Center for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Julius Center for Health Sciences & Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J Public Health Policy. 2020 Mar;41(1):39-51. doi: 10.1057/s41271-019-00206-0.
Public health policymakers face increasingly complex questions and decisions and need to deal with an increasing quantity of data and information. For policy advisors to make use of scientific evidence and to assess available intervention options effectively and therefore indirectly for those deciding on and implementing public health policies, mathematical modeling has proven to be a useful tool. In some areas, the use of mathematical modeling for public health policy support has become standard practice at various levels of decision-making. To make use of this tool effectively within public health organizations, it is necessary to provide good infrastructure and ensure close collaboration between modelers and policymakers. Based on experience from a national public health institute, we discuss the strategic requirements for good modeling practice for public health. For modeling to be of maximal value for a public health institute, the organization and budgeting of mathematical modeling should be transparent, and a long-term strategy for how to position and develop mathematical modeling should be in place.
公共卫生政策制定者面临日益复杂的问题和决策,需要处理越来越多的数据和信息。为了使政策顾问能够利用科学证据,并有效地评估现有干预措施的选择,因此也间接地为那些决定和实施公共卫生政策的人提供帮助,数学建模已被证明是一种有用的工具。在某些领域,在各级决策中使用数学建模来支持公共卫生政策已成为标准做法。为了在公共卫生组织中有效地利用这一工具,有必要提供良好的基础设施,并确保建模人员和政策制定者之间的密切合作。基于国家公共卫生研究所的经验,我们讨论了公共卫生良好建模实践的战略要求。为了使建模对公共卫生机构具有最大的价值,数学建模的组织和预算应该是透明的,并且应该制定长期的战略来确定和发展数学建模。