Suppr超能文献

比较使用 550µm 和 1000µm 光纤直径的钬激光前列腺剜除术时光纤降解和围手术期结果。

Comparison of laser fiber degradation and perioperative outcomes following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate using 550 and 1000 µm fiber diameters.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 1801 Senate Blvd. Suite 220, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.

出版信息

Int Urol Nephrol. 2020 Apr;52(4):639-644. doi: 10.1007/s11255-019-02359-z. Epub 2019 Dec 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare perioperative and post-operative outcomes for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) between cases performed with a 550 µm or 1000 µm fiber.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the most recent 50 patients undergoing HoLEP with a 550 µm fiber and the most recent 50 patients with a 1000 µm fiber. The length of exposed laser fiber after stripping was measured pre- and post-enucleation, with the difference being our primary outcome of degradation length. We compared operative and clinical characteristics between patients undergoing HoLEP using 550 and 1000 µm laser fibers.

RESULTS

All 100 patients met inclusion for analysis. Overall, the 550 µm fiber experienced more degradation than the 1000 µm fiber (2.9 vs 1.9 cm, respectively; p = 0.01). The 1000 µm fiber utilized significantly less energy compared to the 500 µm fiber (81 vs 109 kJ, respectively; p < 0.01). In addition, operations performed with the 1000 versus the 500 µm fiber were overall shorter (79 vs 88 min, respectively; p = 0.03), although both groups had statistically similar times for enucleation (45 vs 51 min, respectively; p = 0.42) and morcellation (10 vs 9 min, respectively; p = 0.50). These findings occurred in the context of statistically similar prostate weight enucleated and bladder stones treated between groups. Post-operatively patients experienced no difference in blood loss or dysuria.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the 1000 µm fiber resulted in significantly less fiber degradation, energy requirement, and total operative time during HoLEP, in spite of similar prostate size and time required for enucleation and morcellation. Different fiber diameters do not appear to affect post-operative blood loss or dysuria.

摘要

目的

比较使用 550µm 和 1000µm 光纤行钬激光前列腺剜除术(HoLEP)的围手术期和术后结果。

方法

我们回顾性分析了最近 50 例行 550µm 光纤 HoLEP 的患者和最近 50 例行 1000µm 光纤 HoLEP 的患者。剥离子后暴露的激光光纤长度在剜除前后进行测量,差异为我们的主要降解长度结果。我们比较了使用 550µm 和 1000µm 激光光纤行 HoLEP 的患者的手术和临床特征。

结果

所有 100 例患者均符合纳入分析标准。总体而言,550µm 光纤的降解程度高于 1000µm 光纤(分别为 2.9cm 和 1.9cm;p=0.01)。1000µm 光纤的能量消耗明显低于 550µm 光纤(分别为 81kJ 和 109kJ;p<0.01)。此外,与 500µm 光纤相比,1000µm 光纤的手术时间更短(分别为 79min 和 88min;p=0.03),尽管两组的前列腺切除时间(分别为 45min 和 51min;p=0.42)和粉碎时间(分别为 10min 和 9min;p=0.50)均无统计学差异。这些发现是在两组之间统计学相似的前列腺切除重量和膀胱结石处理的情况下发生的。术后,两组患者的出血量和排尿困难无差异。

结论

尽管前列腺大小和切除及粉碎时间相似,但在 HoLEP 中使用 1000µm 光纤可显著减少光纤降解、能量需求和总手术时间。不同光纤直径似乎不会影响术后出血量或排尿困难。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验