Department of Chemistry , Washington University , St. Louis , Missouri 63130 , United States.
Acc Chem Res. 2020 Jan 21;53(1):135-143. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00578. Epub 2019 Dec 31.
For many years, we have been looking at electrochemistry as a tool for exploring, developing, and implementing new synthetic methods for the construction of organic molecules. Those efforts examined electrochemical methods and mechanisms and then exploited them for synthetic gain. Chief among the tools utilized was the fact that in a constant current electrolysis the working potential at the electrodes automatically adjusted to the oxidation (anode) or reduction (cathode) potential of the substrates in solution. This allowed for a systematic examination of the radical cation intermediates that are involved in a host of oxidative cyclization reactions. The result has been a series of structure-activity studies that have led to far greater insight into the behavior of radical cation intermediates and in turn an expansion in our capabilities of using those intermediates to trigger interesting synthetic reactions. With that said, the relationship between synthetic organic chemistry and electrochemistry is not a "one-way" interaction. For example, we have been using modern synthetic methodology to construct complex addressable molecular surfaces on electroanalytical devices that in turn can be used to probe biological interactions between small molecules and biological receptors in "real-time". Synthetic chemistry can then be used to recover the molecules that give rise to positive signals so that they can be characterized. The result is an analytical method that both gives accurate data on the interactions and provides a unique level of quality control with respect to the molecules giving rise to that data. Synthetic organic chemistry is essential to this task because it is our ability to synthesize the surfaces that defines the nature of the biological problems that can be studied. But the relationship between the fields does not end there. Recently, we have begun to show that work to expand the scope of microelectrode arrays as bioanalytical devices is teaching us important lessons for preparative synthetic chemistry. These lessons come in two forms. First, the arrays have taught us about the on-site generation of chemical reagents, a lesson that is being used to expand the use of paired electrochemical strategies for synthesis. Second, the arrays have taught us that reagents can be generated and then confined to the surface of the electrode used for that generation. This has led to a new approach to taking advantage of molecular recognition events that occur on the surface of an electrode for controlling the selectivity of a preparative reaction. In short, the confinement strategy developed for the arrays is used to ensure that the chemistry in a preparative electrolysis happens at the electrode surface and not in the bulk solution. This Account details the interplay between synthetic chemistry and electrochemistry in our group through the years and highlights the opportunities that interplay has provided and will continue to provide in the future.
多年来,我们一直将电化学视为探索、开发和实施构建有机分子的新合成方法的工具。这些努力研究了电化学方法和机制,然后利用它们获得了合成收益。其中最重要的工具之一是,在恒流电解中,电极的工作电势会自动调整到溶液中底物的氧化(阳极)或还原(阴极)电势。这允许系统地检查涉及许多氧化环化反应的自由基阳离子中间体。其结果是一系列的结构-活性研究,使我们对自由基阳离子中间体的行为有了更深入的了解,并反过来扩展了我们利用这些中间体引发有趣的合成反应的能力。话虽如此,合成有机化学与电化学之间的关系并不是“单向”的。例如,我们一直在使用现代合成方法在电分析装置上构建复杂的可寻址分子表面,反过来又可以用于实时探测小分子与生物受体之间的生物相互作用。然后可以使用合成化学来回收产生正信号的分子,以便对其进行表征。其结果是一种分析方法,既提供了关于相互作用的准确数据,又对产生该数据的分子提供了独特水平的质量控制。合成有机化学对于这项任务至关重要,因为正是我们合成表面的能力决定了可以研究的生物学问题的性质。但这两个领域的关系并不止于此。最近,我们开始表明,扩展微电极阵列作为生物分析装置的范围的工作正在为我们的制备合成化学提供重要的教训。这些教训有两种形式。首先,这些阵列教会了我们关于现场生成化学试剂的知识,这一教训正在被用于扩展配对电化学策略在合成中的应用。其次,这些阵列教会了我们可以生成试剂并将其限制在用于该生成的电极表面。这导致了一种利用发生在电极表面的分子识别事件来控制制备反应选择性的新方法。简而言之,为这些阵列开发的限制策略用于确保在制备电解中发生的化学在电极表面而不是在本体溶液中。本账目详细说明了这些年来我们小组中合成化学和电化学之间的相互作用,并强调了这种相互作用提供的机会,并将在未来继续提供机会。