• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共同作用者反应可达性在联合西蒙效应中的作用:工具使用对工作空间的重新映射。

The role of the co-actor's response reachability in the joint Simon effect: remapping of working space by tool use.

机构信息

Department of Communication and Economics, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Viale A. Allegri 9, 42121, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Center for Neuroscience and Neurotechnology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via Campi 287, 41125, Modena, Italy.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2021 Mar;85(2):521-532. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01271-6. Epub 2019 Nov 25.

DOI:10.1007/s00426-019-01271-6
PMID:31768627
Abstract

The Simon effect, that is the advantage of the spatial correspondence between stimulus and response locations when stimulus location is task irrelevant, occurs even when the task is performed by two participants, each performing a go/no-go task. This effect, known as the joint Simon effect, does not emerge when participants sit outside each other's peripersonal space, thus suggesting that the presence of an active confederate in peripersonal space might provide a reference for response coding. The present study investigated whether this finding is due to the distance separating the participants and/or to the distance separating each participant and the other agent's response. In two experiments, pairs of participants performed a social detection task sitting outside each other's arm reach, with response keys located close to the participants or outside arm reach. When the response key was located outside the participant's arm reach, he/she could reach it by means of a tool. In Experiment 1, by means of a tool, participants could reach their response key only, while in Experiment 2, they could reach also their co-agent's response key. The joint Simon effect did not emerge when participants could not reach the co-actor's response, while it emerged when they could potentially reach the other participant's response using the tool, but only when turn taking was required. These results may be taken as evidence that the possibility to reach and act upon the co-actor's response key may be at the bases of compatibility effects observed in joint action contexts requiring complementary responses.

摘要

西蒙效应是指在刺激与反应位置之间存在空间对应关系时,即使任务由两个参与者执行,每个参与者执行一个 Go/No-Go 任务,刺激位置与任务无关也会产生优势。这种效应称为联合西蒙效应,当参与者彼此的个人空间之外时,不会出现这种效应,这表明在个人空间中存在活跃的同盟者可能为反应编码提供参考。本研究探讨了这种发现是否是由于参与者之间的距离以及每个参与者与其他代理的反应之间的距离造成的。在两项实验中,参与者对坐在彼此手臂可及范围之外的社会检测任务进行了反应,反应键位于参与者附近或手臂可及范围之外。当反应键位于参与者手臂可及范围之外时,他/她可以通过工具到达反应键。在实验 1 中,参与者只能通过工具到达自己的反应键,而在实验 2 中,他们可以通过工具到达自己和同伴的反应键。当参与者无法触及共同作用者的反应键时,联合西蒙效应并未出现,而当他们可以使用工具潜在地触及另一个参与者的反应键,但需要轮流时,联合西蒙效应就会出现。这些结果可能表明,触及和作用于共同作用者反应键的可能性是在需要互补反应的联合行动情境中观察到的兼容性效应的基础。

