Altan Şallı Gülay, Egil Edibe
Quintessence Int. 2020;51(1):78-85. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a43665.
OBJECTIVES: Video sharing sites are a popular and useful way to spread information. The aim of this study was to evaluate information about oral care for leukemia patients and quality of information related to videos available on YouTube. METHOD AND MATERIALS: In this cross-sectional study, YouTube videos were analyzed according to the information content. The search was performed in English and using the search term: leukemia/oral care. The following information was registered: date of upload, source of upload, duration, total views, number of likes, number of dislikes, number of comments, overall quality. The overall quality of videos was assessed using the following quality criteria presented in the Global Quality Scale (GQS): poor, generally poor, moderate, good, and excellent. In addition, videos were classified as useful, misleading, and patient personal experience. Videos were assessed in terms of definition, etiology, pathogenesis, symptoms, treatment, and oral care for leukemia. RESULTS: Sixty-three videos (78.8%) were classified as useful, 6 (7.5%) as misleading and 11 (13.8%) as a patient's personal experience. Thirteen videos (16.3%) discussed the definition of leukemia, 8 (10.0%) discussed etiology, 6 (7.5%) discussed pathogenesis, 7 (8.8%) discussed symptoms of leukemia, 50 (62.5%) discussed treatment choices, and 15 videos (18.8%) discussed oral care of leukemia. Thirteen videos (16.3%) were assessed as poor, 17 (21.3%) as generally poor, 39 (48.8%) as moderate, 10 (12.5%) as good quality, and 1 (1.3%) as excellent. There was a significant difference between the content of videos and the number of views, number of likes, number of dislikes, and number of comments (P < .05). There was a significant difference between the content of videos and number of views, number of likes, number of dislikes, and number of comments (P = .007, P = .006, P = .049, and P = .011 respectively). There was no significant difference between demographic parameters and quality of video. There was no significant difference between demographic parameters (except duration, P = .025) and source of information. CONCLUSIONS: YouTube is a useful source of information on leukemia. Health care professionals should take into consideration that YouTube is an effective information tool for the patient.
目的：视频分享网站是传播信息的一种流行且有用的方式。本研究的目的是评估有关白血病患者口腔护理的信息以及YouTube上与视频相关的信息质量。 方法和材料：在这项横断面研究中，根据信息内容对YouTube视频进行分析。搜索以英文进行，使用的搜索词为：白血病/口腔护理。记录了以下信息：上传日期、上传来源、时长、总观看次数、点赞数、点踩数、评论数、整体质量。使用全球质量量表（GQS）中提出的以下质量标准评估视频的整体质量：差、一般差、中等、好和优秀。此外，视频被分类为有用、误导性和患者个人经历。从白血病的定义、病因、发病机制、症状、治疗和口腔护理方面对视频进行评估。 结果：63个视频（78.8%）被分类为有用，6个（7.5%）为误导性，11个（13.8%）为患者个人经历。13个视频（16.3%）讨论了白血病的定义，8个（10.0%）讨论了病因，6个（7.5%）讨论了发病机制，7个（8.8%）讨论了白血病的症状，50个（62.5%）讨论了治疗选择，15个视频（18.8%）讨论了白血病的口腔护理。13个视频（16.3%）被评估为差，17个（21.3%）为一般差，39个（48.8%）为中等，10个（12.5%）质量为好，1个（1.3%）为优秀。视频内容与观看次数、点赞数、点踩数和评论数之间存在显著差异（P <.05）。视频内容与观看次数、点赞数、点踩数和评论数之间存在显著差异（分别为P =.007、P =.006、P =.049和P =.011）。人口统计学参数与视频质量之间无显著差异。人口统计学参数（除时长外，P =.025）与信息来源之间无显著差异。 结论：YouTube是有关白血病的有用信息来源。医疗保健专业人员应考虑到YouTube是患者的有效信息工具。
Quintessence Int. 2020
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021-6-7
J Prosthet Dent. 2023-4
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019-9
J Pediatr Urol. 2021-8
Int J Rheum Dis. 2021-2
Spec Care Dentist. 2020-9
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2023-6
Int J Dent Hyg. 2022-8
JMIR Form Res. 2025-2-10
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022-9-23
Future Oncol. 2022-3
J Med Internet Res. 2021-7-6
Zotero 插件