• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在英国成年人中,共同表征在二元组之外就会瓦解。

Co-representation breaks down beyond the dyad in UK adults.

作者信息

Milward Sophie J, Whitehouse Jamie

机构信息

University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, United Kingdom.

Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Feb 25;20(2):e0318545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318545. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0318545
PMID:39999116
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11856543/
Abstract

Cooperation is so deeply embedded in human psychology that we spontaneously track a partner's task as well as our own when acting in a pair. This automatic 'co-representation' of a partner's mental representation of their task has been argued to be key to the sophisticated social coordination we see in human adults. However, our day-to-day encounters are not limited to one-to-one interactions. This is the first published study to investigate co-representation in groups, with results from a group Joint Simon task suggesting that co-representation may break down in groups larger than two. Exploratory analyses also suggested a complex interplay between spatial and social relationships between individual members within a group. We propose a novel hypothesis based on these findings: when we lack the capacity to track everyone in a group, we may be able to selectively track those who are the most salient or relevant. This provides key information about the limits of our capacity to keep others in mind, and the psychological underpinnings of how we do so.

摘要

合作深深植根于人类心理,以至于当两人一起行动时,我们会自然而然地关注合作伙伴的任务以及我们自己的任务。有人认为,这种对合作伙伴任务心理表征的自动“共同表征”是我们在成年人类身上看到的复杂社会协调的关键。然而,我们的日常交往并不局限于一对一的互动。这是第一项发表的关于群体中共同表征的研究,一项群体联合西蒙任务的结果表明,在超过两人的群体中,共同表征可能会瓦解。探索性分析还表明,群体中个体成员之间的空间关系和社会关系之间存在复杂的相互作用。基于这些发现,我们提出了一个新的假设:当我们没有能力追踪群体中的每一个人时,我们或许能够有选择地追踪那些最突出或最相关的人。这提供了关于我们在心中记住他人能力的局限性以及我们如何做到这一点的心理基础的关键信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c06/11856543/1ea9bab6d61b/pone.0318545.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c06/11856543/fc4ed9fd21d7/pone.0318545.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c06/11856543/3a38a2d71daf/pone.0318545.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c06/11856543/261847b2fce8/pone.0318545.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c06/11856543/f9428d3b50f3/pone.0318545.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c06/11856543/c6026bd5afba/pone.0318545.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c06/11856543/458239d4e2d2/pone.0318545.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c06/11856543/78e6f72f5c0b/pone.0318545.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c06/11856543/1ea9bab6d61b/pone.0318545.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c06/11856543/fc4ed9fd21d7/pone.0318545.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c06/11856543/3a38a2d71daf/pone.0318545.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c06/11856543/261847b2fce8/pone.0318545.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c06/11856543/f9428d3b50f3/pone.0318545.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c06/11856543/c6026bd5afba/pone.0318545.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c06/11856543/458239d4e2d2/pone.0318545.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c06/11856543/78e6f72f5c0b/pone.0318545.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c06/11856543/1ea9bab6d61b/pone.0318545.g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Co-representation breaks down beyond the dyad in UK adults.在英国成年人中,共同表征在二元组之外就会瓦解。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 25;20(2):e0318545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318545. eCollection 2025.
2
Individual differences in co-representation in three monkey species (Callithrix jacchus, Sapajus apella and Macaca tonkeana) in the joint Simon task: the role of social factors and inhibitory control.三种猴子物种(Callithrix jacchus、Sapajus apella 和 Macaca tonkeana)在联合 Simon 任务中的共同表象的个体差异:社会因素和抑制控制的作用。
Anim Cogn. 2022 Dec;25(6):1399-1415. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01622-8. Epub 2022 May 5.
3
Group membership affects spontaneous mental representation: failure to represent the out-group in a joint action task.群体成员身份会影响自发的心理表征:在联合行动任务中无法表征外群体。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 20;8(11):e79178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079178. eCollection 2013.
4
The development of co-representation effects in a joint task: do children represent a co-actor?联合任务中共同表征效应的发展:儿童是否会表征共同行动者?
Cognition. 2014 Sep;132(3):269-79. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.04.008. Epub 2014 May 20.
5
Does implicit mentalizing involve the representation of others' mental state content? Examining domain-specificity with an adapted Joint Simon task.内隐心理化是否涉及对他人心理状态内容的表征?使用改编后的联合西蒙任务检验领域特异性。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Aug 14;11(8):230239. doi: 10.1098/rsos.230239. eCollection 2024 Aug.
6
Action co-representation and the sense of agency during a joint Simon task: Comparing human and machine co-agents.共同行动表象与联合 Simon 任务中的主体感:人类与机器共同代理人的比较。
Conscious Cogn. 2019 Jan;67:44-55. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2018.11.008. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
7
Flexible social monitoring as revealed by eye movements: Spontaneous mental state updating triggered by others' unexpected actions.灵活的社会监测:他人意料之外的行为引发的自发性心理状态更新。
Cognition. 2024 Aug;249:105812. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105812. Epub 2024 May 18.
8
Competitive children, cooperative mothers? Effect of various social factors on the retrospective and prospective use of theory of mind.竞争型儿童,合作型母亲?各种社会因素对心理理论回溯和前瞻使用的影响。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Feb;190:104715. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104715. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
9
The influence of the Japanese waving cat on the joint spatial compatibility effect: A replication and extension of Dolk, Hommel, Prinz, and Liepelt (2013).日本招财猫对关节空间兼容性效应的影响:对多尔克、霍梅尔、普林茨和利佩尔特(2013年)的一项重复研究及拓展
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 14;12(9):e0184844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184844. eCollection 2017.
10
The carry-over effect of competition in task-sharing: evidence from the joint Simon task.任务共享中竞争的延续效应:来自联合西蒙任务的证据。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 4;9(6):e97991. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097991. eCollection 2014.

