Department of Communication and Economics, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Viale A. Allegri 9, 42121, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Center for Neuroscience and Neurotechnology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via Campi 287, 41125, Modena, Italy.
Psychol Res. 2021 Mar;85(2):521-532. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01271-6. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
The Simon effect, that is the advantage of the spatial correspondence between stimulus and response locations when stimulus location is task irrelevant, occurs even when the task is performed by two participants, each performing a go/no-go task. This effect, known as the joint Simon effect, does not emerge when participants sit outside each other's peripersonal space, thus suggesting that the presence of an active confederate in peripersonal space might provide a reference for response coding. The present study investigated whether this finding is due to the distance separating the participants and/or to the distance separating each participant and the other agent's response. In two experiments, pairs of participants performed a social detection task sitting outside each other's arm reach, with response keys located close to the participants or outside arm reach. When the response key was located outside the participant's arm reach, he/she could reach it by means of a tool. In Experiment 1, by means of a tool, participants could reach their response key only, while in Experiment 2, they could reach also their co-agent's response key. The joint Simon effect did not emerge when participants could not reach the co-actor's response, while it emerged when they could potentially reach the other participant's response using the tool, but only when turn taking was required. These results may be taken as evidence that the possibility to reach and act upon the co-actor's response key may be at the bases of compatibility effects observed in joint action contexts requiring complementary responses.
西蒙效应是指在刺激与反应位置之间存在空间对应关系时,即使任务由两个参与者执行,每个参与者执行一个 Go/No-Go 任务,刺激位置与任务无关也会产生优势。这种效应称为联合西蒙效应,当参与者彼此的个人空间之外时,不会出现这种效应,这表明在个人空间中存在活跃的同盟者可能为反应编码提供参考。本研究探讨了这种发现是否是由于参与者之间的距离以及每个参与者与其他代理的反应之间的距离造成的。在两项实验中,参与者对坐在彼此手臂可及范围之外的社会检测任务进行了反应,反应键位于参与者附近或手臂可及范围之外。当反应键位于参与者手臂可及范围之外时,他/她可以通过工具到达反应键。在实验 1 中,参与者只能通过工具到达自己的反应键,而在实验 2 中,他们可以通过工具到达自己和同伴的反应键。当参与者无法触及共同作用者的反应键时,联合西蒙效应并未出现,而当他们可以使用工具潜在地触及另一个参与者的反应键,但需要轮流时,联合西蒙效应就会出现。这些结果可能表明,触及和作用于共同作用者反应键的可能性是在需要互补反应的联合行动情境中观察到的兼容性效应的基础。