• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

虚拟共演者:社会西蒙效应不依赖于来自他人的在线反馈。

The Virtual Co-Actor: The Social Simon Effect does not Rely on Online Feedback from the Other.

机构信息

Cognitive Psychology Unit, Leiden University Leiden, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2010 Dec 3;1:208. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00208. eCollection 2010.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00208
PMID:21833264
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3153814/
Abstract

The social Simon effect (SSE) occurs if two participants share a Simon task by making a Go/No-Go response to one of two stimulus features. If the two participants perform this version of the Simon task together, a Simon effect occurs (i.e., performance is better with spatial stimulus-response correspondence), but no effect is observed if participants perform the task separately. The SSE has been attributed to the automatic co-representation of the co-actor's actions, which suggests that it relies on online information about the other's actions. To test this implication, we investigated whether the SSE varies with the presence and amount of online action-related feedback from the other person. Experiment 1 replicated the SSE with auditory stimuli. Experiment 2, in which participants were blindfolded, demonstrated that visual feedback from the other's actions is not necessary for the SSE to occur. Experiment 3 replicated Experiment 2 with a regular and a soundless keyboard. A comparable SSE was obtained in both conditions, suggesting that even auditory online input from the other's actions is not necessary. Taken together, our data suggest that the SSE does not rely on online information about the co-actor's actions but that a priori offline information about another actor's presence is sufficient to generate the effect.

摘要

社会西蒙效应(SSE)如果两个参与者通过对两个刺激特征之一做出是/否反应来共同执行西蒙任务,则会发生。如果两个参与者一起执行此版本的西蒙任务,则会出现西蒙效应(即,与空间刺激-反应对应更好),但如果参与者分别执行任务,则不会观察到效果。SSE 归因于共同作用者动作的自动共同表示,这表明它依赖于有关其他人动作的在线信息。为了检验这一含义,我们研究了 SSE 是否随其他人提供的在线动作相关反馈的存在和数量而变化。实验 1 用听觉刺激复制了 SSE。实验 2 中,参与者被蒙住眼睛,证明其他人动作的视觉反馈对于 SSE 的发生并非必需。实验 3 使用常规键盘和无声键盘复制了实验 2。在两种情况下均获得了可比的 SSE,表明即使来自他人动作的听觉在线输入也不是必需的。综上所述,我们的数据表明,SSE 不依赖于关于共同作用者动作的在线信息,而是需要关于另一个作用者存在的先验离线信息才能产生该效应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b40/3153814/cfb5d27e1c7e/fpsyg-01-00208-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b40/3153814/00a1aa4fb6bc/fpsyg-01-00208-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b40/3153814/df3bf1748ef0/fpsyg-01-00208-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b40/3153814/cfb5d27e1c7e/fpsyg-01-00208-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b40/3153814/00a1aa4fb6bc/fpsyg-01-00208-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b40/3153814/df3bf1748ef0/fpsyg-01-00208-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b40/3153814/cfb5d27e1c7e/fpsyg-01-00208-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The Virtual Co-Actor: The Social Simon Effect does not Rely on Online Feedback from the Other.虚拟共演者:社会西蒙效应不依赖于来自他人的在线反馈。
Front Psychol. 2010 Dec 3;1:208. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00208. eCollection 2010.
2
How "social" is the social Simon effect?社会西蒙效应有多“社会”?
Front Psychol. 2011 May 6;2:84. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00084. eCollection 2011.
3
When co-action eliminates the Simon effect: disentangling the impact of co-actor's presence and task sharing on joint-task performance.当共同作用消除西蒙效应时:解析共同作用者的存在和任务分担对联合任务表现的影响。
Front Psychol. 2013 Nov 19;4:844. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00844. eCollection 2013.
4
The role of the co-actor's response reachability in the joint Simon effect: remapping of working space by tool use.共同作用者反应可达性在联合西蒙效应中的作用:工具使用对工作空间的重新映射。
Psychol Res. 2021 Mar;85(2):521-532. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01271-6. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
5
Action prediction modulates self-other integration in joint action.动作预测调节共同动作中的自我-他人整合。
Psychol Res. 2023 Mar;87(2):537-552. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01674-y. Epub 2022 May 4.
6
Sharing tasks or sharing actions? Evidence from the joint Simon task.共享任务还是共享动作?来自联合西蒙任务的证据。
Psychol Res. 2018 Mar;82(2):385-394. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0821-y. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
7
The Multimodal Go-Nogo Simon Effect: Signifying the Relevance of Stimulus Features in the Go-Nogo Simon Paradigm Impacts Event Representations and Task Performance.多模态停止信号西蒙效应:表明在停止信号西蒙范式中刺激特征的相关性对事件表征和任务表现的影响
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 25;9:2011. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02011. eCollection 2018.
8
The influence of the Japanese waving cat on the joint spatial compatibility effect: A replication and extension of Dolk, Hommel, Prinz, and Liepelt (2013).日本招财猫对关节空间兼容性效应的影响:对多尔克、霍梅尔、普林茨和利佩尔特(2013年)的一项重复研究及拓展
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 14;12(9):e0184844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184844. eCollection 2017.
9
When a Social Experimenter Overwrites Effects of Salient Objects in an Individual Go/No-Go Simon Task - An ERP Study.当社会实验者在个体的简单反应时西蒙任务中覆盖显著物体的效应——一项事件相关电位研究
Front Psychol. 2018 May 17;9:674. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00674. eCollection 2018.
10
Enhanced encoding of the co-actor's target stimuli during a shared non-motor task.在一项共享的非运动任务中对共同参与者的目标刺激进行增强编码。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016 Dec;69(12):2376-2389. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1120332. Epub 2016 Apr 1.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence of advanced information on co-representation in a shared finger precuing task.先进信息对共享手指预提示任务中共同表征的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2025 Jul 2;243(7):183. doi: 10.1007/s00221-025-07128-2.
2
Choice history biases in dyadic decision making.二元决策中的选择历史偏差。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 3;15(1):11420. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96182-5.
3
Association between Reaction Times in the Joint Simon Task and Personality Traits.联合西蒙任务中的反应时间与人格特质之间的关联。

