Saul R. Korey Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York.
University of North Carolina Wilmington, Wilmington, North Carolina.
Epilepsia. 2020 Mar;61(3):528-538. doi: 10.1111/epi.16446. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
The use of the Internet for health-related questions is increasing, but it is not clear whether individuals can understand the information available online. Most health organizations recommend that health educational materials (HEMs) be written below the sixth grade reading level. This study was designed to evaluate the readability level of available online HEMs pertaining to traumatic brain injury (TBI), epilepsy, and posttraumatic epilepsy (PTE).
This cross-sectional readability assessment included HEMs from TBI and epilepsy stakeholder organizations and those obtained from four Internet searches. The search strategy was designed to replicate a nonmedical individual's keyword searches. Each HEM was assessed with an online automated readability tool using three indices (Flesch Reading Ease Score, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook). Findings were compared as a function of organization type (journalistic news or health organization), targeted medical condition (TBI, epilepsy, or PTE), or content topic (patient health education, clinical research education, or both).
Readability analysis of 405 identified HEMs revealed scores above the sixth grade reading level recommendation. Only 6.2% of individual HEMs met the sixth grade recommendation. Journalistic news organizations' HEMs had similar readability levels to health organizations' HEMs. PTE-related HEMs required the highest readability level, >11th grade (P < .001). There were significant differences in the readability scores (P < .01 for all indices) among HEMs with information on health education, research education, or both topics. The highest required readability level (>12 grade level) was for HEMs that included both health and research education.
The majority of TBI-, epilepsy-, and PTE-related online HEMs do not meet the sixth grade reading recommendation. Improving the readability of HEMs may advance health literacy around TBI, epilepsy, and PTE, leading to more effective participant recruitment/retention strategies for future antiepileptogenesis trials in persons with TBI and perhaps better patient-centered outcomes.
人们越来越多地利用互联网查询健康相关问题,但目前尚不清楚人们是否能够理解在线信息。大多数健康组织建议,健康教育材料(HEMs)的写作水平应低于六年级阅读水平。本研究旨在评估有关创伤性脑损伤(TBI)、癫痫和外伤性癫痫(PTE)的在线 HEM 的可理解性水平。
本横断面可读性评估包括 TBI 和癫痫利益相关者组织的 HEMs 以及通过四项互联网搜索获得的 HEMs。该搜索策略旨在复制非医学个体的关键字搜索。每个 HEM 均使用三种指标(弗莱什阅读舒适度得分、弗莱什-金凯德年级水平和简单藻饰词得分)进行在线自动可读性工具评估。研究结果根据组织类型(新闻或健康组织)、目标医疗状况(TBI、癫痫或 PTE)或内容主题(患者健康教育、临床研究教育或两者兼有)进行比较。
对 405 种已识别 HEMs 的可读性分析显示,分数高于六年级阅读水平推荐值。只有 6.2%的单独 HEMs 符合六年级推荐值。新闻组织的 HEMs 的可读性水平与健康组织的 HEMs 相似。与 PTE 相关的 HEMs 需要最高的可读性水平,超过 11 年级(P<.001)。具有健康教育、研究教育或两者兼有的 HEMs 的可读性得分存在显著差异(所有指标的 P<.01)。同时包含健康教育和研究教育的 HEMs 需要最高的可读性水平(>12 年级)。
大多数与 TBI、癫痫和 PTE 相关的在线 HEMs 不符合六年级阅读推荐值。提高 HEMs 的可读性可能会提高 TBI、癫痫和 PTE 周围的健康素养,从而为未来在 TBI 患者中开展抗癫痫发生试验制定更有效的参与者招募/保留策略,并可能带来更好的以患者为中心的结果。