Gayed Aimée, Tan Leona, LaMontagne Anthony D, Milner Allison, Deady Mark, Milligan-Saville Josie S, Madan Ira, Calvo Rafael A, Christensen Helen, Mykletun Arnstein, Glozier Nicholas, Harvey Samuel B
School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Black Dog Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Internet Interv. 2019 Jul 13;18:100258. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2019.100258. eCollection 2019 Dec.
In recognition of the important role managers play in the well-being of the staff they supervise, many workplaces are implementing specialised training for leaders to help them better understand and support the mental health needs of their staff. This training can be delivered through face-to-face or online training sessions. Evaluation of such programs have found positive results for each format when compared to a control group, but to date, face-to-face and online manager mental health training have not been compared with one another.
This study brings together results from two trials evaluating the same program content, each employing a different mode of content delivery. Both types of training aimed to change managers' confidence to better support the mental health needs of the staff they supervise.
Utilising data derived from two previously conducted trials, mean change in manager confidence from baseline at both post-intervention and follow-up were examined for each method of content delivery. An identical way of measuring confidence was used in each study.
Managers' confidence improved from baseline with both methods of training. A greater change was observed with face-to-face training than for online, although both methods had sustained improvement over time. Analyses indicate that at follow-up, improvements in confidence were significant for both face-to-face ( = 5.99; < .001) and online training ( = 3.85; < .001). Analyses focused on managers who fully completed either type of training indicated very similar impacts for face-to-face and online training.
Both face-to-face and online delivery of manager mental health training can significantly improve managers' confidence in supporting the mental health needs of their staff. This change is sustained over various follow-up periods. However, lower retention rates common in online training reduce the relative effect of this method of delivery.
鉴于认识到管理者在其监督的员工福祉中所起的重要作用,许多工作场所正在为领导者开展专门培训,以帮助他们更好地理解和支持员工的心理健康需求。这种培训可以通过面对面或在线培训课程进行。与对照组相比,对此类项目的评估发现,每种形式都有积极成果,但迄今为止,面对面和在线管理者心理健康培训尚未相互比较。
本研究汇总了两项评估相同项目内容的试验结果,每项试验采用不同的内容交付模式。两种培训类型都旨在改变管理者的信心,以便更好地支持他们所监督员工的心理健康需求。
利用先前进行的两项试验得出的数据,针对每种内容交付方法,检查干预后和随访时管理者信心相对于基线的平均变化。每项研究都采用相同的信心测量方法。
两种培训方法都使管理者的信心从基线水平有所提高。与在线培训相比,面对面培训的变化更大,不过两种方法随着时间推移都有持续改善。分析表明,在随访时,面对面培训( = 5.99; <.001)和在线培训( = 3.85; <.001)的信心改善都很显著。针对完全完成任一类型培训的管理者的分析表明,面对面培训和在线培训的影响非常相似。
面对面和在线开展管理者心理健康培训都能显著提高管理者在支持员工心理健康需求方面的信心。这种变化在不同的随访期内持续存在。然而,在线培训中常见的较低留存率降低了这种交付方式的相对效果。