Kitajima Maiko, Mikami Kasumi, Noto Yuka, Itaki Chieko, Fukushi Yasuyo, Hirota Yoshiko, Mariya Yasushi, Tsushima Megumi, Kattou Keiichi, Osanai Tomohiro
Department of Nursing Science, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Health Science, Hirosaki, Aomori 036-8564, Japan.
Department of Radiology, Mutsu General Hospital, Mutsu, Aomori 035-8601, Japan.
Mol Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan;12(1):89-93. doi: 10.3892/mco.2019.1948. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
Assessment of skin condition is necessary for providing advice regarding skin self-care to patients with breast cancer who have undergone radiation therapy. Acute and chronic phases of radiodermatitis were analyzed in patients using objective assessment tools in the present study. A total of 18 women who received radiation therapy for breast cancer were enrolled in the present study and their skin surface temperature (SST), hydration level of the skin surface (HL), melanin intensity (MI) and erythema intensity (EI) were measured prior to radiation therapy and six months thereafter. Furthermore, skin condition was assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). EI and MI levels at the irradiated site peaked upon the completion of radiation therapy and declined to baseline at 6 months. In contrast, SST levels were elevated at the irradiated site during radiation therapy (P<0.05) and plateaued after its completion. The same parameters in non-irradiated control sites remained unchanged during the study period. HL reached the minimum in irradiated and non-irradiated sites upon completion of radiation therapy. Although HL returned to baseline in the non-irradiated site 6 months after radiation therapy, it remained low in the irradiated site. No relationship between the CTCAE and EI level was observed. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that objective assessment tools, including SST and EI levels, were useful for assessing skin condition during radiodermatitis. The combination of the CTCAE and objective assessment tools will enable a more accurate assessment of radiodermatitis.
对于接受过放射治疗的乳腺癌患者,评估其皮肤状况对于提供皮肤自我护理建议是必要的。在本研究中,使用客观评估工具分析了放射性皮炎的急性和慢性阶段。本研究共纳入了18名接受乳腺癌放射治疗的女性,在放射治疗前及之后6个月测量了她们的皮肤表面温度(SST)、皮肤表面水合水平(HL)、黑色素强度(MI)和红斑强度(EI)。此外,使用不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)评估皮肤状况。放射治疗结束时,照射部位的EI和MI水平达到峰值,并在6个月时降至基线。相比之下,放射治疗期间照射部位的SST水平升高(P<0.05),治疗结束后趋于平稳。在研究期间,未照射对照部位的相同参数保持不变。放射治疗结束时,照射部位和未照射部位的HL均达到最低值。虽然放射治疗6个月后未照射部位的HL恢复到基线水平,但照射部位的HL仍保持较低水平。未观察到CTCAE与EI水平之间的关系。总之,本研究表明,包括SST和EI水平在内的客观评估工具可用于评估放射性皮炎期间的皮肤状况。CTCAE与客观评估工具相结合将能够更准确地评估放射性皮炎。