• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知负荷和社会背景对联合行动中共同表征的影响。

The influence of cognitive load and social context on co-representation in joint actions.

作者信息

Han Yizhen, Zhang Xinyuan

机构信息

School of Psychology, Northeast Normal University, No.5268 Renmin Street, Changchun, 130024, China.

Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Brain Development, Changchun, China.

出版信息

Cogn Process. 2025 Jul 17. doi: 10.1007/s10339-025-01292-7.

DOI:10.1007/s10339-025-01292-7
PMID:40676435
Abstract

Co-representation refers to the phenomenon where individuals integrate others' behaviors into their own representations during joint actions. The impact of cooperation and competition on co-representation has long been controversial. This study employed the joint Simon task to explore the influence of social context (cooperative vs. competitive) on co-representation under varying cognitive loads. The findings reveal a significant Simon effect in the solo Simon task group, cooperative group and competition group (Experiment 1), regardless of the presence of additional cognitive load, but not in the solo go-nogo task group (Experiment 2). However, Experiments 1 and 2 both showed that there was no significant interaction between social context and compatibility on RT. Moreover, there was no significant change in Simon effect under different cognitive loads in both cooperative group and competition group in Experiment 1 and 2. Our findings demonstrate that individuals maintain co-representation of co-actors' behaviors in both cooperative and competitive contexts. However, despite the additional cognitive load, individuals continue to co-represent others in both cooperation and competition, suggesting that the cognitive load introduced in current study is not sufficient to disrupt the co-representation. We discuss these findings in the context of the JSE's task co-representation theory and integrated social-cognitive accounts.

摘要

共同表征是指个体在联合行动中将他人的行为整合到自己的表征中的现象。合作与竞争对共同表征的影响长期以来一直存在争议。本研究采用联合西蒙任务来探究社会情境(合作与竞争)在不同认知负荷下对共同表征的影响。研究结果显示,在单独西蒙任务组、合作组和竞争组中(实验1),无论是否存在额外的认知负荷,都存在显著的西蒙效应,但在单独的停止信号任务组中(实验2)不存在。然而,实验1和实验2均表明,社会情境与兼容性在反应时上不存在显著交互作用。此外,在实验1和实验2中,合作组和竞争组在不同认知负荷下的西蒙效应均无显著变化。我们的研究结果表明,个体在合作和竞争情境中均保持对共同行动者行为的共同表征。然而,尽管存在额外的认知负荷,个体在合作和竞争中仍继续对他人进行共同表征,这表明本研究中引入的认知负荷不足以扰乱共同表征。我们将在联合行动选择的任务共同表征理论和综合社会认知解释的背景下讨论这些发现。

相似文献

1
The influence of cognitive load and social context on co-representation in joint actions.认知负荷和社会背景对联合行动中共同表征的影响。
Cogn Process. 2025 Jul 17. doi: 10.1007/s10339-025-01292-7.
2
The influence of advanced information on co-representation in a shared finger precuing task.先进信息对共享手指预提示任务中共同表征的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2025 Jul 2;243(7):183. doi: 10.1007/s00221-025-07128-2.
3
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
4
Understanding Camouflaging, Stigma, and Mental Health for Autistic People in Japan.了解日本自闭症患者的伪装、污名化与心理健康。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 Feb 5;7(1):52-65. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0035. eCollection 2025 Feb.
5
Psychological interventions for adults who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending.针对有性犯罪行为或有性犯罪风险的成年人的心理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD007507. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007507.pub2.
6
Physical exercise training interventions for children and young adults during and after treatment for childhood cancer.针对儿童癌症治疗期间及治疗后的儿童和青少年的体育锻炼训练干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 31;3(3):CD008796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008796.pub3.
7
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
8
Interventions for preventing weight gain after smoking cessation.戒烟后预防体重增加的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jan 18;1:CD006219. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006219.pub3.
9
Direct-acting antivirals for chronic hepatitis C.用于慢性丙型肝炎的直接作用抗病毒药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 18;9(9):CD012143. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012143.pub3.
10
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.

本文引用的文献

1
Towards integrating joint action research: Developmental and evolutionary perspectives on co-representation.迈向联合行动研究的整合:共同表象的发展与进化视角。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022 Dec;143:104924. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104924. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
2
Metacontrol and joint action: how shared goals transfer from one task to another?元控制与联合行动:共享目标如何从一项任务转移到另一项任务?
Psychol Res. 2021 Oct;85(7):2769-2781. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01443-9. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
3
Raising the bar: Can dual scanning improve our understanding of joint action?
提高标准:双重扫描能否增进我们对联合动作的理解?
Neuroimage. 2020 Aug 1;216:116813. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116813. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
4
The role of the co-actor's response reachability in the joint Simon effect: remapping of working space by tool use.共同作用者反应可达性在联合西蒙效应中的作用:工具使用对工作空间的重新映射。
Psychol Res. 2021 Mar;85(2):521-532. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01271-6. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
5
Response Coordination Emerges in Cooperative but Not Competitive Joint Task.反应协调出现在合作性而非竞争性联合任务中。
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 9;9:1919. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01919. eCollection 2018.
6
Are You Keeping an Eye on Me? The Influence of Competition and Cooperation on Joint Simon Task Performance.你在盯着我吗?竞争与合作对联合西蒙任务表现的影响。
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 3;9:1361. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01361. eCollection 2018.
7
The unimanual handle-to-hand correspondence effect: evidence for a location coding account.单手手动对应效应:位置编码解释的证据。
Psychol Res. 2019 Oct;83(7):1383-1399. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1009-4. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
8
Controlled information processing, automaticity, and the burden of proof.受控信息处理、自动化和举证责任。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Oct;25(5):1814-1823. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1412-7.
9
Competitive Game Play Attenuates Self-Other Integration during Joint Task Performance.竞争性游戏行为会削弱联合任务执行过程中的自我-他人整合。
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 3;7:274. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00274. eCollection 2016.
10
Social task switching: On the automatic social engagement of executive functions.社交任务转换:关于执行功能的自动社交参与
Cognition. 2016 Jan;146:223-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.001. Epub 2015 Nov 9.