Suppr超能文献

十二个建筑项目的安全管理与安全绩效的对比分析。

A comparative analysis of safety management and safety performance in twelve construction projects.

机构信息

Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Department of Industrial Economics and Technology Management, NO-7491, Trondheim, Norway.

Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Department of Industrial Economics and Technology Management, NO-7491, Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

J Safety Res. 2019 Dec;71:139-152. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.09.015. Epub 2019 Nov 13.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Safety management in construction is complicated due to the complex "nature" of the construction industry. The aim of this research was to identify safety management factors (e.g., risk management and site management), contextual factors (e.g., organisational complexity) and combinations of such factors connected to safety performance.

METHOD

Twelve construction projects were selected to compare their safety management and safety performance. An analytical framework was developed based on previous research, regulations, and standards where each management factor was defined. We employed qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) to produce case knowledge, compare the cases, and identify connections between the factors and safety performance. The material collected and analyzed included, for example, construction planning documents, reports from OHS-inspections, safety indicators, and interviews with project leaders and OHS experts.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The research showed that: (a) the average score on 12 safety management factors was higher among projects with high safety performance compared to projects with low safety performance; (b) high safety performance can be achieved with both high and low construction complexity and organizational complexity, but these factors complicate coordination of actors and operations; (c) it is possible to achieve high safety performance despite relatively poor performance on many safety management factors; (d) eight safety management factors were found to be "necessary" for high safety performance, namely roles and responsibilities, project management, OHS management and integration, safety climate, learning, site management, staff management, and operative risk management. Site management, operative risk management, and staff management were the three factors most strongly connected to safety performance.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Construction stakeholders should understand that the ability to achieve high safety performance in construction projects is connected to key safety management factors, contextual factors, and combinations of such factors.

摘要

简介

由于建筑行业的复杂“性质”,建筑施工安全管理较为复杂。本研究旨在识别安全管理因素(如风险管理和现场管理)、情境因素(如组织复杂性)以及与安全绩效相关的这些因素组合。

方法

选择了 12 个施工项目来比较它们的安全管理和安全绩效。基于以往的研究、法规和标准,开发了一个分析框架,其中定义了每个管理因素。我们采用定性比较分析(QCA)来生成案例知识、比较案例,并确定因素与安全绩效之间的联系。收集和分析的材料包括,例如,施工计划文件、职业健康与安全检查报告、安全指标以及与项目领导和职业健康与安全专家的访谈。

结果与结论

研究表明:(a)与安全绩效较低的项目相比,安全绩效较高的项目的 12 个安全管理因素的平均得分更高;(b)高安全绩效可以在高施工复杂性和组织复杂性以及低施工复杂性和组织复杂性的情况下实现,但这些因素会使协调行动者和操作复杂化;(c)尽管在许多安全管理因素方面表现相对较差,但仍有可能实现高安全绩效;(d)发现有 8 个安全管理因素对于高安全绩效是“必要的”,即角色和责任、项目管理、职业健康与安全管理和整合、安全氛围、学习、现场管理、员工管理和作业风险管理。现场管理、作业风险管理和员工管理是与安全绩效最相关的三个因素。

实践意义

建筑利益相关者应该明白,在建筑项目中实现高安全绩效的能力与关键安全管理因素、情境因素以及这些因素的组合有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验