本文引用的文献

1
Joint action with human and robotic co-actors: Self-other integration is immune to the perceived humanness of the interacting partner.与人类和机器人共同参与者的联合行动:自我-他人整合不受互动伙伴所感知的人性影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Jan;77(1):70-89. doi: 10.1177/17470218231158481. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
2
Action co-representation under threat: A Social Simon study.动作共同表象在威胁下:一项社会西蒙研究。
Cognition. 2021 Oct;215:104829. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104829. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
3
Excluded but not alone. Does social exclusion prevent the occurrence of a Joint Simon Effect (JSE)?
被排除在外,但并不孤单。社会排斥是否会阻止联合西蒙效应(JSE)的发生?
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2021 Jul;218:103337. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103337. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
4
Effect of perceived interpersonal closeness on the joint Simon effect in adolescents and adults.感知人际亲近度对青少年和成年人联合西蒙效应的影响。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 22;10(1):18107. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74859-3.
5
Embodied self-other overlap in romantic love: a review and integrative perspective.浪漫爱情中的具身自我-他人重叠:综述与综合观点。
Psychol Res. 2021 Apr;85(3):899-914. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01301-8. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
6
The role of the co-actor's response reachability in the joint Simon effect: remapping of working space by tool use.共同作用者反应可达性在联合西蒙效应中的作用:工具使用对工作空间的重新映射。
Psychol Res. 2021 Mar;85(2):521-532. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01271-6. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
7
Seeing it both ways: Using a double-cuing task to investigate the role of spatial cuing in Level-1 visual perspective-taking.两种视角看待:运用双重线索任务探究空间线索在一级视觉视角采择中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 May;44(5):693-702. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000486. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
8
Level-2 perspectives computed quickly and spontaneously: Evidence from eight- to 9.5-year-old children.快速且自发计算出的二级视角:来自8至9.5岁儿童的证据。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2017 Nov;35(4):609-622. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12201. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
9
Individual Differences in Children's Corepresentation of Self and Other in Joint Action.儿童在联合行动中自我与他人核心表征的个体差异。
Child Dev. 2017 May;88(3):964-978. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12693. Epub 2016 Dec 14.
10
Mechanisms and development of self-other distinction in dyads and groups.二元组和群体中自我与他人区分的机制与发展。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Jan 19;371(1686):20150076. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0076.