Suppr超能文献

使用深度卷积神经网络方法与其他常见回归方法预测胶质母细胞瘤患者 EGFR 表达的效率比较。

A Comparison of the Efficiency of Using a Deep CNN Approach with Other Common Regression Methods for the Prediction of EGFR Expression in Glioblastoma Patients.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

Science and Research Branch, Daneshgah Blvd, Simon Bulivar Blvd, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

J Digit Imaging. 2020 Apr;33(2):391-398. doi: 10.1007/s10278-019-00290-4.

Abstract

To estimate epithermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression level in glioblastoma (GBM) patients using radiogenomic analysis of magnetic resonance images (MRI). A comparative study using a deep convolutional neural network (CNN)-based regression, deep neural network, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, elastic net regression, and linear regression with no regularization was carried out to estimate EGFR expression of 166 GBM patients. Except for the deep CNN case, overfitting was prevented by using feature selection, and loss values for each method were compared. The loss values in the training phase for deep CNN, deep neural network, Elastic net, LASSO, and the linear regression with no regularization were 2.90, 8.69, 7.13, 14.63, and 21.76, respectively, while in the test phase, the loss values were 5.94, 10.28, 13.61, 17.32, and 24.19 respectively. These results illustrate that the efficiency of the deep CNN approach is better than that of the other methods, including Lasso regression, which is a regression method known for its advantage in high-dimension cases. A comparison between deep CNN, deep neural network, and three other common regression methods was carried out, and the efficiency of the CNN deep learning approach, in comparison with other regression models, was demonstrated.

摘要

利用磁共振成像(MRI)的放射基因组分析来估计胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)患者的表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)表达水平。采用基于深度卷积神经网络(CNN)的回归、深度神经网络、最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归、弹性网络回归和无正则化的线性回归进行了比较研究,以估计 166 名 GBM 患者的 EGFR 表达。除了深度 CNN 情况外,还通过使用特征选择来防止过拟合,并比较了每种方法的损失值。在训练阶段,深度 CNN、深度神经网络、弹性网络、LASSO 和无正则化的线性回归的损失值分别为 2.90、8.69、7.13、14.63 和 21.76,而在测试阶段,损失值分别为 5.94、10.28、13.61、17.32 和 24.19。这些结果表明,深度 CNN 方法的效率优于其他方法,包括 Lasso 回归,Lasso 回归是一种在高维情况下具有优势的回归方法。对深度 CNN、深度神经网络和其他三种常见回归方法进行了比较,证明了 CNN 深度学习方法与其他回归模型相比的效率。

相似文献

7
Radiogenomics model for overall survival prediction of glioblastoma.基于影像组学的胶质母细胞瘤总生存预测模型
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2020 Aug;58(8):1767-1777. doi: 10.1007/s11517-020-02179-9. Epub 2020 Jun 3.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Deep learning for identifying radiogenomic associations in breast cancer.深度学习在乳腺癌放射基因组关联识别中的应用。
Comput Biol Med. 2019 Jun;109:85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.04.018. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
3
Radiomics and radiogenomics of primary liver cancers.原发性肝癌的影像组学和放射组学。
Clin Mol Hepatol. 2019 Mar;25(1):21-29. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2018.1007. Epub 2018 Nov 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验