doi: 10.2196/16795.
9
An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.评估关于尿道下裂治疗的在线健康信息的可读性、质量和准确性。
J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Feb;15(1):40.e1-40.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.08.020. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
10
Readability analysis of online resources related to lung cancer.肺癌相关在线资源的可读性分析
J Surg Res. 2016 Nov;206(1):90-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.07.018. Epub 2016 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
The ENGAGE study: evaluation of a conversational virtual agent that provides tailored pre-test genetic education to cancer patients.ENGAGE研究:评估为癌症患者提供个性化检测前基因教育的对话式虚拟代理。
J Cancer Surviv. 2025 Apr;19(2):623-632. doi: 10.1007/s11764-023-01495-x. Epub 2023 Dec 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Online Patient Education Materials for Orthognathic Surgery Fail to Meet Readability and Quality Standards.正颌外科手术的在线患者教育材料未达到可读性和质量标准。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jan;77(1):180.e1-180.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2018.08.033. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
2
Advances in Text Mining and Visualization for Precision Medicine.精准医学的文本挖掘与可视化进展。
Pac Symp Biocomput. 2018;23:559-565.
3
Marking 15 years of the Genetic and Rare Diseases Information Center.纪念遗传与罕见病信息中心成立15周年。
Transl Sci Rare Dis. 2017 May 25;2(1-2):77-88. doi: 10.3233/TRD-170011.
4
How do providers discuss the results of pediatric exome sequencing with families?医疗服务提供者如何与家庭讨论儿科外显子组测序的结果?
Per Med. 2017 Sep;14(5):409-422. doi: 10.2217/pme-2017-0015. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
5
Readability of online materials for Dupuytren's contracture.在线 Dupuytren 挛缩材料的可读性。
J Hand Ther. 2018 Oct-Dec;31(4):472-479. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
6
Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.临床外显子组和基因组测序中次要发现报告的建议,2016年更新版(美国医学遗传学与基因组学学会次要发现v2.0):美国医学遗传学与基因组学学会政策声明
Genet Med. 2017 Feb;19(2):249-255. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.190. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
7
Patient activation and the use of information to support informed health decisions.患者激活以及利用信息支持明智的健康决策。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Jan;100(1):5-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.07.006. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
8
Improving the readability of online foot and ankle patient education materials.提高在线足踝患者教育材料的可读性。
Foot Ankle Int. 2014 Dec;35(12):1282-6. doi: 10.1177/1071100714550650. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
9
Information-seeking and sharing behavior following genomic testing for diabetes risk.糖尿病风险基因检测后的信息寻求与分享行为。
J Genet Couns. 2015 Feb;24(1):58-66. doi: 10.1007/s10897-014-9736-1. Epub 2014 Jun 14.
10
Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review.低健康素养与健康结局:一项更新的系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jul 19;155(2):97-107. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005.