相似文献

1
The role of the co-actor's response reachability in the joint Simon effect: remapping of working space by tool use.共同作用者反应可达性在联合西蒙效应中的作用:工具使用对工作空间的重新映射。
Psychol Res. 2021 Mar;85(2):521-532. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01271-6. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
2
Sharing a task or sharing space? On the effect of the confederate in action coding in a detection task.共享任务还是共享空间?关于同伴在检测任务中的动作编码中的影响。
Cognition. 2010 Mar;114(3):348-55. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.008. Epub 2009 Nov 14.
3
Spatial Response Discrimination May Elicit a Simon Effect on a Non-Complementary Task.空间反应辨别可能在非互补任务上引发 Simon 效应。
Percept Mot Skills. 2024 Feb;131(1):59-73. doi: 10.1177/00315125231215854. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
4
The influence of the Japanese waving cat on the joint spatial compatibility effect: A replication and extension of Dolk, Hommel, Prinz, and Liepelt (2013).日本招财猫对关节空间兼容性效应的影响:对多尔克、霍梅尔、普林茨和利佩尔特(2013年)的一项重复研究及拓展
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 14;12(9):e0184844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184844. eCollection 2017.
5
Sharing tasks or sharing actions? Evidence from the joint Simon task.共享任务还是共享动作?来自联合西蒙任务的证据。
Psychol Res. 2018 Mar;82(2):385-394. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0821-y. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
6
Action-space coding in social contexts.社会情境中的动作空间编码。
Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 4;6:22673. doi: 10.1038/srep22673.
7
Inverting the joint Simon effect by intention.意图反转联合西蒙效应。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Oct;19(5):914-20. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0283-1.
8
The Virtual Co-Actor: The Social Simon Effect does not Rely on Online Feedback from the Other.虚拟共演者:社会西蒙效应不依赖于来自他人的在线反馈。
Front Psychol. 2010 Dec 3;1:208. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00208. eCollection 2010.
9
How a co-actor's task affects monitoring of own errors: evidence from a social event-related potential study.共同行为者的任务如何影响自身错误监控:来自社会事件相关电位研究的证据。
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jun;211(3-4):397-404. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2615-1. Epub 2011 Mar 22.
10
When co-action eliminates the Simon effect: disentangling the impact of co-actor's presence and task sharing on joint-task performance.当共同作用消除西蒙效应时:解析共同作用者的存在和任务分担对联合任务表现的影响。
Front Psychol. 2013 Nov 19;4:844. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00844. eCollection 2013.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence of cognitive load and social context on co-representation in joint actions.认知负荷和社会背景对联合行动中共同表征的影响。
Cogn Process. 2025 Jul 17. doi: 10.1007/s10339-025-01292-7.
2
Co-representation breaks down beyond the dyad in UK adults.在英国成年人中,共同表征在二元组之外就会瓦解。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 25;20(2):e0318545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318545. eCollection 2025.
3
Wearing the face mask affects our social attention over space.佩戴口罩会影响我们在空间上的社交注意力。

本文引用的文献

1
Response Coordination Emerges in Cooperative but Not Competitive Joint Task.反应协调出现在合作性而非竞争性联合任务中。
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 9;9:1919. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01919. eCollection 2018.
2
When a Social Experimenter Overwrites Effects of Salient Objects in an Individual Go/No-Go Simon Task - An ERP Study.当社会实验者在个体的简单反应时西蒙任务中覆盖显著物体的效应——一项事件相关电位研究
Front Psychol. 2018 May 17;9:674. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00674. eCollection 2018.
3
Whose turn is it anyway? The moderating role of response-execution certainty on the joint Simon effect.
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 4;13:923558. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.923558. eCollection 2022.
4
Action prediction modulates self-other integration in joint action.动作预测调节共同动作中的自我-他人整合。
Psychol Res. 2023 Mar;87(2):537-552. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01674-y. Epub 2022 May 4.
5
Number to me, space to you: Joint representation of spatial-numerical associations.数字对我,空格对你:空间-数字联合表示。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Apr;29(2):485-491. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-02013-9. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
到底该谁来?反应执行确定性对联合西蒙效应的调节作用。
Psychol Res. 2019 Jul;83(5):833-841. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0901-7. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
4
The joint flanker effect and the joint Simon effect: On the comparability of processes underlying joint compatibility effects.联合侧翼效应与联合西蒙效应:关于联合兼容性效应背后过程的可比性
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Sep;70(9):1808-1823. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1207690. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
5
Action-space coding in social contexts.社会情境中的动作空间编码。
Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 4;6:22673. doi: 10.1038/srep22673.
6
Task representation in individual and joint settings.个体和联合情境中的任务表征。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 May 12;9:268. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00268. eCollection 2015.
7
Spatial parameters at the basis of social transfer of learning.学习社会传递基础上的空间参数。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Jun;41(3):840-9. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000047. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
8
Dynamic expansion of alert responses to incoming painful stimuli following tool use.使用工具后对传入疼痛刺激的警报反应的动态扩展。
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Apr;70:486-94. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.01.019. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
9
Referential coding does not rely on location features: Evidence for a nonspatial joint Simon effect.参照编码不依赖于位置特征:非空间联合西蒙效应的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Feb;41(1):186-95. doi: 10.1037/a0038548. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
10
The joint Simon effect: a review and theoretical integration.联合西蒙效应:综述与理论整合。
Front Psychol. 2014 Sep 5;5:974. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00974. eCollection 2014.