本文引用的文献

1
Top-down modulation of motor priming by belief about animacy.基于对生物性的信念对运动启动的自上而下调节。
Exp Psychol. 2010;57(3):221-7. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000028.
2
How social are task representations?任务表示法有多社会化?
Psychol Sci. 2009 Jul;20(7):794-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02367.x. Epub 2009 May 21.
3
Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding).基于TEC(事件编码理论)的动作控制。
Brain Sci. 2023 Aug 15;13(8):1207. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13081207.
4
Beyond speaking: neurocognitive perspectives on language production in social interaction.超越言语:社会互动中语言产生的神经认知视角。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Apr 24;378(1875):20210483. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0483. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
5
Reaction time coupling in a joint stimulus-response task: A matter of functional actions or likable agents?联合刺激-反应任务中的反应时耦合:是功能动作还是可爱的代理的问题?
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 12;17(7):e0271164. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271164. eCollection 2022.
6
Interference in the shared-Stroop task: a comparison of self- and other-monitoring.共享斯特鲁普任务中的干扰:自我监测与他人监测的比较。
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Apr 27;9(4):220107. doi: 10.1098/rsos.220107. eCollection 2022 Apr.
7
Joint Simon effect in movement trajectories.运动轨迹中的联合西蒙效应。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 29;16(12):e0261735. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261735. eCollection 2021.
8
Sequential aiming in pairs: the multiple levels of joint action.成对顺序瞄准:联合行动的多个层次。
Exp Brain Res. 2021 May;239(5):1479-1488. doi: 10.1007/s00221-021-06060-5. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
9
Effect of perceived interpersonal closeness on the joint Simon effect in adolescents and adults.感知人际亲近度对青少年和成年人联合西蒙效应的影响。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 22;10(1):18107. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74859-3.
10
Embodied self-other overlap in romantic love: a review and integrative perspective.浪漫爱情中的具身自我-他人重叠:综述与综合观点。
Psychol Res. 2021 Apr;85(3):899-914. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01301-8. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
Psychol Res. 2009 Jul;73(4):512-26. doi: 10.1007/s00426-009-0234-2. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
4
What is matched in direct matching? Intention attribution modulates motor priming.直接匹配中匹配的是什么?意图归因调节运动启动。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Jun;34(3):578-91. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.3.578.
5
Action co-representation is tuned to other humans.动作共同表征是针对其他人进行调整的。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Nov;20(11):2015-24. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20144.
6
Does the human motor system simulate Pinocchio's actions? Coacting with a human hand versus a wooden hand in a dyadic interaction.人类运动系统会模拟匹诺曹的动作吗?在二元互动中与人类的手而非木手协同动作。
Psychol Sci. 2007 Dec;18(12):1058-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02025.x.
7
Seeing vs. believing: Is believing sufficient to activate the processes of response co-representation?眼见为实还是信以为真:相信是否足以激活共同表征反应的过程?
Hum Mov Sci. 2007 Dec;26(6):853-66. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2007.06.003. Epub 2007 Oct 15.
8
A short history of ideo-motor action.观念运动动作简史。
Psychol Res. 2004 Apr;68(2-3):176-88. doi: 10.1007/s00426-003-0154-5. Epub 2003 Dec 18.
9
Representing others' actions: just like one's own?呈现他人的行为:与自己的行为一样吗?
Cognition. 2003 Jul;88(3):B11-21. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00043-x.
10
Effect anticipation and action control.效果预期与行动控制。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001 Feb;27(1):229-40. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.27.1.229.