Department of Didactic of Musical, Plastic and Corporal Expression, Faculty of Humanities and Education Sciences, University of Jaen.
Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada.
J Sports Sci Med. 2019 Nov 19;18(4):586-595. eCollection 2019 Dec.
Among adolescents empirical studies examining the total daily steps translation of the moderate-to-vigorous physical activity recommendation are scarce and inconsistent, and there are no previous studies with cadence-based steps and related to sedentary behavior. The main objective of the present study was to establish and compare the accuracy of daily step-based recommendations related to the moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and sedentary behavior thresholds in adolescents. The present study followed a cross-sectional design. A total of 126 adolescents (56 girls) aged 12-15 years old were assessed by ActiGraph GT3X accelerometers for eight consecutive days (moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, sedentary behavior, and steps) and the multistage 20-meter shuttle run test (cardiorespiratory fitness). ROC curve analyses showed that total daily steps (AUC = 0.94, 0.89-0.99; Threshold ≥ 11,111 steps/ day; = 0.93; = 0.67; < 0.001) was a more appropriate indicator than cadence-based daily steps for distinguishing between physically active and inactive adolescents. Daily step-based thresholds represent a promising way to translate a total daily sedentary behavior threshold (e.g., total daily steps, AUC = 0.87, 0.81-0.93; Sensitivity = 0.87; Specificity = 0.70). Adolescents who met a favorable combination of step-based recommendations related to both physical activity and sedentary behavior thresholds had a higher probability of having a healthy cardiorespiratory fitness profile than those who did not meet either of them (e.g., risk ratio = 5.05, 1.69-15.08) or only the one related to physical activity (e.g., risk ratio = 4.09, 1.36-12.29). These findings may help policy-makers to provide accurate daily step-based recommendations that would simplify the physical activity and sedentary behavior thresholds for adolescents.
在青少年中,关于中等到剧烈体力活动推荐的总步数的实证研究很少且不一致,并且以前没有基于步频的与久坐行为相关的研究。本研究的主要目的是建立和比较与中等到剧烈体力活动和久坐行为阈值相关的基于日常步数的推荐的准确性在青少年中。本研究采用横断面设计。共有 126 名 12-15 岁的青少年(56 名女孩)使用 ActiGraph GT3X 加速度计连续 8 天(中等到剧烈体力活动、久坐行为和步数)和多阶段 20 米穿梭跑测试(心肺适能)进行评估。ROC 曲线分析表明,总日步数(AUC = 0.94,0.89-0.99;阈值≥11111 步/天; = 0.93; = 0.67;<0.001)是区分活跃和不活跃青少年的更合适指标比基于步频的每日步数。基于每日步数的阈值代表了一种有前途的方法,可以将总日久坐行为阈值(例如,总日步数,AUC = 0.87,0.81-0.93;灵敏度 = 0.87;特异性 = 0.70)。与体力活动和久坐行为阈值相关的基于步数的推荐都符合的青少年,比不符合的青少年(例如,风险比 = 5.05,1.69-15.08)或仅符合体力活动相关的青少年(例如,风险比 = 4.09,1.36-12.29)更有可能拥有健康的心肺适能。这些发现可能有助于决策者提供准确的基于日常步数的建议,从而简化青少年的体力活动和久坐行为阈值。