• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Why 'case finding' is bad science.为何“病例发现”是糟糕的科学。
J R Soc Med. 2020 Feb;113(2):54-58. doi: 10.1177/0141076819891422. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
2
Restoring confidence.恢复信心。
Nurs Stand. 1997;12(6):16. doi: 10.7748/ns.12.6.16.s29.
3
Audit of an official recommendation on screening for congenital dislocation of the hip.关于先天性髋关节脱位筛查官方建议的审核
BMJ. 1991 Jun 15;302(6790):1435-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6790.1435.
4
Realising the potential benefit of screening. Comment on the outcomes of the first Austrian Screening Guidelines Consensus Conference.认识到筛查的潜在益处。对首届奥地利筛查指南共识会议的结果进行评论。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2001 Jan 15;113(1-2):4-6.
5
Developing screening in the NHS.在英国国家医疗服务体系中开展筛查工作。
J Med Screen. 1994 Apr;1(2):101-5. doi: 10.1177/096914139400100208.
6
The impact of national diabetic retinopathy screening on ophthalmology: the need for urgent planning.国家糖尿病视网膜病变筛查对眼科的影响：迫切需要进行规划。
Eye (Lond). 2005 Sep;19(9):1009-11. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6701751.
7
Trends in the organization of cervical cancer screening.宫颈癌筛查组织的趋势。
J R Soc Health. 1990 Feb;110(1):17-9. doi: 10.1177/146642409011000108.
8
Planning for quality in the NHS breast screening programme.英国国家医疗服务体系乳腺筛查计划中的质量规划。
Qual Health Care. 1992 Jun;1(2):119-23. doi: 10.1136/qshc.1.2.119.
9
Decision to reject screening for familial hypercholesterolaemia is flawed.拒绝进行家族性高胆固醇血症筛查的决定存在缺陷。
Arch Dis Child. 2021 Jun;106(6):525-526. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-319168. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
10
The audit of cervical cytology screening programmes: discussion paper.宫颈细胞学筛查项目审计：讨论文件
J R Soc Med. 1991 Aug;84(8):488-90. doi: 10.1177/014107689108400813.

引用本文的文献

1
Community views on active case finding for tuberculosis in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对在中低收入国家开展结核病主动筛查的看法：一项定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Mar 21;3(3):CD014756. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014756.pub2.
2
Why do people choose not to take part in screening? Qualitative interview study of atrial fibrillation screening nonparticipation.为什么人们选择不参与筛查？房颤筛查不参与的定性访谈研究。
Health Expect. 2023 Dec;26(6):2216-2227. doi: 10.1111/hex.13819. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
3
Burden and treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among people using illicit opioids: matched cohort study in England.使用非法阿片类药物人群中慢性阻塞性肺疾病的负担及治疗：英格兰的配对队列研究
BMJ Med. 2022 Sep 28;1(1):e000215. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000215. eCollection 2022.
4
Why do people take part in atrial fibrillation screening? Qualitative interview study in English primary care.为什么人们参与心房颤动筛查？英国初级保健中的定性访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 16;12(3):e051703. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051703.
5
Repairing boundaries along pathways to tuberculosis case detection: a qualitative synthesis of intervention designs.修复结核病病例发现途径中的边界：干预设计的定性综合。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Jan 10;20(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00811-0.
6
What is the balance of benefits and harms for lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography?低剂量计算机断层扫描用于肺癌筛查的利弊平衡是什么？
J R Soc Med. 2021 Apr;114(4):164-170. doi: 10.1177/0141076821991108. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
7
Response to 'Why case finding is bad science'.对《为何病例发现是糟糕的科学》的回应。
J R Soc Med. 2020 Mar;113(3):92. doi: 10.1177/0141076820903496.
8
Bad science in a plastic world.塑料世界中的伪科学。
J R Soc Med. 2020 Feb;113(2):47. doi: 10.1177/0141076820905749.

本文引用的文献

1
An Australian community jury to consider case-finding for dementia: Differences between informed community preferences and general practice guidelines.澳大利亚社区陪审团审议痴呆症病例发现：知情社区偏好与全科医学指南之间的差异。
Health Expect. 2019 Jun;22(3):475-484. doi: 10.1111/hex.12871. Epub 2019 Feb 3.
2
Screening for Atrial Fibrillation With Electrocardiography: Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.心电图筛查心房颤动：美国预防服务工作组的证据报告和系统评价。
JAMA. 2018 Aug 7;320(5):485-498. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.4190.
3
Risks and benefits of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in a real world setting: cohort study in primary care.直接口服抗凝剂与华法林在真实世界环境中的风险和获益：初级保健中的队列研究。
BMJ. 2018 Jul 4;362:k2505. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2505.
4
NHS waiting times: number of patients waiting 18 weeks for treatment rises sharply.英国国家医疗服务体系（NHS）候诊时间：等待18周接受治疗的患者数量大幅上升。
BMJ. 2018 May 11;361:k2114. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2114.
5
Implementing lung cancer screening: baseline results from a community-based 'Lung Health Check' pilot in deprived areas of Manchester.实施肺癌筛查：曼彻斯特贫困地区社区“肺部健康检查”试点的基线结果。
Thorax. 2019 Apr;74(4):405-409. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-211377. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
6
Montgomery and informed consent: where are we now?蒙哥马利案与知情同意：我们如今处于何种境地？
BMJ. 2017 May 12;357:j2224. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j2224.
7
Final screening round of the NELSON lung cancer screening trial: the effect of a 2.5-year screening interval.NELSON 肺癌筛查试验的最终筛查轮次：2.5 年筛查间隔的影响。
Thorax. 2017 Jan;72(1):48-56. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-208655. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
8
Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: a systematic review to update the US Preventive services task force recommendation.用低剂量计算机断层扫描进行肺癌筛查：系统评价以更新美国预防服务工作组的建议。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Sep 17;159(6):411-420. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-6-201309170-00690.

Why 'case finding' is bad science.

作者信息

McCartney Margaret, Fell Greg, Finnikin Sam, Hunt Harriet, McHugh Mike, Gray Muir

机构信息

Glasgow, UK.

Director of Public Health, Sheffield, Town Hall, Pinstone Street, Sheffield, S1 2HH, UK.

出版信息

J R Soc Med. 2020 Feb;113(2):54-58. doi: 10.1177/0141076819891422. Epub 2019 Dec 12.

DOI:10.1177/0141076819891422
PMID:31829072
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7068767/
Abstract
摘要