Elayeh Eman R, Hammad Eman A, Tubeileh Razan H, Basheti Iman A
MSc. Department of Biopharmaceutics and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Jordan. Amman (Jordan).
PhD. Department of Biopharmaceutics and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Jordan. Amman (Jordan).
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2019 Oct-Dec;17(4):1661. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2019.4.1661. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
To assess inhaler technique demonstration skills of community pharmacists located in Amman, Jordan via incorporating the trained secret simulated patient (SSP) approach. Secondly, to evaluate the effectiveness of a 2-hour educational workshop focused on SSP feedback.
This cross-sectional study involved community pharmacies located in Amman, Jordan. Initially, a trained SSP was involved to enact baseline visits requesting advice on how to use Ventolin® (a pressurized metered-dose inhaler; pMDI) and Pulmicort® (a Turbohaler inhaler, TH). Immediately after each visit, the SSP completed an inhaler technique evaluation form with inhaler checklists based on previously published checklists (consisting of 9 and 10 items for pMDI and TH respectively). The SSP invited all participating pharmacists to a 2-hour workshop that included feedback on their demonstration skills, and the second evaluation of their inhaler technique. The workshop included a summary of the initial visits' results highlighting pharmacists' performance.
Sixty pharmacies were visited and 120 inhaler assessments were completed. During baseline assessment, pharmacists scored an average of 4.5 out of 9 for pMDI and 4.9 out of 10 for TH. Only 11 pharmacists (18.3%) attended the workshop. During the workshop, inhaler technique demonstration skills significantly improved, as scores improved from 5.4 (SD 1.6) to 7.8 (SD 0.9) (p=0.008) and from 4.6 (SD 2.5) to 9.9 (SD 0.6) (p=0.003) for pMDI and TH respectively.
The SSP approach revealed a lack of ability to demonstrate correct inhaler technique for pMDI and TH inhalers by community pharmacists in Amman, Jordan. A focused educational workshop based on SSP feedback improved inhaler technique significantly.
通过采用经过培训的秘密模拟患者(SSP)方法,评估约旦安曼社区药剂师的吸入器技术示范技能。其次,评估一个专注于SSP反馈的两小时教育工作坊的效果。
这项横断面研究涉及约旦安曼的社区药房。最初,一名经过培训的SSP进行基线访视,就如何使用万托林(一种压力定量吸入器;pMDI)和普米克(一种都保吸入器,TH)寻求建议。每次访视后,SSP立即根据先前发布的清单(pMDI和TH分别包含9项和10项)完成一份带有吸入器检查表的吸入器技术评估表。SSP邀请所有参与的药剂师参加一个两小时的工作坊,其中包括对他们示范技能的反馈以及对他们吸入器技术的第二次评估。该工作坊包括对初始访视结果的总结,突出药剂师的表现。
共访视了60家药房,完成了120次吸入器评估。在基线评估中,药剂师在pMDI方面的平均得分为9分中的4.5分,在TH方面的平均得分为10分中的4.9分。只有11名药剂师(18.3%)参加了工作坊。在工作坊期间,吸入器技术示范技能显著提高,pMDI的得分从5.4(标准差1.6)提高到7.8(标准差0.9)(p=0.008),TH的得分从4.6(标准差2.5)提高到9.9(标准差0.6)(p=0.003)。
SSP方法显示约旦安曼的社区药剂师缺乏正确示范pMDI和TH吸入器吸入技术的能力。基于SSP反馈的针对性教育工作坊显著提高了吸入器技术。