Department of Biomedical Sciences, Biomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 116 N Robertson Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
Department of Imaging and Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Cardiovasc Res. 2020 Dec 1;116(14):2216-2225. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvz321.
Our aim was to evaluate the performance of machine learning (ML), integrating clinical parameters with coronary artery calcium (CAC), and automated epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) quantification, for the prediction of long-term risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and cardiac death in asymptomatic subjects.
Our study included 1912 asymptomatic subjects [1117 (58.4%) male, age: 55.8 ± 9.1 years] from the prospective EISNER trial with long-term follow-up after CAC scoring. EAT volume and density were quantified using a fully automated deep learning method. ML extreme gradient boosting was trained using clinical co-variates, plasma lipid panel measurements, risk factors, CAC, aortic calcium, and automated EAT measures, and validated using repeated 10-fold cross validation. During mean follow-up of 14.5 ± 2 years, 76 events of MI and/or cardiac death occurred. ML obtained a significantly higher AUC than atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk and CAC score for predicting events (ML: 0.82; ASCVD: 0.77; CAC: 0.77, P < 0.05 for all). Subjects with a higher ML score (by Youden's index) had high hazard of suffering events (HR: 10.38, P < 0.001); the relationships persisted in multivariable analysis including ASCVD-risk and CAC measures (HR: 2.94, P = 0.005). Age, ASCVD-risk, and CAC were prognostically important for both genders. Systolic blood pressure was more important than cholesterol in women, and the opposite in men.
In this prospective study, machine learning used to integrate clinical and quantitative imaging-based variables significantly improves prediction of MI and cardiac death compared with standard clinical risk assessment. Following further validation, such a personalized paradigm could potentially be used to improve cardiovascular risk assessment.
我们的目的是评估机器学习(ML)的性能,将临床参数与冠状动脉钙(CAC)以及自动心外膜脂肪组织(EAT)定量相结合,用于预测无症状受试者的长期心肌梗死(MI)和心脏死亡风险。
我们的研究纳入了来自前瞻性 EISNER 试验的 1912 名无症状受试者[1117 名(58.4%)男性,年龄:55.8±9.1 岁],这些受试者在 CAC 评分后进行了长期随访。使用完全自动化的深度学习方法来定量 EAT 体积和密度。使用临床协变量、血浆脂质谱测量值、危险因素、CAC、主动脉钙和自动 EAT 测量值训练 ML 极端梯度增强,并使用重复的 10 折交叉验证进行验证。在平均 14.5±2 年的随访期间,发生了 76 例 MI 和/或心脏死亡事件。ML 在预测事件方面获得了显著高于 ASCVD 风险和 CAC 评分的 AUC(ML:0.82;ASCVD:0.77;CAC:0.77,P<0.05 均为所有)。通过 Youden 指数获得较高 ML 评分的受试者发生事件的风险较高(HR:10.38,P<0.001);在包括 ASCVD 风险和 CAC 测量值的多变量分析中,这种关系仍然存在(HR:2.94,P=0.005)。年龄、ASCVD 风险和 CAC 对两性都是预后重要的因素。收缩压在女性中比胆固醇更重要,而在男性中则相反。
在这项前瞻性研究中,用于整合临床和基于定量成像变量的机器学习显著提高了与标准临床风险评估相比 MI 和心脏死亡的预测。在进一步验证后,这种个性化的范例有可能用于改善心血管风险评估。